zelezo vlk
Well-known member
- Messages
- 18,013
- Reaction score
- 5,055
A little but if he's able to then all power to him.a beat writer going on vacation during spring ball is kind of strange no?
A little but if he's able to then all power to him.a beat writer going on vacation during spring ball is kind of strange no?
More to the point, it's probably a time when CFB fans are consuming more content so you would probably want to be producing content even if it's filler.Spring football is basically this now:
90% Staff/player interviews chopped up into videos and articles
7% Practice writeups based on workouts in shorts/stretching/positional drill work
3% Practice writeups based on full team work
AI can cover spring practice pretty easily. I'd go to Europe now too, they've made it harder than ever to cover the team and gain real insight into the program and player development.
I mean, that is literally what The Athletic does. There's a reason for the change.But Pete's work has been increasingly long-form or deep dive.
I feel like this is actually a pretty long time. 3 weeks without any content in the middle of spring ball is a bit bizarre. He could have easily written some deeper dive articles beforehand and had them post while he was gone.More to the point, it's probably a time when CFB fans are consuming more content so you would probably want to be producing content even if it's filler.
EDIT: Anyway, it's only been 19 days since Sampson last put out an article for The Athletic so it's not as if he's taken a huge hiatus.
Also - someone said Europea beat writer going on vacation during spring ball is kind of strange no?
Also - someone said Europe
But, I know a few weeks back he said he'd be going on vacation/assignment to write stories about certain QBs from Mississippi and Alabama while down there...
Aka, Deuce, Riley and the most important ND prospect in HS today... Gunner
Yeah I’m not sure I’ve ever gotten a ton of genuine insight into the game from Pete. That’s kind of why he works in The Athletic’s format. Nothing wrong with that.No offense to Pete, but his post-practice stuff was never his draw. Love the Tims and John Brice over at II (haven't heard enough from their new guy) plus Jamie at ISD for their practice stuff. But Pete's work has been increasingly long-form or deep dive.
His niche does seem to be the 40,000 foot view of ND football, and that's fine. He gets things right, unlike a lot of other national publications when they focus on ND. He also seems like a genuinely nice guy, which definitely isn't a given with some other ND beat reporters. You do need to have the patience of a saint.Yeah I’m not sure I’ve ever gotten a ton of genuine insight into the game from Pete. That’s kind of why he works in The Athletic’s format. Nothing wrong with that.
His niche does seem to be the 40,000 foot view of ND football, and that's fine. He gets things right, unlike a lot of other national publications when they focus on ND. He also seems like a genuinely nice guy, which definitely isn't a given with some other ND beat reporters. You do need to have the patience of a saint.
Everyone at the Athletic is a bad month away from getting laid off anyway. Might as well jump to the front of the line and save someone else's job.
There’s usually some time dedicated to letting us know how stupid Notre Dame fans are on both of his podcasts, but it’s not typically coming from Pete…His niche does seem to be the 40,000 foot view of ND football, and that's fine. He gets things right, unlike a lot of other national publications when they focus on ND. He also seems like a genuinely nice guy, which definitely isn't a given with some other ND beat reporters. You do need to have the patience of a saint.
Pete does not have the background/insight that the best former-player TV color guys (Mayock, Orlovsky) can bring. Nor is he a big Xs and Os guy. But the occasional series he's done for the Athletic where he sits down with players to analyze plays from their past season - the way the players see them - is some of the most insightful football journalism I've ever read.Yeah I’m not sure I’ve ever gotten a ton of genuine insight into the game from Pete. That’s kind of why he works in The Athletic’s format. Nothing wrong with that.
O'Malley I really like, but he again takes it a little personal sometimes.
Tbf listening to any of the ND beat (or anyone in football) talk about things can be frustrating.
Its like all media, as long as you know the presenter’s bias then it can be usefulI've consumed as much ND content as anyone in the past 10 years and I've listened to ND podcasts/youtube channels less than a handful of times.
They all suck in long verbal form.
Tbf listening to any of the ND beat (or anyone in football) talk about things can be frustrating. They can do a complete 180 and say it’s what everyone always saw or knew. And listening to them talk about things they have no knowledge about (especially the NFL) is infuriating to anyone who actually bothers to pay attention lol.
This is why I'm glad we have Brice, now. That guy knows more about football than any of them. He's better at picking out details of play and highlighting their importance and he's not reticent to criticize. He's better at giving us the context of ND in the national landscape, in that he has sources outside of ND football that he leans on, in addition to those he's cultivated since he's writing *for* ND, as well. This is hard to describe, but I think he does a good job of acting like an SEC beat writer on the ND beat.
Prister and O'Malley know ND history better, of course, but Prister is not cut out for social media interaction and O'Malley just wants to play chuckle fuck a lot of the time. I like Sampson and his long form stuff in The Athletic, but, I look elsewhere for game analysis.
Anyone can speak in generalities about ND being a blueblood and always having a seat at the table, etc, etc. I want to know what a guy/team does on the field that makes him/them good, compared to what other guys/teams do that make them not as good. Brice is great at that.
Spot onThis is why I'm glad we have Brice, now. That guy knows more about football than any of them. He's better at picking out details of play and highlighting their importance and he's not reticent to criticize. He's better at giving us the context of ND in the national landscape, in that he has sources outside of ND football that he leans on, in addition to those he's cultivated since he's writing *for* ND, as well. This is hard to describe, but I think he does a good job of acting like an SEC beat writer on the ND beat.
Prister and O'Malley know ND history better, of course, but Prister is not cut out for social media interaction and O'Malley just wants to play chuckle fuck a lot of the time. I like Sampson and his long form stuff in The Athletic, but, I look elsewhere for game analysis.
Anyone can speak in generalities about ND being a blueblood and always having a seat at the table, etc, etc. I want to know what a guy/team does on the field that makes him/them good, compared to what other guys/teams do that make them not as good. Brice is great at that.
His piece on Carr had me fired upWe really are super lucky to have John Brice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe Driskel’s hypersensitivity is the most well-documented item in this forum. But, he’s certainly earned the commentary. Incredibly, the people he has added in recent months are so bad that I actually have begun to appreciate him more. Driskel is playing chess, apparently.Lmao
In IBs Livestream today the chat apparently wanted them to start discussing QBs more (or something like that) and Driskell went ape shit and called them little bitches for whining
Lmfao
Knowing Driskel is hypersensitive and incapable of handling even the slightest criticism is the key to understanding literally everything about him.I believe Driskel’s hypersensitivity is the most well-documented item in this forum. But, he’s certainly earned the commentary. Incredibly, the people he has added in recent months are so bad that I actually have begun to appreciate him more. Driskel is playing chess, apparently.