A&M is just the easy example. Miami is another if you’d like, and so is USC. Schools throwing large payments at kids to reinforce or flip their roster quickly. It’s simply not sustainable for most schools trying to play the same game that Bama and UGA perfected before it was remotely close to being “legal.”
I don’t think ND is saying kids are ethically or morally wrong. They’re just committed to doing NIL the right way, rather than allowing “pay for play.”
I’m not in disagreement with you and
@GATTACA! about the principals of the matter, either… if no one is enforcing the rule, ND should throw its weight around if it’s serious about winning. It wouldn’t be a sign of a moral flaw, just that they are willing to secure the best student athletes for the university.
But that’s not how ND operates when it comes to following the rules, and everyone should know that by now. Its pointless to get upset about it, is all. Clamoring for rogue donors to save the day means you believe bunch of really smart rich dudes are going to gamble their money on several 17yo’s each year on the off chance their recruiting projections are right. As nice as that would be, and as much as I’d love to say that any amount of money and risk is worth a natty… that type of investment is not how the majority of ND donors that could save the day would operate, I don’t think.