Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
you've lost the plot, bro. not sure what else I can tell you.

I already told you - multiple times - that my statement was about the Christian God, as that was the intent of seekNDestroy's original remark. Nobody on the right is stating that the Left hates Buddha or Ganesh. C'mon now. I can't help you if you refuse to acknowledge that.

And you also need to realize that there are far more people that claim to be religious but are non-practicing. Looking at church attendance is ONE WAY in which you can see a person's involvement in their religion.

Far more people claim to be religious and skip church than have a deep religious commitment and don't attend church. Again, c'mon now.

You keep wanting to make this about all religions. So, show me examples of Republicans claiming that the left hates Buddhist or Hindu gods.

And - let's try to have a civil discussion and skip name calling. You accuse me of being 12, but read the tones of the posts and reassess who is being immature.
There isnt anything more you can say. You made the statement Democrats hate God and a majority of Democrats aren't religious and a handful of other sweepingly and generally stupid statements without merit. I demonstrably provided you with evidence that your statements are provably false and you continue to ignore my provided evidence. you wont accept Americans practice tons of religions (none have a claim on moral superiority), you dont accept that Republican and Democrats are represented by multiple religions in this country and instead claim Democrats hate god and such. Good luck with that approach. It doesnt work on me.
 
Last edited:

sixstar

Well-known member
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2,064
No reason to go that far because you aren't a Christian, so you would neither understand nor agree. But you already know that homosexuality is a sin in the Bible, and I've already posted John 14:15, so you know why I think like I do.
 

sixstar

Well-known member
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2,064
There isnt anything more you can say. You made the statement Democrats hate God and a majority of Democrats aren't religious and a handful of other sweepingly and generally stupid statements without merit. I demonstrably provided you with evidence that your statements are provably false and you continue to ignore my provided evidence. Good luck with that approach. It doesnt work on me.

Yeah, I said those things and provided evidence that you rejected, so we can agree to disagree. Let's move on.
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
4,524
No reason to go that far because you aren't a Christian, so you would neither understand nor agree. But you already know that homosexuality is a sin in the Bible, and I've already posted John 14:15, so you know why I think like I do.
Jesus has no use for people like you.
 

sixstar

Well-known member
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2,064
Well, you’re disagreeing with Jesus, not me.

Don't confuse love and acceptance. A parent does not accept a child's drug addiction; they will fight to help their child break the addiction out of love. Jesus displays this love and admonishment with the adulterous woman in John 8. Go and sin no more.

I do my best to love everyone, regardless of lifestyle. That does not mean I agree with or celebrate their lifestyle. My gay friends and family will tell you that I love them. It's not my place to judge since I have my own numerous issues.

I also don't think it's the government's responsibility to outlaw homosexual marriage. You can't legislate people into salvation. Outlawing gay marriage doesn't prevent people from desiring or practicing that lifestyle.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,385
I only drink when I'm tailgating or we're pregaming for Thanksgiving (tradition), but when I do I'm partial to the beverage of my Polish ancestors: vodka. Never been a beer guy and can't seem to tolerate most other drinks.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,389
Reaction score
5,814
I’m pretty sure this is what most GOP strategists are thinking.
Why not remind people that Warnock's votes are more devastating to Georgians than anything Walker has said or done? Our Puerto Rican President doesn't even make sense, so it's not a requirement.

Every Republican out there must stick to the message. Crime, inflation, open borders, out-of-control spending, and unchecked incompetence from the White House. Democrats have been a huge pain on all of those and it must be stopped.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Why not remind people that Warnock's votes are more devastating to Georgians than anything Walker has said or done? Our Puerto Rican President doesn't even make sense, so it's not a requirement.

Every Republican out there must stick to the message. Crime, inflation, open borders, out-of-control spending, and unchecked incompetence from the White House. Democrats have been a huge pain on all of those and it must be stopped.
Hilarious. Run on that platform and a shit ton of women (new voters plus most women) are voting for #Roevember.

Newly released voter registration data shows a surge in women registering to vote in the months following the Supreme Court decision overturning the landmark abortion protections established under the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.

According to data compiled by Democratic political data and data services firm TargetSmart, women have made up the vast majority of newly registered voters in battleground states in the months since Roe was overturned, with the numbers weighing heavily in favor of Democrats.

In the battleground state of Pennsylvania, women have accounted for more than 56 percent of newly registered voters since the June 24 decision, with nearly two-thirds registering as Democrats and more than half under the age of 25.



Pro-abortion rights protesters demonstrate outside of a Catholic church in downtown Manhattan on August 6, 2022, in New York City. Newly released voter registration data shows a surge in women registering to vote in the months following the Supreme Court decision overturning the landmark abortion protections established under the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.ROBERT NICKELSBERG/GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA
NEWSWEEK NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP >
In other battleground states like Michigan and Ohio, the number of women registering to vote outpaced the number of men by double-digit percentages while Kansas—where voters recently rejected efforts to overturn abortion protections in the state constitution —saw a similar surge.

"This decision came at a point in the election cycle where running for office was essentially off the table," executive director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University Debbie Walsh told Newsweek. "Filing deadlines have largely passed. But voting is still a powerful way for women to exercise their voice and this issue is energizing women, and they're registering as Democrats."


From a big-picture perspective, the trend is not too shocking. Over the last several decades, women have proportionally outnumbered men in regard to voter registration and voter turnout, according to historic data compiled by CAWP.

READ MORE
NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION OFFERS >
Whether the trend matters will rely on their enthusiasm to go to the polls and by how much they outnumber men. When Republicans held control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2014 midterms, women only outpaced men at the polls by 6 million votes. However, four years later when Democrats retook the House, women outvoted men by more than 8 million votes, with the spoils largely going to the Democratic Party.

Some believe the overturn of Roe could prove a flashpoint for Democrats at a time when they were expected to face an uphill battle to retain their House majority in the fall.

"We are seeing early signs of what could lead to a huge increase in women voting in November," TargetSmart CEO Tom Bonier said in a Twitter thread announcing the findings. "These registration patterns closely resemble that of younger voters in '18 post-Parkland, which fueled the blue wave that year. This surge is young and female."


Democrats are already seeking to take advantage. According to AdImpact data analyzed by the New York Times earlier this month, Democrats have spent approximately $31.9 million on abortion-related TV ads since the overturn of Roe, nearly eight times that of Republicans. Walsh said the trend represents a marked shift from Democratic politics even several years ago, where the taboo subject of abortion access has since become a rallying cry in a campaign season that has only recently turned competitive.


"Five years ago, the conventional wisdom for most Democrats was to try not to go to the abortion issue, to stay away from it," Walsh said. "And now, Democratic candidates are taking it on full-scale. The thing about this decision is it strikes such a chord because it's taking away a right that women had for decades. And when people lose something they had, I think it's even more it has more of an impact, and in this case, can be even more motivating."
INB4 "The SCOTUS didnt take away the right!" .....yeah the sent it to the states who are currently taking away womens' rights they ahve had for decades. So women will be voting for Dems to take control of Senate and codify Roe, voting rights, and all other personal rights set to be taken away by states because of SCOTUS' rulings.
 
Last edited:

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Why not remind people that Warnock's votes are more devastating to Georgians than anything Walker has said or done? Our Puerto Rican President doesn't even make sense, so it's not a requirement.

Every Republican out there must stick to the message. Crime, inflation, open borders, out-of-control spending, and unchecked incompetence from the White House. Democrats have been a huge pain on all of those and it must be stopped.
You see here’s the thing, what you are saying suggests that someone would be capable of first, being honest about the shitty things they did in the past so they aren’t constantly coming out during the campaign. Second, one would need to be able to make simple, coherent statements about what you outlined above.

Walker can’t do that because he seems to be incapable of being upfront about what a scumbag he was (I mean he has lied consistently about his past to his own staffers you know the people that are trying to help him) and he is just really fucking dumb. It’s amazing honestly.

One can debate about policies on crime, economics, ect… the cause and solutions all day.

What I think isnt really debatable is that Walker is demonstrably the stupidest Senate candidate running this year by a long shot.

Hell, he is possibly the stupidest Senate candidate from any major party to ever run.
 
Last edited:

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,483
Reaction score
14,206
Now, one can debate about policies on crime, economics, ect… all day. I think what’s clear cut is that Walker is demonstrably the stupidest Senate candidate I have ever seen run for office.
And he's got a very good chance of winning.

I have very genuine sympathy for him.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
You see here’s the thing, what you are saying suggests that someone would be capable of first, being honest about the shitty things they did in the past so they aren’t constantly coming out during the campaign. Second, one would need to be able to make simple, coherent statements about what you outlined above.

Walker can’t do that because he seems to be incapable of being upfront about what a scumbag he was (I mean he has lied consistently about his past to his own staffers you know the people that are trying to help him) and he is just really fucking dumb. It’s amazing honestly.

One can debate about policies on crime, economics, ect… the cause and solutions all day.

What I think isnt really debatable is that Walker is demonstrably the stupidest Senate candidate running this year by a long shot.

Hell, he is possibly the stupidest Senate candidate from any major party to ever run.
Triggering libtards for the win! But it really doesn't matter because in the end both parties are so polarized it will be a yes or no vote as needed in any event.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,389
Reaction score
5,814
You see here’s the thing, what you are saying suggests that someone would be capable of first, being honest about the shitty things they did in the past so they aren’t constantly coming out during the campaign. Second, one would need to be able to make simple, coherent statements about what you outlined above.

Walker can’t do that because he seems to be incapable of being upfront about what a scumbag he was (I mean he has lied consistently about his past to his own staffers you know the people that are trying to help him) and he is just really fucking dumb. It’s amazing honestly.

One can debate about policies on crime, economics, ect… the cause and solutions all day.

What I think isnt really debatable is that Walker is demonstrably the stupidest Senate candidate running this year by a long shot.

Hell, he is possibly the stupidest Senate candidate from any major party to ever run.
Warnock is a scumbag too. Videos of his wife were around the last cycle on a police bodycam. He borrowed a dog and claimed it repeatedly. He's also a shady Reverend. Plus, I still say, despite how desperate Dems are to shift to killing babies as a right as the top issue this cycle, it is far down the list and only inspiring people who are likely not undecided.

As for the worst, I'll raise you the 'age-of-consent guy' and incoherent sentence guy whose only platform is emptying jails and further spiking crime. Is Walker willing to debate because Fetterman isn't. AZ Governor race has another scared-to-debate bum too.





 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,389
Reaction score
5,814
Triggering libtards for the win! But it really doesn't matter because in the end both parties are so polarized it will be a yes or no vote as needed in any event.
Yeah, except for those few swing voters who aren't polarized or have Biden remorse. If you aren't outraged by whatever the thing of the day is, you're still watching your expenses go up and crime surge.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Warnock is a scumbag too. Videos of his wife were around the last cycle on a police bodycam. He borrowed a dog and claimed it repeatedly. He's also a shady Reverend. Plus, I still say, despite how desperate Dems are to shift to killing babies as a right as the top issue this cycle, it is far down the list and only inspiring people who are likely not undecided.

As for the worst, I'll raise you the 'age-of-consent guy' and incoherent sentence guy whose only platform is emptying jails and further spiking crime. Is Walker willing to debate because Fetterman isn't. AZ Governor race has another scared-to-debate bum too.






 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Yeah, except for those few swing voters who aren't polarized or have Biden remorse. If you aren't outraged by whatever the thing of the day is, you're still watching your expenses go up and crime surge.
Those will be swamped by the 18-25 Gen Z new voter registering 4-1 as Dem and the women vote gender gap this midterm. You on multiple times have dissmissed the abortion issue as a catalyzing force this election. Thats fine. I dont think Dems will hold the House (due to extreme gerrymandering) but they are very much favored to get a filibuster breaking number of seats in the Senate.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,389
Reaction score
5,814
Those will be swamped by the 18-25 Gen Z new voter registering 4-1 as Dem and the women vote gender gap this midterm. You on multiple times have dissmissed the abortion issue as a catalyzing force this election. Thats fine. I dont think Dems will hold the House (due to extreme gerrymandering) but they are very much favored to get a filibuster breaking number of seats in the Senate.
It's consistently down the list of voter priorities on polling. Only left-wing news outlets and dem campaigns are being touted. Dems and media desperately want it to be a thing, but I don't see evidence it is a thing yet.
This is where we are:
 
Last edited:

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,359
Reaction score
5,709
...do you think....that maybe....the cooperate class pillaging and destroying the middle class ya'know...might be the cause? Or is it your position that over the course of 2 year Biden was the mastermind behind this.

Thank god they got tax cuts! Trickle down babbbyyyy
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
...do you think....that maybe....the cooperate class pillaging and destroying the middle class ya'know...might be the cause? Or is it your position that over the course of 2 year Biden was the mastermind behind this.

Thank god they got tax cuts! Trickle down babbbyyyy
Never mind that inflation, supply chains, and oil prices are a global issue and that you can only keep interest rates at near zero for so long... If you are voting because of inflation then I cant help you.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,359
Reaction score
5,709
Never mind that inflation, supply chains, and oil prices are a global issue and that you can only keep interest rates at near zero for so long... If you are voting because of inflation then I cant help you.
You mean to tell me that the longest bull market wasn't going to continue till the end of time? I've only been alive since 2010 plz help :(
 
Top