FightingIrishLover7
All troll, no substance
- Messages
- 12,703
- Reaction score
- 7,516
So, for the people that think Obama hasn't improve the economy (or improved it enough), what are the major complaints?
My comment was simply about WHERE she's delivering that message. She's in Detroit, a pit of economic despair where they'll pay you to buy a house because things are so bad that nobody wants to live there. It's like giving a speech about how great the EPA is in Flint or how much Obama has improved race relations in Ferguson.If you're not criticizing the Obama economy, I'm not sure what your point is. Hillary is basically promising to continue it.
Hopefully someone will jump in because I don't feel like typing a ton on my phone, but the Affordable Care Act would be my primary issue directly attributable to Obama. I also hated TARP and the stimulus package, but I fully acknowledge that there are Republican fingerprints all over those.So, for the people that think Obama hasn't improve the economy (or improved it enough), what are the major complaints?
Monica Crowley on Fox just pointed out that of the 18 GOP wins so far, none were won by an Establishment Candidate.
Hopefully someone will jump in because I don't feel like typing a ton on my phone, but the Affordable Care Act would be my primary issue directly attributable to Obama. I also hated TARP and the stimulus package, but I fully acknowledge that there are Republican fingerprints all over those.
Of bigger concern to me is the bogus free money policies of the Federal Reserve, but that's not really on Obama. The markets are supported by zero interest rates and the shit will hit the fan (again). Every bubble eventually bursts.
Define "establishment." I agree, but that definition has been a moving target. Rubio is the establishment darling and he was a tea party favorite a few years ago.
So, for the people that think Obama hasn't improve the economy (or improved it enough), what are the major complaints?
He hasn't done anything. It's not his economy. Bernanke and Yellen have done more for the economy than anyone elected. The economy under Obama has boomed from Wall Street where they have done it themselves. The oil rush sure as hell didn't come from Obama and the wage growth has been terrible. We have more people out of the workforce and our debt is still growing. So no, to hell with Barry.
Do you know why they have done more? Because the federal reserve has more direct power than any president could ever have.He hasn't done anything. It's not his economy. Bernanke and Yellen have done more for the economy than anyone elected. The economy under Obama has boomed from Wall Street where they have done it themselves. The oil rush sure as hell didn't come from Obama and the wage growth has been terrible. We have more people out of the workforce and our debt is still growing. So no, to hell with Barry.
Detroit is better today than the day Obama took office, that is basically irrefutable. Their downtown is gentrifying and they've attracted a ton of suburban money by placing their stadiums downtown. It's not good, in fact it's still quite bad, but Detroit has had better years under Obama than you might think.My comment was simply about WHERE she's delivering that message. She's in Detroit, a pit of economic despair where they'll pay you to buy a house because things are so bad that nobody wants to live there. It's like giving a speech about how great the EPA is in Flint or how much Obama has improved race relations in Ferguson.
He hasn't done anything. It's not his economy. Bernanke and Yellen have done more for the economy than anyone elected. The economy under Obama has boomed from Wall Street where they have done it themselves. The oil rush sure as hell didn't come from Obama and the wage growth has been terrible. We have more people out of the workforce and our debt is still growing. So no, to hell with Barry.
Do you know why they have done more? Because the federal reserve has more direct power than any president could ever have.
People need to quit associating the economy so closely with the president. The economy doesn't care who the president is. There's only so much one man can do.
A global economic shift is going to need a hell of a lot more than a president to "fix it".
On that note guys from the Fed have said repeatedly that the economic clusterfuck under Carter was a monetary issue he couldn't fix anyway...does that context ever get brought up by conservatives? Noooope.
And you're right. I am legitimately curious and would love to know the answer to a simple "economy and the President" question: who is the last President to not have the economy reach a record size while they're in office?
Obama? Yep.
Bush? Yep.
Clinton? Yep.
Bush? Yep.
Reagan? Yep.
Carter? Yep.
Ford? Yep.
Nixon? Yep.
Johnson? Yep.
Kennedy? Yep.
Eisenhower? Yep.
Truman? Yep.
Roosevelt? Yep.
So all of the Presidents since the crash at least, how far would we have to go back to find a President who actually saw the economy shrink and not recover under their administration?
Am I being too simplistic or is it a rather safe bet to say that the greatest economy in the history of the world going to continue being that regardless of who is President?
Monica Crowley on Fox just pointed out that of the 18 GOP wins so far, none were won by an Establishment Candidate.
If Rubio is considered establishment, then damn that's got to be a win for the conservative movement as a whole
I found this interesting...actually pretty amazing. Not sure who Catholics are favoring in this race. I know some of the Catholic groups I receive info seem to be pushing Cruz.
Want to Know Who Will Win the Presidency? Ask the Pope | Acumen | OZY
<iframe
I would vote for Trump over Cruz and I wouldn't even pause to think it over in the booth.
![]()
Let's all swear an oath of allegiance to the front runner.