- Messages
- 20,894
- Reaction score
- 8,126
Yes, but the methodology in getting expected earnings is opinion. I find that it disregards the individual completely. Simply multiplying GSR with earnings does not quantify value in terms of educational opportunity. What it does tell me is how selective ND is in the screening process by the type of person they recruit. Wouldn't you agree that their screening process for football players has a major impact on GSR much like Stanford?
Of course. But I see no way to suss out "value added by the University" from the inherent quality of the students admitted.
But this is getting far afield from the post I initially responded to:
It is actually closer than you think. It is more like, do you want to live in Chicago or Los Angeles because those connections you will make during undergrad are what counts the most in my opinion.
Which simply isn't true. Even just looking at raw salary data, which is skewed in USC's favor since it doesn't account for LA's insanely high cost of living, ND grads make, on average, ~38% more than USC grads. Factor in football GSRs, and ND offers 3x more degree value than USC, mostly because the Trojans don't give a sh!t about graduating their players.
Stanford and Duke are the only other football schools offering a comparable education to ND.