What is a Letter of Intent?

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
By David Fox, Rivals.com college football staff writer
Thousands of high school athletes will sign their National Letter of Intent this week, beginning the next phase of their lives as a collegiate student-athlete. On the flip side, coaches all over the country will wait pensively in front of the fax machine for those coveted signatures.
But what does all this mean? Why all the hubbub for a sheet of paper and a signature?
Simply put, a National Letter of Intent seals the recruiting process. With his signature, a student-athlete accepts a four-year institution's athletic scholarship offer. The signature ends a student-athlete's recruitment and binds him to a single college or university.
By signing a letter of intent, the student-athlete agrees to attend the college or university for one year. The institution also agrees to provide financial aid for one year. Other institutions are prohibited to continue recruiting a student-athlete once he signs a letter of intent.
In football, the signing period begins on the first Wednesday in February. This year the signing period begins Feb. 7 and lasts through April 1. Most high school athletes sign letters of intent on the first day. Junior college transfers sign midyear, usually in December.

A signed letter is binding to the university or college, not a coach or team. It is binding for one academic year. It does not guarantee a spot on the team or playing time.
Student-athletes sign a National Letter of Intent only for the first year. NCAA rules require institutions to notify athletes whether their athletics aid has been renewed.
Schools recruiting a student-athlete will send a National Letter of Intent, indicating an official scholarship offer. A parent or legal guardian of a student-athlete under the age of 21 is required to sign the letter of intent along with the athlete. College coaches are not allowed to be present for the signing of a letter of intent.
Prior to receiving a signed letter of intent from a recruit, institutions are permitted only to confirm their recruitment of a prospect. Only after receiving a signed National Letter of Intent can institutions and coaches comment fully on the prospect.
Most Division I-A programs release signing lists on National Signing Day of the members of their incoming freshman class, which is generally around 25 members.
The National Letter of Intent program is intended to prevent last-minute changes on the part of both the student-athlete and the institution. The student-athlete is ensured financial aid for his first year of college while the athletic team is ensured his presence on the team for the coming season, pending academic qualification for the scholarship.
Fifty-four conferences and nine independent universities are members of the program, which is administered by the Collegiate Commissioners Association, not the NCAA.
Source: National-Letter.org
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
so this is a super random bump and maybe this is better off in a different thread.

Zimmerman to Commit Late, Won’t Sign an NLI | ZagsBlog.com

Stephen Zimmerman, the 7-footer from Las Vegas Bishop Gorman, won’t commit until the spring and won’t sign a National Letter of Intent at all, his mother told SNY.tv.

“It doesn’t protect the student-athlete, only the University,” Lori Zimmerman said by text.

An NLI binds the student-athlete to the school, meaning if the coach leaves or is fired the player is still obligated to attend the school unless he gets a release.

Some prospects ask for an addendum to the NLI specifying that if the coach leaves, the player is also free to leave.

We all have seen that the NLI can pretty much become a joke. What happens when all these kids start refusing to sign?
 

T Town Tommy

Alabama Bag Man
Messages
6,278
Reaction score
2,768
so this is a super random bump and maybe this is better off in a different thread.

Zimmerman to Commit Late, Won’t Sign an NLI | ZagsBlog.com



We all have seen that the NLI can pretty much become a joke. What happens when all these kids start refusing to sign?

More and more schools are offering four year scholarships and I think it will eventually be every school at some point. That would probably end any questions with NLOI issues.

In ZImmerman's case, I would tell him, and his mom, to take a hike. Nothing wrong with wanting to protect your kid, but it should be a privilege to receive an athletic scholarship... not a right. Sounds like his time at whatever school he chooses will require some high maintenance... especially since it seems mom is already spouting off.
 
K

koonja

Guest
I'm sure this will be a real popular opinion, but I am not convinced that schools should be forced to give 4 year schollys.

I love that ND does and I think every kid should be more attracted to schools that do, but if a kid comes in and isn't willing to put effort into the sport, why should that kid keep his scholarship? Let's say we have a MLB that's on his 5th year and just happy to get a free ride, doesn't practice, play, or study the game hard. Then you have walk-on Joe Schmidt, out playing and out working him in every way.

I understand the argument to keep them. But are academic scholarships handed out for 4 years, even if the student is happy as a clam to turn in C+'s? No.
 

Emcee77

latress on the men-jay
Messages
7,295
Reaction score
555
I'm not sure I would sign it either, if I was sure that the schools I was interested in would keep a spot for me if I didn't.

The schools do have to provide you with a scholarship for at least one year if you sign the NLI and abide by its terms, right? It's not quite true that it doesn't protect the student-athlete, if Mrs. Zimmerman means it doesn't protect him AT ALL. It provides some protection. But it definitely favors the school and it doesn't protect the athlete against a coach leaving or something like that.
 

Circa

Conspire to keep It real
Messages
8,000
Reaction score
818
I'm sure this will be a real popular opinion, but I am not convinced that schools should be forced to give 4 year schollys.

I love that ND does and I think every kid should be more attracted to schools that do, but if a kid comes in and isn't willing to put effort into the sport, why should that kid keep his scholarship? Let's say we have a MLB that's on his 5th year and just happy to get a free ride, doesn't practice, play, or study the game hard. Then you have walk-on Joe Schmidt, out playing and out working him in every way.

I understand the argument to keep them. But are academic scholarships handed out for 4 years, even if the student is happy as a clam to turn in C+'s? No.

I'm not sure I really understand your point? If we are the epitome of 4 year students signing a letter than shouldn't we be proud of that, and be the mark for the Collegiate Commissioners Association? Giving something away when there is some form of mutual agreement is not really giving. It's an abiding force that seems to be lost with everything any more.

For instance:
Just because Mathias Kiwanuka agreed to the pay cut he took to stay with the Giants this year, that doesn’t mean he’s happy about it.

Kiwanuka railed against NFL contracts in general and the situation he found himself in specifically when he saw his pay for 2014 slashed from $4.375 million to $1.5 million. Kiwanuka said he went along with the Giants’ request to take a pay cut in large part because his wife had a baby in April and he didn’t want to uproot his family this offseason, but he doesn’t appreciate the fact that NFL teams can cut a player at any time. 'NBC'

He was in an agreement and took what was appropriate for his life at that moment.. after the fact he decided he wasn't happy. BS

After pay cut, Kiwanuka calls NFL contracts “unfair to players” | ProFootballTalk
 
Top