Pat, most of the **** that comes out of your mouth doesn't make sense, yet you're still here posting every day. Hysterical that you're talking about people letting anything go.
I was simply elaborating on a point made by someone else, I said nothing about one position or another in regard to illegal immigration, yet you seem to think I'm supporting the opposition.
You're supposed to rehash history, it helps you make informed decisions on present issues after examining the necessary data.
I'm personally against illegal immigration, because there is a law in place. I also believe in breaking laws that are unjust through civil disobedience, but not in this case. There is a process to gaining access to this country, and if you don't complete those steps, you don't get to come.
We have incentive from both sides of the aisle to let this happen though, because it's many lower income democratic voters, but the large majority of immigrants are of the Christian persuasion, which is why the Church is so pro-anesty.
Republicans get some cheap labor. This will happen, because it's what the powers that be want. An influx of low level laborers to pay some taxes, pews to be filled on Sunday, and an influx of democratic voters. Republicans can gain any as well though through the religion aspect though, so while it's generally safe to say more would be Democratic, there are also some gains for the Republicans.
I know ND kind of breaks with overall Church doctrine on occasion, but I think in this scenario they are in lockstep, because the churches are hemorrhaging parishioners. Amnesty helps will that to a certain extent.