Correct. Holley can play 3-4 DE or move inside in a 4-3.Correct, my understanding was 2 DE and 1NG with OLB/DE. Now Holley is the perfect DE/DT swing like Hayes is and Vanderdoes was supposed to be.
2 NT and 3 DE would suit my fancy quite nicely.
Can't decide my level of "want" for Holley. Our recent DL recruits from the northeast haven't turned out very well. Maybe there's something to the concerns over poor competition.
i feel you on this...but i think the universe of "ND DL from Northeast" (Ishaq, Jarron Jones, Stockton) is too small a sampling IMO to indicate a decided trend...and truth be told, the jury is still out on Ishaq (2 yrs left) and especially on Jarron (4 yrs left).
i think Hayes is going to surprise us all. and i do like Holley upside.
that all being said, gun to my head, if given the choice i take the DL's from down south 9 times out of 10.
guys, though! Stockton is a definite bust, Ishaq has had a slow start, and early reports on Jones aren't positive; he wasn't even in the 2-deep during Spring Camp. Jones himself has stated that the poor competition he faced in high school has made the transition difficult.Can't decide my level of "want" for Holley. Our recent DL recruits from the northeast haven't turned out very well. Maybe there's something to the concerns over poor competition.
To be honest I always questioned both Ishaq's and Jarron's effort. I didn't think either one played with a great amount of effort but they were definitely physical specimens with a ton of athleticism. Ishaq's development was also slowed down by having to play a new position.
However, I don't see that being a problem for Hayes or Holley. Both play to the whistle and I think they will have a much easier transition to the college game.
Let me also mention that two of Florida's top NFL defensive line prospects, Shariff Floyd and Dominique Easley are Northeast natives. Easley is from Staten Island.
Uh, when has Jarron played? Did I miss something?
I am talking about HS highlights. Ishaq looked good in HS but doesn't seem to play with that same effort now. Although he has improved.
Can't decide my level of "want" for Holley. Our recent DL recruits from the northeast haven't turned out very well. Maybe there's something to the concerns over poor competition.
My jury is no longer out on Ishaq. IMO, he was the best player in this year's blue gold game. I'd bet the house he has a monster year.
My jury is no longer out on Ishaq. IMO, he was the best player in this year's blue gold game. I'd bet the house he has a monster year.
My jury is no longer out on Ishaq. IMO, he was the best player in this year's blue gold game. I'd bet the house he has a monster year.
My jury is no longer out on Ishaq. IMO, he was the best player in this year's blue gold game. I'd bet the house he has a monster year.
I hope you're right, but betting the house based on a scrimmage? I dunno, dude. I'm gonna need to see him put it together for more than a play or two here and there when it counts.
While I think Ishaq is improving, in order for him to have a monster year he'll need to be on the field at least 75% of the time you would think. And as of now Shembo will be playing a majority of the snaps. He's an animal and ready to play every snap. Ishaq's time will come but probably not until next year.
It seemed that way but Sampson and Prister from II both were told by Elston that Ishaq playing DE for that period of time was more about getting him work during practice and because Tuitt was out. They both said that the staff doesn't intend to play him there much during the season. Now could he come in and play the DE in the 4-3 opposite Shembo sure, thats very likely but in order for him to have a monster year he'd have to beat out Shembo and thats not happening. Unless our idea of breakout seasons are different. Breakout for me would be in the range of 8+ sacks with 12+ TFL.
I think Ishaq will be better than Shembo this year.