GoIrish41
Paterfamilius
- Messages
- 9,929
- Reaction score
- 2,119
Translation: Phil Mickelson's labor (golf) pays very well if you excel in performance and it's how he feeds his family. And he should be taxed around 94% (his fair share) on his earnings so other people can have a "shot."
Would you say the same to Michael Floyd, Manti Te'o, Jimmy Clausen, Brady Quinn if their team were in CA but they purcahsed a home in another state that weren't so expensive and tax happy?
I don't even know what this means. He's claiming he is taxed at 63%, which fact checkers have claimed is false. They say he should be taxed at approximately 50 to 52% with minimal tax planning. Fifty percent of the $40 million or so that he made last year does not sound like much of a hardship to me, no matter where you live. He sounds a bit like a spoiled, whiney, country club brat IMO.