i'd love to say yes, but with his stock where it is (i'm assuming still 1st round grade or atleast #1 TE on the board) it would be hard for him to come back knowing his stock can only go down.
he proves week in and week out though why he's been the best for the last two years...i'm all about playing all for years, but in this case with him most likely having his degree as well he's more than ready for the next level.
he'd look good in chicago![]()
According to the ticker on ESPN the past few weeks he's listed as #2 TE behind the guy from Stanford FWIW.
I feel like Tyler could be a dominant WR in the NFL. Thoughts?
Why? (And perhaps I don't mean dominant, but a pain in the *** for sure.)
Maybe I'm confused as to what WR means?
I actually think it was Mcshay's maybe? I can't remember for sure, sorry.
what makes tyler even more appealing (similar to the dude from stanford) is their ability to block on the line of scrimmage and on the perimeter. for that reason coupled with his eliteness catching the ball and physical tools he's perfect as a TE. with the way the league uses TE's today anyway they're an extra receiver anyways
Same as always? A wide receiver. I just think he has relatively good speed, but there is really no one who can compete with this guy's combination of size and catching ability.
Are you kidding? haha Ertz and Toilolo are Stanford's starting TEs.
Hah. I agree man. Now I would be all for this if we went after an elite TE who could challenge and or make our other great TE's better but with Yeatman coming back to go along with incumbent starter (Ragone who is also a soph) and Rudolph AND Fauria, this position is waaaaaaaay 2 stacked to be offering a run of the mill TE with an offer from Purwho.
Tyler has received some interest from ND of late. He is the teammate of 2008, incoming recruit John Goodman. Tyler plays WR and CB.
He is a Mackey award finalist along with Ertz from Stanford and Seferian-Jenkins from Washington.
eifert was robbed of the mackey award last year, he definitely deserves it this year hes a complete tight end now.
Mooneytostle, I like that quote you found. We didn't know what we were getting with Eifert.
Here's an early post:
What? Eifert at CB? I can't imagine that! Or did CB stand for crushing bulldozer...I could see Eifert at a crushing bulldozer position.
I played in high school with him at Dwenger, and yes he definitely played corner for us sometimes, but it was mostly at free safety. He did come down and play DE for us sometimes. This was a pretty scary sight considering Tony Springmann was the other DE for us. We also had 6'3" 330lbs MLB my sophomore year who moved down to DT once he got to IU so our coach definitely wasn't afraid of using our size advantage at traditionally smaller positions.
Anybody else feel like the light switched on with the connection between Golson and Eifert last week? I know it was BC, so anybody could have shined, but I thought Golson targeted him more. He even checked to him several times when he wasn't the first look. If the last few games of the season this continues, then we might see this offense make some strides.
did Springman have a beard his freshman year of HS? I would like to presume so.
Anybody else feel like the light switched on with the connection between Golson and Eifert last week? I know it was BC, so anybody could have shined, but I thought Golson targeted him more. He even checked to him several times when he wasn't the first look. If the last few games of the season this continues, then we might see this offense make some strides.
Totally agree. I was wondering the same thing, the light must have finally went on for Golson, and he understands now to just throw it in the general direction of Eifert, and keep it about 8-10 feet in the air, and let Eifert do the rest.
Like you said, it was BC, but then again I would think with the mediocre defenses that Pitt and BC have, they would have focused all their efforts to stop Eifert with double or triple teams and that didn't seem to happen the past two weeks, Eifert has caught more passes in the last two games than the first 8 combined. Now there is also a flipside to that, maybe teams are slowly getting away from defensively focusing on Eifert because he isn't Golsons favorite target, like he was for Tommy. I mean it was obvious the first 7 games of the season that Golson just never looked toward Eifert, now that could have been because he really wasn't open, because BK told him not to even bother looking at Eifert because he will be so closely covered by the opposing defenses and was just playing it safe with his young QB., who knows? The only thing that does matter is he is finally getting Eifert the ball, and will only make Senior Kiffin to have more headaches on planning to stop him, Riddick out of the backfield, CB Deep, as well as some young studs that haven’t' seen the field much because of how well DD had been playing. With him out for that game, I sure hope we see a little of Neal. Uh oh, I'm starting to roll off threat topic, I'll stop here.