Your post is such BS. You really meant to use "rape" as a verb in your title in connection with babies and you are complaining about "filth" coming from Murdoch?
Are you mad at Murdoch for telling us that God intended rape? Do you really think he thinks that? If not, why not deal with what Murdoch was trying to say, rather than feign righteous indignation at his blunder.
He was apparently trying to say that he has come to the difficult and unpopular conclusion that a child who is conceived through rape is still an innocent human life, and that God meant for us to protect all innocent human life.
In fact, God prohibitted us from intentionally destroying it ("Thou shalt not murder"). That is an extremely uncomfortable and unsettling position that leads to conclusions like, "Nuking an entire city full of children and elderly people was wrong," and intentional abortion is always wrong. Disagree with him if you want, but the position of Mother Teresa, and every other Pope and Saint can hardly be categorized as "filth."
Here is what he said BTW. I agree that his answer was terribly given.
"I believe that life begins at conception. The only exception I have to have an abortion is in that case of the life of the mother. I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize that life is a gift from god and I think even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that god intended to happen,” said Mourdock.
