drayer54
Well-known member
- Messages
- 8,408
- Reaction score
- 5,828
Be honest even then you wouldn't admit any wrong doing.It needs to be this or better before I acknowledge any wrongdoing. Im using the Hunter Biden standard. If you don’t have explicit visual evidence, you got nothing.
View attachment 3061870
Sure would. I’m not Trump or else. I’d actually take Vance in a heartbeat.Be honest even then you wouldn't admit any wrong doing.
Sure would. I’m not Trump or else. I’d actually take Vance in a heartbeat.
This is good.
I wonder why he hasn't posted about any of the times Trump appeared in the Epstein.Find someone who loves you like Drayer loves Trump.
Because the NYT and I both believe it’s been a nothing burger.I wonder why he hasn't posted about any of the times Trump appeared in the Epstein.
Nothing burger
Child rape is based now deal with it, libtards 😎Find someone who loves you like Drayer loves Trump.
This and they posted that douche krassenstein like he isn’t some left wing neck beard.Yeah this is the person who called this into the FBI two weeks before the 2020 election and also told the FBI that Hillary Clinton was connected to the Oklahoma City bombing. So yes. Nothing burger.
Same. I voted DeSantis. I’m sure the murder drop (combined with booming GDP, low inflation, lower crime, halted immigration) is bad news for the Krassenstein Kult.That’s my thing, I voted for someone else in the past three primaries and could name several dozen other Rs I’d rather have as president instead, but stupid attacks like this force me to defend the guy.
Are you doing a terrible job of referencing the Bay Area and other pharmacies and stores that closed citing high crime? Overall crime down doesn’t mean we still don’t have some blue shitholes and locked up store shelves.Wait….if crime is continuing to decrease…..why are department stores closing down???
I was promised by a few seniors and rural admin workers that it was because of crime????
Here I was shocked to learn how wrong I was because of the actual data showing this wasn’t the case but they were so sure! If anyone was going to be right about the economics behind why brick and mortar is failing it was going to be the Danny Devito with Mike Ross’ ability to lie about his achievements guy!
(Rural neckbeards continue have brain damage from drinking flint water)
![]()
Clothes Stores Closing Across US in 2025
In 2025, numerous U.S. clothing and department stores announced closures, highlighted by Macy's decision to shut 66 outlets.www.newsweek.com
Are you doing a terrible job of referencing the Bay Area and other pharmacies and stores that closed citing high crime? Overall crime down doesn’t mean we still don’t have some blue shitholes and locked up store shelves.
Yet another of your dishonest weakminded strawman arguments. Crime may be down overall, but that doesn't mean that shoplifting isn't soaring in places like SF and Chicago at retailers. It is, and several stores have been forced to close because they were hemorrhaging money due to theft. Why say something stupid like "crime is down" when you know overall crime isn't what anyone's talking about, but specific types of crime (shoplifting) in cities. It's yet another sign that you don't have the facts nor the ability to argue anything on its actual merits. Smarm and juvenile insults and spin and strawman arguments are a poor substitute for actual intellect and debate. Now give us another weak, sissy, immature comment and pretend you're winning the discussion.Nope! I was told that stores closing was because of crime! Unless we think the Fake Doctor is....wrong?
Wait….if crime is continuing to decrease…..why are department stores closing down???
I was promised by a few seniors and rural admin workers that it was because of crime????
Here I was shocked to learn how wrong I was because of the actual data showing this wasn’t the case but they were so sure! If anyone was going to be right about the economics behind why brick and mortar is failing it was going to be the Danny Devito with Mike Ross’ ability to lie about his achievements guy!
(Rural neckbeards continue have brain damage from drinking flint water)
![]()
Clothes Stores Closing Across US in 2025
In 2025, numerous U.S. clothing and department stores announced closures, highlighted by Macy's decision to shut 66 outlets.www.newsweek.com
Can you explain to us why you choose to misrepresent others' arguments and points in virtually every post you make? Surely you're not so dull that you don't grasp that when we discuss retailers in major cities closing due to crime, we're talking about shoplifting and organized smash & grab stuff, and other types of organized retail theft, right? Was that unclear to you or are you just unable to address that adequately, thus the need to misrepresent what others are saying? Why? Strawman arguing is a blatant sign of intellectual or factual shortcomings. You either don't have the facts on your side or you're not intellectually capable of arguing them if you do. Which is it for you? Don't spin, don't dodge, don't change the subject. Tell us why you can't debate anything without distorting the other person's argument. We all know the answer, we just want to see if you do and if you have the character to admit it.Nope! I was told that stores closing was because of crime! Unless we think the Fake Doctor is....wrong?
I understand this is hard for you. Blue city, bad crime, no enforcement, lefty judges, caused companies to evac. Getting rid of 2.5 million criminals and turning off the crime spigot opened by Biden/Autopen likely helped.Nope! I was told that stores closing was because of crime! Unless we think the Fake Doctor is....wrong?
Epstein clearly didn’t like him. Enough that he was texting and collaborating with House Dems during session. Again, nothing earth shattering to date.I don't know if trump did anything or not. But not sure how you can defend him for being so close to Epstein.
Yes yes yes, blue city equal bad. Red city equal good.I understand this is hard for you. Blue city, bad crime, no enforcement, lefty judges, caused companies to evac. Getting rid of 2.5 million criminals and turning off the crime spigot opened by Biden/Autopen likely helped.
Epstein clearly didn’t like him. Enough that he was texting and collaborating with House Dems during session. Again, nothing earth shattering to date.
You really typed all of that and couldn’t provide any facts and logic? Yeesh, triggered?Yet another of your dishonest weakminded strawman arguments. Crime may be down overall, but that doesn't mean that shoplifting isn't soaring in places like SF and Chicago at retailers. It is, and several stores have been forced to close because they were hemorrhaging money due to theft. Why say something stupid like "crime is down" when you know overall crime isn't what anyone's talking about, but specific types of crime (shoplifting) in cities. It's yet another sign that you don't have the facts nor the ability to argue anything on its actual merits. Smarm and juvenile insults and spin and strawman arguments are a poor substitute for actual intellect and debate. Now give us another weak, sissy, immature comment and pretend you're winning the discussion.
At this point you have to be joking. I don’t think you know what a straw man is. I am laughing at you for being so incredibly wrong. I am laughing at you for spending so much time trying to convince yourself and everyone that you’re some brilliant person. You were out of touch with reality when you said that brick and mortar stores were closing because of theft. You don’t understand how basic economics work. This isn’t 1960. Big box stores are losing to ecomm and fulfilment centers. They are selling the theft angle to geriatrics who want to be coddled and miss the nostalgia. More bingo less Bongino.Can you explain to us why you choose to misrepresent others' arguments and points in virtually every post you make? Surely you're not so dull that you don't grasp that when we discuss retailers in major cities closing due to crime, we're talking about shoplifting and organized smash & grab stuff, and other types of organized retail theft, right? Was that unclear to you or are you just unable to address that adequately, thus the need to misrepresent what others are saying? Why? Strawman arguing is a blatant sign of intellectual or factual shortcomings. You either don't have the facts on your side or you're not intellectually capable of arguing them if you do. Which is it for you? Don't spin, don't dodge, don't change the subject. Tell us why you can't debate anything without distorting the other person's argument. We all know the answer, we just want to see if you do and if you have the character to admit it.