LOVEMYIRISH said:
I would love to see evidence of anyone considering him better than an average back. And let's not have it be an Irish Fan site.
CBS Sportsline had him as the 15th best running back at the end of last season - most of the guys ahead of him are in the NFL now. He'll be one of the top 10 or so backs in NCAA this coming season, and if he keeps improving, and plays his senior year, he'll finish as one of the top few backs in the country. This is talking purely as a college player. I don't know his prospects as a pro, and don't care. But as a college player he's much better than average, and it doesn't take an Irish bias to make that evident. It's simply a matter of numbers and performance.
LOVEMYIRISH said:
As for play calling... Quinn makes things happen with his decision making. When Walker decides to deviate from the plan at all, he gets hammered. He's not fast and his vision is average.
This could not be any more incorrect than it is. His entire game is his vision, and his ability to make things happen with his patience, ie his decision making. He's an inventive runner. He doesn't run at designed holes like Thomas, he waits to see how the play actually goes and then adjusts accordingly. Now you either like that style of runner or you don't (many Irish fans don't) but to say he has no vision and that he never deviates from the plan is simply incorrect, as that's what his entire game consists of.
LOVEMYIRISH said:
I am not saying he's bad...I am simply saying he is no better than a "Ryan Grant" type of back.
But he played in the same backfield with Grant, when Grant was a senior and Walker was just a freshman, and here's how they ran at those points in their respective careers:
Grant - 127 carries, 515 yds, 4.1 avg, 5 tds
Walker - 185 carries, 786 yds, 4.2 avg, 7 tds
Walker was already better than Grant, the senior, as a freshman, or at worst he was "as good as" Grant. Here's the more important reason why the comparison's not fair. Here are Grant's numbers.
(soph) 02 - 261 carries 1085 yds 4.2 avg 9 tds 9 catches 22 yards
(jun) 03 - 143 carries 510 yds 3.6 avg 3 tds 9 catches 64 yards
(sen) 04 - 127 carries 515 yds 4.1 avg 5 tds 6 catches 51 yards
That's a player who started out good, not great, and got progressively worse, and also older so that as more was expected of him, he actually gave less than he'd given at the start - a disaster of a player (sorry Ryan). Now compare Walker's career arc so far.
(fresh) 04 - 185 carries 786 yds 4.2 avg 7 tds 10 catches 74 yds 0 td
(soph) 05 - 253 carries 1196 yds 4.7 avg 9 tds 43 catches 351 yds 2 td
How is there any comparison between these two players? Walker came in as good as Grant was at his best. He came in so good, in fact, that he won Grant's job when Grant was a senior and Walker a freshman. And then, more importantly, he, who had come into ND better than Grant had ever been, improved significantly in his sophomore season in every category. If he continues his upward trend, look out. If he plateaus, he's a good running back. If he regresses, he'll get benched. But as of now, there's nothing in those numbers to merit his being compared to Ryan Grant.