Fitzgerald said:
The Irish averaged 36 or so points per game last season without a "burner" at running back. That's more than enough points per game to win a championship. So, they don't need one. The offense clicks without one. If they'd had one last season they'd still have lost those games, since they were lost by the defense. If the offense only repeats last year's production, it'll be good enough to win a national title. The defense just has to get better.
Well, it was not "more than enough" last year.
So, the losses the offensive points...and running:
Michigan State = 41 points (116 by Walker - long 16)
USC = 24 points (72 by Walker - long 20)
OSU = 20 points (90 by Walker - long 20)
Let's look at the opponents and how their main boys rushed against us:
Michigan State = 44 points (63yds/24yds - Teague/Ringer - Long 29/25)
USC = 34 points (160yds - Bush - Long 45)
OSU = 34 points (136/73/66 - Pittman/Ginn/Smith - 60/68/15)
Yards Rushing, Avg Rush, Passing THEM vs US
MSU = 161 vs 107, Avg= 4.5 vs 2.8, (Passing 327 vs 487)
USC = 175 vs 153, Avg= 5.6 vs 2.9, (Passing 301 vs 264)
OSU = 275 vs 62, Avg= 7.6 vs 2.2, (Passing 342 vs 286)
Even when you take out BQ's sacks, we got solidly beaten in the Rushing game.
Crappy MSU. Yes, CRAPPY. Beat us in the Rushing game...
I see a trend. We can put up small consistent yards, but its simply not enough. We need a game breaker to win it all. If that's Walker, fine, he's worked hard enough that I would love to see that.
But a gamebreaker at RB is needed.