Sept 16 | Boston College

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,693
Reaction score
5,992
She was doin it for me too. Def a Rhode Islander. Next time I'm in Cranston I'll let her know i'm in town.

Best part is, I have it on good authority that her "big brother" is more interested in the 2 for $5 at McD's than protecting his sister's virtue.

So can we get back to talking about the hot band nerd Acamp, brick, and myself are gonna run train on?
 

pkt77242

IPA Man
Messages
10,805
Reaction score
719
1) you're being facetious
2) a team is capable of being better than both.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

How about we take a realistic look at this.

Let's get one thing straight GT is Navy with better athletes, of that there is no doubt. If you go full Navy than you won't get top QB's or WR's or TE's or probably OL.

Let's say that ND doesn't go full Navy but some hybrid system similar to Michigan with Denard Robinson or Auburn with Nick Marshall.

Let's look at records
Denard Robinson completed about 50% of his passes. Only including seasons where he was the starting QB.
7-6
11-2* Michigan didn't beat a top 15 team all year.
8-5

Now let's look at Nick Marshall
12-2
8-5

Here is the "thing" though. Nick Marshall was a 60% passer (59.4 & 60.8). Right now Wimbush is a 50% passer, that doesn't cut it even in a hybrid system. I agree that the Auburn system that was employed when Nick Marshall was there could work for ND but it requires the passive game to be competent and so far this year through 3 games that does not describe ND's passing game.

Until the passing game is competent ND will have a hard time against good teams but should be able to handle most average and bad teams. Good athletic defenses will take away the run game if ND is one dimensional. If this offends you than put your big boy pants on.
 
Top