The thread about team speed made me wonder if OL recruiting will change now. ND under Weis had a big line, but they always played sluggish, very prone to the OTs getting beat by speed rushing DEs. Does the spread favor smaller, less lumbering lineman? I thought our huge OL would steamroll teams, but was it the playcalling or the line that was lacking? I haven't followed the spread offense very much. Thoughts.....
first of all, thanks for posting this...I just came from that thread on speed...this seems a constructive spin to that discussion.
I wondered the same thing. I see Utah and Boise state fairly regularly. I'm not an expert on the spread by any means, but have noticed the Lineman are smaller, seem more agile. Also noticed the formation/scheme itself seems to help the QB...it helps him recognize open spots, and get the ball out when the heat is on from the edge...also, it seems to make it harder for an overloaded/conflicted dback/backer to cover for a blitzer. Anyway, I think we'll change our profile of what a tackle is for sure....and that may not be bad.
All-in-all, I don't see us having an imposing offensive line (but as you said, even when we did, we didn't use them)...But, I think our line will actually play better next year...its wide open best I can tell...the scheme seems to say a smaller, more agile guy can realistically beat out the bigger, more classically featured lineman...that means EVERY lineman is in play...and competition every day...can only be good.