Media Matters

[TorontoGold]

LMAO because his book of scrolls had it in there it’s ok he takes the interpretation rigidly. Remember, it’s not hateful, the guy is just a super radical Islamist who believes that jihad is ok! Imagine even trying to justify that line of thinking.

 

[sixstar]

Oh really? I have less restraint and patience? What does that make people who have Bua on ignore? They must be WAY more intolerant than me.

I can promise you I wouldn’t have a public meltdown like Kirk did with Cenk from TYT. I can set up a tent outside a Trump rally, and have neat little clips from emotional outbursts from Joe Dirt, would that make me the preeminent thought leader of the Left?

I didn't mention anything about other people or bua. I mentioned you. You've had numerous meltdowns across your 6.7k posts, with several outbursts, attacking people, calling them names. like i said, if Charlie is hateful, what does that make you?

 

[sixstar]

LMAO because his book of scrolls had it in there it’s ok he takes the interpretation rigidly. Remember, it’s not hateful, the guy is just a super radical Islamist who believes that jihad is ok! Imagine even trying to justify that line of thinking.

Are Palestinians hateful? What is their general consensus on homosexuality and transgenderism? What does the Qur'an say?

Imagine trying to justify the line of thinking that murdering someone is okay because they say things you subjectively deem hateful. interesting.

 

[TorontoGold]

I didn't mention anything about other people or bua. I mentioned you. You've had numerous meltdowns across your 6.7k posts, with several outbursts, attacking people, calling them names. like i said, if Charlie is hateful, what does that make you?

I guess I’m hateful then? I don’t know what your point is. Kirk lost his mind on Cenk from TYT on stage. Not exactly the beacon of composure.

Are Palestinians hateful? What is their general consensus on homosexuality and transgenderism? What does the Qur'an say?

Imagine trying to justify the line of thinking that murdering someone is okay because they say things you subjectively deem hateful. interesting.

Yeah if someone is using their interpretation of their religious text to further prejudicial beliefs then yes they are hateful. I guess the gotcha is that because I don’t believe civilian causalities should be so high in Gaza that I would be ok with radical islamists? I believe that people shouldn't have crippling student debt, do you think my beliefs change because of someone’s voting intention or religious or ethnicity?

Imagine thinking me saying he was a hateful person means that I am justifying his death. Cite exactly where I said it was ok he was murdered. You won’t find it. If the new line of thought policing is saying “calling someone hateful means you want them dead” wouldn’t that kind of be against your whole shtick? If you think something is hateful does that mean you want to kill it? Some insane guy is yelling slurs and being hateful, I guess he deserves to die?

Before being outraged, game out the response a bit so it doesn’t contravene with your free speech absolutist ethos.

 

[sixstar]

slow down, vortex. i didn't accuse you specifically of saying it was okay he was murdered. i'm just trying to follow your logic. read then re-read.
also, i have never claimed to be a free speech absolutist. don't put words in my mouth.

 

[ColoradoIrish]

No hate like Christian love. Using your religion to justify it doesn't make it any less hateful.

 

[sixstar]

No hate like Christian love. Using your religion to justify it doesn't make it any less hateful.

Don't conflate love and acceptance. Don't conflate rebuke with hate.
Example: Parents display love over acceptance when trying to help a drug addicted child get clean.

 

[ColoradoIrish]

Don't conflate love and acceptance. Don't conflate rebuke with hate.
Example: Parents display love over acceptance when trying to help a drug addicted child get clean.

I said what I said and I stand by it.

 

[TorontoGold]

slow down, vortex. i didn't accuse you specifically of saying it was okay he was murdered. i'm just trying to follow your logic. read then re-read.
also, i have never claimed to be a free speech absolutist. don't put words in my mouth.

Imagine trying to justify the line of thinking that murdering someone is okay because they say things you subjectively deem hateful. interesting.

So I’m justifying the line of thinking? What are you accusing me of, at least be man enough to own it.

Yes or no - do you believe that I am justifying his death?

Yes or no - is calling someone hateful a call to action or a signal that someone believes it’s ok to kill that person?

Own it don’t dance around it. Cite the statements.

 

[LifelongFan]

If we would have said three weeks ago […] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks, we would have been called racist. But now they're coming out and they're saying it for us! They're coming out and they're saying, "I'm only here because of affirmative action."

Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

Barack Obama used affirmative action when choosing Michelle Obama as his wife!

 

[Irish#1]

Oh really? I have less restraint and patience? What does that make people who have Bua on ignore? They must be WAY more intolerant than me.

I can promise you I wouldn’t have a public meltdown like Kirk did with Cenk from TYT. I can set up a tent outside a Trump rally, and have neat little clips from emotional outbursts from Joe Dirt, would that make me the preeminent thought leader of the Left?

It doesn't have a thing to do with restraint and patience. It has to do with a poster that calls people names and replies with childish comments rather than replying with something to discuss.

 

[Irish#1]

 

[ozzman]

 

[LifelongFan]

Sorry citizen, you didn't mourn Saint Charlie enough.

 

[LifelongFan]

You must cry every day in public for Saint Charlie and you must buy the Israeli product. This is freedom.

 

[TorontoGold]

It doesn't have a thing to do with restraint and patience. It has to do with a poster that calls people names and replies with childish comments rather than replying with something to discuss.

lol this is so rich. Who said conservatives aren’t funny!

 

[Tejas]

You must cry every day in public for Saint Charlie and you must buy the Israeli product. This is freedom.

If you have some theories I'd love to hear them.

 

[drayer54]

You must cry every day in public for Saint Charlie and you must buy the Israeli product. This is freedom.

Her employer decided not to be associated with that hateful tone. That’s it. That’s the story.

 

[Irish#1]

Sorry citizen, you didn't mourn Saint Charlie enough.

 

[Irish#1]

Can't print or write the name on the cup because it's political. Seems to me that refusing to write the name is also being political. And she does it with such a caring smile. lol

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Citing a Biblical passage of God's law is not hate.

Yes it is.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

So I’m justifying the line of thinking? What are you accusing me of, at least be man enough to own it.

He's a bitch. He won't.

 

[Blazers46]

You must cry every day in public for Saint Charlie and you must buy the Israeli product. This is freedom.

I didn’t realize the Washington Post was a government institution. Freedom is guaranteed by government not your employer. Stop being stupid.

 

[Blazers46]

I said what I said and I stand by it.

You sort of have to stand by it at this point. You’re dug in too deep to be wrong even when wrong.

 

[sixstar]

So I’m justifying the line of thinking? What are you accusing me of, at least be man enough to own it.

Yes or no - do you believe that I am justifying his death?

Yes or no - is calling someone hateful a call to action or a signal that someone believes it’s ok to kill that person?

Own it don’t dance around it. Cite the statements.

you don't understand what I'm trying to say. that's fine. i tried to explain it. if you re-read it without defensiveness, you'll get it. to help you: the statement wasn't directed at you specifically. now re-read.

i'm not accusing you of anything. based on our past discussions, you should know that i've never held punches with you. if i want to accuse you of something, i'll do it. i don't issue thinly veiled statements.

are you justifying his death? no clue - i didn't accuse you of that, and i haven't looked at all of your posts in this thread. i don't care if you are.

is calling someone hateful a call to action? not necessarily to the caller. but certain hearers might perceive the statement as a call to action - even if it wasn't intent of the caller.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

are you justifying his death? no clue

Look at this baby back bitch answer.

 

[TorontoGold]

you don't understand what I'm trying to say. that's fine. i tried to explain it. if you re-read it without defensiveness, you'll get it. to help you: the statement wasn't directed at you specifically. now re-read.

i'm not accusing you of anything. based on our past discussions, you should know that i've never held punches with you. if i want to accuse you of something, i'll do it. i don't issue thinly veiled statements.

are you justifying his death? no clue - i didn't accuse you of that, and i haven't looked at all of your posts in this thread. i don't care if you are.

is calling someone hateful a call to action? not necessarily to the caller. but certain hearers might perceive the statement as a call to action - even if it wasn't intent of the caller.

This is really simple - yes or no, do believe I am justifying his murder.

Yes or no - are you someone who hears “hateful = kill them”.

Yes or no - is it a reasonable position to defend your actions because of a religious text.

 

[sixstar]

This is really simple - yes or no, do believe I am justifying his murder.

Yes or no - are you someone who hears “hateful = kill them”.

Yes or no - is it a reasonable position to defend your actions because of a religious text.

I already answered your first question. Read.
No, I don't hear "hateful = kill them." But I am not all people.
Depends on the religious text, clearly. Outside of the Bible? No, because other religions are false.

 

[LifelongFan]

I didn’t realize the Washington Post was a government institution. Freedom is guaranteed by government not your employer. Stop being stupid.

Government isn't firing them but they are telling people to get them fired. Maybe it's not a first amendment violation but the government says do not criticize our poor Saint Charlie, who is in Valhalla for some reason.

 

[LifelongFan]

not mourning Saint Charlie enough? Hate speech!