calvegas04
Well-known member
- Messages
- 11,931
- Reaction score
- 8,539
Can't wait for all the 2019 hype videos with clips of people talking about ND not belonging in the playoffs.
If Hayes doesnt come back, its definitely not to go to NFL. Hes a back up and his production is null. I'm 95% sure hell be back, but if he isnt, it's likely due to a transfer to get more PT.
But he gets plenty of PT here as the 2nd WDE so I doubt he'd be a flight risk.
No idea on Wilkins, I just think he has to be faster than Boykin.
The problem is Notre Dame...and everyone not named Alabama...NEEDS an elite QB to be a championship level team. Book, love that guy...but he ain't it.
Listening to II podcast, both Prister & Sampson said that while Jurkovec has the superior arm strength & scrambling ability, his accuracy pales in comparison to Book. Until PJ can approach Book’s accuracy, Book is the starter. After all, that’s what gave him the nod over Wimbush after the Vandy game.
10-1 as the QB playing the majority of the game. #6 QBR for the 2018 season in college football. Two QB’s have been in the top 10 for ND in the history of the QBR stat (started 2003). Brady Quinn #10 & #6 in 2005 & 2006. So In the last 15 seasons, Ian Book had one of the best W/L records as a starting QB, had arguably the best season for an ND QB in 15 years as the starting QB according to QBR, and had the 9th beat completion percentage in the entire FBS this season. He’s the starting QB at ND in 2019 & 2020 if he wants to be so get in love with him. If he sucks all of the sudden then maybe PJ could take over but he damn sure earned himself a longer leash than any of BK’s previous QB’s.
10-1 as the QB playing the majority of the game. #6 QBR for the 2018 season in college football. Two QB’s have been in the top 10 for ND in the history of the QBR stat (started 2003). Brady Quinn #10 & #6 in 2005 & 2006. So In the last 15 seasons, Ian Book had one of the best W/L records as a starting QB, had arguably the best season for an ND QB in 15 years as the starting QB according to QBR, and had the 9th beat completion percentage in the entire FBS this season. He’s the starting QB at ND in 2019 & 2020 if he wants to be so get in love with him. If he sucks all of the sudden then maybe PJ could take over but he damn sure earned himself a longer leash than any of BK’s previous QB’s.
Listening to II podcast, both Prister & Sampson said that while Jurkovec has the superior arm strength & scrambling ability, his accuracy pales in comparison to Book. Until PJ can approach Book’s accuracy, Book is the starter. After all, that’s what gave him the nod over Wimbush after the Vandy game.
His completion % dropped every game since Navy. I'm pretty sure his qbr steadily declined over the same span. It may be opposing defenses know how to scheme against him now (eg take away the short passes by crowding the line of scrimmage) or maybe hes the latest QB to regress under Kelly.
Navy was 90.6
NW was 94.1
FSU - out
Cuse which was post rib/kidney was 75.4
USC was 88.1
NW was higher than Navy. Book's season average was 82, and good enough for 6th in the nation. 2 of the games post Navy were above his season average, and 75.4 is still top 25. Long was also opening up the playbook a lot post VT (each game was something a little new), so not a bad trend at all. Clemson was awful though.
Navy was 90.6
NW was 94.1
FSU - out
Cuse which was post rib/kidney was 75.4
USC was 88.1
NW was higher than Navy. Book's season average was 82, and good enough for 6th in the nation. 2 of the games post Navy were above his season average, and 75.4 is still top 25. Long was also opening up the playbook a lot post VT (each game was something a little new), so not a bad trend at all. Clemson was awful though.
And maybe with the combination of more speed at WR, better protection by a more experienced offensive line, and more work throwing the deep ball in the offseason Book can get to the next level.
I mean, I was on this site a few days ago saying I think we need PJ if we want to compete with the elite. I still would personally be very excited if he can beat Book out, as that would make me believe he is the truth.
That said, Book clearly excels in the short passing game. We saw what game breaking speed can do for the short passing game when Fuller was here. How many screens did he take to the house? Boykin, Claypool, Finke are never gonna do that. If we can involve the younger, faster guys, we can still play to Book's strengths and become more explosive in the process. Plus, easier to throw the deep ball to someone like Lenzy than Boykin. Yeah, Boykin has the height and the ball skills, but the throw has to be pretty spot on, he isn't gonna run under just anything you chuck up.
So Book and the O-line had a bad game against the 2nd best team in the country and all of a sudden Phil needs to play?
Not all of the blame should go to O-line for the Clemson game, but Clemson was getting constant pressure which is going to affect Book's play. Sure he bailed too early a few times, but that was due to the pressure and his internal clock telling him to move. I got blasted earlier this year when I said Book was more of a game manager, but that's what he is.
1. Book has a good FB IQ, but this was just his first season. I think you'll see improvement next year.
2. Book doesn't have the arm strength to go deep with any velocity so the game plan is designed around his strengths and avoids his weaknesses. Given human anatomy, you won't see any major improvement in his arm strength next year.
3. I was watching Phill a little during warmups at the Cotton Bowl. The ball jumps off his arm, but his throws weren't precise. The staff won't play Phil over Book if he can't hit the short and intermediate throws. As exciting as the deep ball is, the short and intermediate passes are what loosens up defenses for the run and deep ball.
4. Book came in as a replacement, so the pressure to perform wasn't as great as if he had been the starter all season. It will be interesting to see how he develops.
5. The O-line was young this year. I expect they will be much better next year.
I personally think Book will be #1 next season.
Looks like I was clearly wrong about the QBR. It just felt like Book came in guns blazing then slowly fizzled out later in the year. Which is pretty deflating because I thought he was "the guy" finally (and maybe he still is). I'd just like to see a QB get more effective as time passes under Kelly.
any chance that Jarrett Patterson and Joshua lugg make the starting lineup on the OL in 2019? don't feel that any of the starting OL in 2018 played well enough to guarantee themselves a starting spot next season.
We all saw it happen with Wimbush being benched for Book. Ever since 4-8, we know that Kelly isn't going to hesitate to do something that will make his team compete, players and coaches included. So if PJ is truly better than Book come next season, coach won't hesitate to start him.
I like Hainsey and think he is really good player, but is half a step to slow to play RT. I 100% agree with you that Banks and Hainsey should switch spots. my main concern on the OL next year is center...Is Hainsey really going to be at RT next year? I feel like the should be on the interior and maybe try Banks at RT, or even Lugg.
I like Hainsey and think he is really good player, but is half a step to slow to play RT. I 100% agree with you that Banks and Hainsey should switch spots. my main concern on the OL next year is center...
Banks a massive dude, is he even fast enough to play a tackle position?
Is Hainsey really going to be at RT next year? I feel like the should be on the interior and maybe try Banks at RT, or even Lugg.
Banks a massive dude, is he even fast enough to play a tackle position?
Banks a massive dude, is he even fast enough to play a tackle position?
I was concerned about that as well
Yea seems like more of a road grater than a nimble tackle but maybe I’m wrong
He’s one of the 5 best we have so wherever he fits I’m good with it