My eye test told me that Jacoby looked nice last night. Kept calm in the pocket on a couple big downs, let the plays develop.
TY let him down on a couple (contested) drops.
His final 3rd down (before the 4th conversion, which he dang near got to) his pass to Pascal was pretty dang good given the amount of time he had to let that develop, with the pressure.
His pocket "presence" is pretty high level, already, imo.
Right now, with our crap WRs, I do wish he'd utilize the TEs even more, ala Andrew Luck style.
Once again, his "stats" won't flash like Lucks, but that's because Frank is playing a completely different game and asking Jacoby to avoid risky throws (very secure with the ball).
I have to disagree on most of this. TY didn't let him down. While TY had a chance on both, on the first (crossing pattern) JB's throw was late and bad. TY had to slow which let the DB catch up to him. Had JB led him, that's an easy reception. On the later throw to the right sideline, Doyle was very much wide open and should have got the pass to move the chains.
We returned almost 85% of last year's "receiving" production, which Luck made the #6 receiving unit last year and included Lucks top 4 options (YPG). In addition, we got a healthy Doyle back who was the #2 receiving option in 2017.
I agree our WR is not the most dynamic, but one can not dismiss the regression with most of the same guys. Losing Inman and Grant doesn't take the #6 unit and make them the 25th ish... The QB does. And while his "pocket presence" may be good, his vision is horrible and he struggles through progression. His high time to throw is one of the worst in the NFL (which also adds stress to the OL).
My eye test, and the stat test, both align, and it's just not very good.
Still not on Brissett. Our best WR couldn't catch two critical balls. Our other wideouts are nonexistent.
Give us Will Fuller and DeAndre Hopkins and that game is a bloodbath.
Our best receiving threat are our tight ends. And personally I think it's Jack Doyle who a couple years ago would have like ten reception games and now spends half our possessions on the sideline.
Sent from my SM-J337U using Tapatalk
I put it 50% on Reich, 50% on JB.
If I told you before the game:
1) we would out rush Houston and have a 100 yard rusher, and
2) shut down Houston's running game again, keeping them under 100, and
3) limit Watson to less yards than he had in game 1, and
4) win the turnover battle, and time of possession, and
5) limit their points to under 21
You would absolutely think we won.
Sure we might have won with Hopkins and Fuller. We would have also have won with Watson and our existing receiving unit.... We had guys open all night and JB still forced a lot and made passes...... , and didn't see wide open guys which has been an issue all year. It was so bad a couple times the announcers even called it out.
On Reich... we won game 1 with a 40ish to 25ish pass to rush game plan. In game two, we lost with the exact opposite (25ish passes, 40ish rushes) game plan. How can you not throw more against one of the worst passing Ds in the league, especially when one of their best is out, and a few more are hobbled.
While he's great on TD/INT ratio, almost every other mainstream stat is at the median or below. Some substantially below.