Immigration

[NorthDakota]

No it's not. He was never convicted of a crime. Due process is pretty fucking important.

We've already seen that from Trump.

Unsurprisingly, retards like abc and bishop liked your post

He has criminal convictions.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

He has criminal convictions.

WTF?

 

[NorthDakota]

Why educate yourself? Typical Trump supporting attitude.

Hes a convicted criminal in Minnesota.

Why do you want him to be here so bad?

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Why do you want him to be here so bad?

Why should he NOT be here?

 

[NorthDakota]

WTF?

I know! What the fuck was the Biden administration letting a convicted criminal stay in the country for?

 

[BuaConstrictor]

What the fuck was the Biden administration letting a convicted criminal stay in the country for?

So deport all criminals?

 

[NorthDakota]

Why should he NOT be here?

Because we let him come here and he committed crimes.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Because we let him come here and he committed crimes.

So deport all people with a criminal record?

 

[NorthDakota]

So deport all criminals?

If they aren't US citizens or permanent residents, absolutely.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

If they aren't US citizens or permanent residents

Why should the line be drawn there?

 

[NorthDakota]

Why should the line be drawn there?

Those people have a right to be here

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Those people have a right to be here

Says who?

 

[NorthDakota]

Says who?

Me? Idk what you are trying to get at here.

 

[GATTACA!]

He has criminal convictions.

No he doesn't.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Idk what you are trying to get at here.

Yes you do. It's why you answered the question so idiotically.

Who gives those people a right to be here?

Bonus question: What level/severity of criminality should make a person eligible for deportation?

 

[BuaConstrictor]

No he doesn't.

The guy from Minnesota does. Abrego does not. These morons keep jumping around from case to case.

 

[NorthDakota]

Yes you do. It's why you answered the question so idiotically.

Who gives those people a right to be here?

Bonus question: What level/severity of criminality should make a person eligible for deportation?

Why do citizens have a right to be here? What an odd question. I suppose because they are from here.

Bonus answer: any and every crime should make people eligible for deportation. Whether the administration chooses to follow through should be up to them.

 

[Irish#1]

Why do citizens have a right to be here? What an odd question. I suppose because they are from here.

Bonus answer: any and every crime should make people eligible for deportation. Whether the administration chooses to follow through should be up to them.

POY quality.

 

[NorthDakota]

The guy from Minnesota does. Abrego does not. These morons keep jumping around from case to case.

Abrego is an illegal immigrant. He's a criminal.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

What an odd question.

It's a very specific question. Which you have not answered correctly.

any and every crime should make people eligible for deportation.

What about crimes that are dismissed?


What is YOUR personal threshold?

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Abrego is an illegal immigrant. He's a criminal.

He has no criminal record.

 

[NorthDakota]

It's a very specific question.


What about crimes that are dismissed?


What is YOUR personal threshold?

It was answered.

Dismissed? Interesting hypo. I don't think it should matter if it was dismissed. Criminal charges are dismissed all the time for a variety of reasons.

I already provided my threshold.

 

[NorthDakota]

He has no criminal record.

Coming to the US illegally is a crime.

OJ was a murderer. His criminal record said otherwise.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

It was answered.

Wasn't answered correctly.

I already provided my threshold.

No you haven't. You said it should be up to the administration to enforce it.

What would YOU personally enforce? What level of crimes?

I don't think it should matter if it was dismissed. Criminal charges are dismissed all the time for a variety of reasons.

So it's no longer a criminal conviction issue. Glad you've now moved the goal posts off that point.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Coming to the US illegally is a crime.

Has he been convicted of it?

OJ was a murderer.

Correct. We have a civil jury to thank for proving that.

 

[NorthDakota]

Has he been convicted of it?

Correct. We have a civil jury to thank for proving ththat.

I don't need a conviction to call him a criminal lol.

And no, the civil trial was about wrongful death. Not murder.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

I don't need a conviction to call him a criminal

You do. That's the point.

And no, the civil trial was about wrongful death. Not murder.

How was the wrongful death committed?

What would YOU personally enforce? What level of crimes?

 

[NorthDakota]

Wasn't answered correctly.


No you haven't. You said it should be up to the administration to enforce it.

What would YOU personally enforce? What level of crimes?


So it's no longer a criminal conviction issue. Glad you've now moved the goal posts off that point.

It was answered correctly.

Yes, it should be up to the administration. That depends on resources, which side of the bed the decision maker woke up on that day, is this a hot latina or some fat filipino guy, etc.

If you want to ask more and more specific things you'll get more specific answers. Thats not moving goalposts. Convictions certainly make things more black/white but it doesn't really matter to me.

Frankly it should not even be limited to criminal charges. These people don't have a right to be here. We don't have to let them stay. If the administration thinks some 30 year old foreign doctoral student is a commie, send him back lol.

 

[NorthDakota]

You do. That's the point.


How was the wrongful death committed?

What would YOU personally enforce? What level of crimes?

Nope. People didn't start rightfully calling OJ a murderer after he got found liable for wrongful death. If that's what they were waiting for they are not very bright people.

All crimes. We've been over this several times.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

It was answered correctly.

It absolutely was not. One does not need to be "from here" to be a citizen or LPR.

So..try again.

Thats not moving goalposts.

It is.

Frankly it should not even be limited to criminal charges.

So now criminal charges don't even matter. Convictions, charges, none of it matters.

If the administration thinks some 30 year old foreign doctoral student is a commie, send him back lol.

Oh, so now we are fine with "thought police".