Environmental Issues

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Coal Ash and Sewage Spill Over as Florence Floods the Carolinas
(Bloomberg)

A Duke Energy Corp. landfill near Wilmington, North Carolina, failed under the assault of Tropical Depression Florence, spilling about 2,000 cubic yards of coal ash that can carry toxic mercury, arsenic and lead. Authorities said they would investigate whether the pollutant had reached the Cape Fear River, but said it wasn’t yet safe to inspect the site.

Flooding from Hurricane Florence Threatens to Overwhelm Manure Lagoons (New Yorker)

On any given day, there are about six million hogs in North Carolina. The vast majority of them are confined in buildings, in what are known as concentrated animal-feeding operations. According to research conducted by Mark Sobsey, a professor of environmental sciences and engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, farmed hogs, which can weigh in excess of two hundred and fifty pounds, create as much as ten times the fecal waste produced by humans. (The hog industry disputes Sobsey’s conclusion.) Other environmental groups say that hogs only create five times as much shit. Regardless, eastern North Carolina, which is being drenched to unprecedented levels by Hurricane Florence this week, is “literally the cesspool of the United States,” Rick Dove, a senior adviser to the Waterkeeper Alliance, a nonprofit environmental group, told me. “You can’t describe it any other way. And flooding from this hurricane is making it even more obvious.”

That waste is collected in what are somewhat euphemistically called lagoons. The hogs defecate on slatted floors inside their confinement buildings and push their waste through the slats into a system that empties into an outdoor cesspool. “It’s an uncovered, open-air pit lined only with clay,” Dove said. There are about four thousand lagoons across the state, many near the coast. Dove lives near New Bern, North Carolina, on a bluff safely above the currently rising Neuse River. “The waste bakes in the hot summer sun every year,” he said. “It smells terrible. And when the lagoon fills up, they suck it out and spray it on fields, ostensibly as fertilizer. Though I’d debate that.” He added, “They’re just trying to lower that lagoon.”

After Hurricane Matthew in 2016, which dumped 17 inches on North Carolina:

Factory farming practices are under scrutiny again in N.C. after disastrous hurricane floods (Wash Post, Oct 16, 2016)

Hundreds of hog and poultry farms may have been inundated last week as the Neuse, Lumber and Tar rivers roared over their banks, a rampage powered by the deluge of Hurricane Matthew. The carcasses of several thousand drowned hogs and several million drowned chickens and turkeys were left behind. An incalculable amount of animal waste was carried toward the ocean. Along the way, it could be contaminating the groundwater for the many people who rely on wells in this part of the state, as well as threatening the delicate ecosystems of tidal estuaries and bays.
imrs.php


During Hurricane Floyd in 1999, hog lagoons across the eastern part of North Carolina broke open and dumped tons of liquid and solid waste into the storm waters. That material flowed downstream, eventually settling in coastal estuaries. It was blamed for elevated nitrogen and phosphorous levels, algae blooms and fish kills, remembers Travis Graves, an environmental scientist and member of the Waterkeepers Alliance.

“The lesson that we should’ve learned with all the hurricanes coming through here – that these animal factories should not be in harm’s way – is one that we keep learning over and over and over again. And we have asked the governor to get these animal factories out of the flood plain and adjacent land to the flood plain, and they have refused.”
 
Last edited:

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,972
Reaction score
6,462
We'll never grow up on building dangerous polluting operations in hazardous zones anymore than we'll grow up about destroying all the best farmlands for suburban homes "in the floodplains."

A hazard in the future is no hazard to most of us human idiots, and a depletion of the Commons is no concern, since we are no community. "We" are "I" and "I" stand alone.

Don't tread on me. "I" got rights.

Responsibilities? What the He!l are those?
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Dallas Morning News has some insightful articles on Permian Basin oil and gas (Business/Energy).

A couple relevant for this thread:'
Disposal nightmare': In Permian Basin, every barrel of oil means four barrels of toxic water (originally Bloomberg News)

Excerpt:
Disposal nightmare
Overall, the region will pull up enough water this year alone to cover all of Rhode Island nearly a foot deep. Wall Street is well aware of the threats posed by the Permian Basin's pipeline and labor shortages, key side effects from the region's rapid buildup. But investors "aren't as well apprised of some of the other risks and challenges that could be just as material, if not more so," said Gabriel Collins, a fellow in energy and the environment at Rice University.

"I'd put water right at the top of that list," he said

How material? Spending on water management in the Permian Basin is likely to nearly double to more than $22 billion in just five years, according to industry consultant IHS Markit. The reason is twofold. The rig count is rising, and many of the "workhorse" disposal formations used for decades are starting to fill up, said Laura Capper, an industry consultant. That means explorers have to move water further to find a home for it.

It's a problem "that's just going to get bigger and bigger," said Wood Mackenzie analyst Ryan Duman, "Operators are victims of their own success."

Drillers generally flush excess water back into the ground, often after trucking it to areas such as the San Andres, a region of the basin largely drilled-out early on in the shale boom. But now, with the boom hitting historic levels, that system is running into headwinds.

In the San Andres, wells sunk to gather oil deeper within the play are collapsing as a result of the increased pressure from water injections, causing dozens to be closed and the loss of miles of pipe, according to Andrew Hunter, a drilling engineer at Blackstone Energy Partners-backed Guidon Energy.

It's a situation that's "getting worse," Hunter said at a recent conference on water held in Houston. "I think people are afraid to talk about this problem. We're trying to get the word out to let everyone know how serious this is."

At the same time, earthquakes in parts of West Texas and New Mexico that include the Permian have more than tripled to 62 with at least a 2.5 magnitude in the past year, from just six two years earlier, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. That's data environmentalists are quick to blame on the injections, pointing to studies on similar activity in Oklahoma.


As pipelines fill up, will Texas let Permian Basin drillers burn more natural gas? (Originally, "Wire Services")

Excerpt:
Environmental impact

Going hand-in-hand with the financial questions are those revolving around the possible effect of more flaring on air quality.

Flaring releases toxic compounds like cancer-causing benzene and matter that is linked to respiratory illnesses, according to the Environmental Defense Fund, which is against increasing the duration.

Suzanne Franklin, 67, and her husband, James, can see 17 flares breathing fire into the sky from the front porch of their ranch in Reeves County. The visible pollution has definitely impacted their life. "We used to go out and look up at the stars," she said. "Now, you don't see any stars."

She believes the flaring has affected her breathing. Since the first flare was lit up about a year ago, her doctor has put her on three different medicines "just to breath right."

Seven counties in the region already rank in the top 10 nationwide for childhood asthma attacks, according to the Clean Air Task Force. More flaring could increase that dubious standing, according to Colin Leyden, the fund's senior manager of regulatory and legislative affairs.

A Duke University analysis:
Water use for fracking has risen by up to 770 percent since 2011

wateruseforf.jpg
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
I've shared how Trump administration officials or close ties have benefited from energy regulation changes. Icahn was appointed by Trump as "special advisor on regulation" policy.

Carl Icahn's refinery investment has rebounded by $1.4 billion, boosted by Trump energy policy (CNBC)

--Shares of CVR Energy have more than doubled since August, resulting in a $1.4 billion paper gain for Carl Icahn, who holds an 82-percent stake in the company.

--CVR Energy's stock price slumped through much of last year as it became clear EPA would not adopt a policy proposal put forward by Icahn that would benefit the the company.

--However, CVR Energy and its peers in the refining sector have since benefited from EPA's willingness to grant financial hardship waivers to small refineries.
Carl Icahn's refinery investment stumbled last year as the activist investor's push to overhaul U.S. energy policy stalled. However, that investment has now rebounded to the tune of more than $1 billion.

While Icahn's unsuccessful bid to change federal refinery rules indirectly dented the investment last year, the turnaround has been helped by the Trump administration's willingness to offer regulatory relief to the nation's oil refiners.

In recent months, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has granted about two dozen hardship waivers that allow small refineries to avoid tens of millions of dollars in costs tied to a federal biofuels program.

The Oklahoma refinery linked to Icahn received one of the exemptions, according to Reuters, but the benefit of the exemptions goes far beyond a waiver for a single facility. The EPA's approach has slashed the price of complying with federal rules for all refiners, cutting expenses at a time when lower crude oil costs are boosting profit margins.

"A lot of these refiners have the best of both worlds," said Tom Kloza, global head of energy analysis at Oil Price Information Service. "They're seeing much wider refining margins than last year, and they're seeing much lower compliance costs."

Shares of CVR Energy, the refining and fertilizer business Icahn controls, have more than doubled since August, when the stock hit a 52-week low. Up to that point in the year, the stock price had slumped more than 30 percent as investors lost hope that President Donald Trump's EPA would overhaul federal policy to benefit refiners.

The change in the stock price through Thursday amounts to a $1.4 billion gain on paper for Icahn, who holds an 82 percent stake in CVR Energy.

The unit price for CVR Refining, a master limited partnership that manages CVR Energy's refining assets, has run up even more on a percentage basis. Its up about 150 percent since its August low. CVR Energy holds a two-thirds stake in CVR Refining, while Icahn Associates controls nearly 4 percent of the MLP's units.

The reversal of fortune caps a challenging year for Icahn, who stepped down as a regulatory adviser to Trump in August after coming under scrutiny for seeking to overhaul federal rules that would directly benefit CVR Energy. In November, federal prosecutors subpoenaed Icahn as they sought information about the advisory role....
The amount of sleeze and lack of ethics in this Administration is incalculable.

Carl Icahn resigned from Trump advisor role ahead of article alleging conflict of interest (CNBC)
--Billionaire investor Carl Icahn left his role as a special advisor to President Donald Trump on Friday
--That came ahead of the release of a critical magazine article detailing Icahn's potential conflicts of interest and questioning whether he had acted illegally
--In December, CNBC reported on the potential conflicts Icahn faced because of his stake in refiner CVR Energy
And in a personal defense, Icahn wrote in his resignation: "I never had a formal position with your administration nor a policymaking role. And contrary to the insinuations of a handful of your Democratic critics, I never had access to nonpublic information or profited from my position, nor do I believe that my role presented conflicts of interest."

"Indeed, out of an abundance of caution, the only issues I ever discussed with you were broad matters of policy affecting the refining industry. I never sought any special benefit for any company with which I have been involved, and have only expressed views that I believed would benefit the refining industry as a whole," he added.

Still, former White House ethics lawyers had told CNBC that Icahn's appointment to the informal role, given his stake in refiner CVR Energy, represented a conflict of interest and could have put him at risk of violating conflicts laws.

The rule in question requires refiners to blend ethanol, a renewable fuel, into gasoline. In an interview on CNBC's "Fast Money: Halftime Report," Icahn said the Environmental Protection Agency should immediately revoke part of the rule that requires refiners that cannot blend ethanol into gasoline to buy credits instead.

If Icahn's advice in his capacity as special advisor on regulation contributed to such a repeal, he would have inherently aided in removing a disadvantage for CVR Energy. Repeal of the regulation could have potentially boosted CVR's stock price and enrich Icahn.

EPA
Pruitt's overseas travel pulls Icahn LNG money into focus
(EE News)

A December trip to Morocco by EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt could benefit Carl Icahn, an activist investor who holds a controlling stake in the largest U.S. natural gas exporter and who helped Pruitt secure his position in President Trump's Cabinet.

Icahn, made famous as a corporate raider in the 1980s, captured Houston-based Cheniere Energy Inc. through aggressive stock buys in 2015, using his holdings to force out Cheniere's founder and CEO, Charif Souki. He quickly remade the company's management, which he had accused of taking outsized risks, and directed Cheniere to get its Gulf Coast liquefied natural gas export terminals up and running.
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Major Climate Report Describes a Strong Risk of Crisis as Early as 2040 (Report linked in article)

Trump Ignores The Impacts Of Climate Change At His Peril -- And Ours Forbes

The Economist Intelligence Unit has estimated that, left unabated, climate change will cost the global economy $43 trillion in today's prices, points out Steve Waygood, chief responsible investment officer at Aviva Investors. “This is not a risk we can afford to take,” he says. “Keeping global temperature increases to 1.5°C will help safeguard our investment portfolios and protect our customers savings. The long term negative financial consequences of climate change are far, far greater than the short-term financial risks of transitioning to the Paris Agreement.”
(Report linked)
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
We are in dangerous times. Trump views everything through a near-sighted capitalist lens. He's going to help us continue stripping and polluting this planet at an increased rate. Who knows what the world will look in the years to come.

Global warming as due to fossil fuels is the one issue that most everyone can agree transcends national borders as a worsening planetary danger that will affect generations and all forms of life on earth until recent policy changes have made it political.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Energy companies are initiating Green Tariff programs to supply renewable energy to major corporations through ten year virtual power purchasing contracts. Seventy-one of the Fortune 500 corporations currently have renewable energy targets. Twenty-two have goals to have all their energy from renewable sources.

Utility Green Tariffs (EPA)

These need to pass state regulations. An explanation of these tariffs is listed under the EPA site. Utility Green Tariffs
A number of these corporations sat on Trump's Technology Council that was disbanded. The Administration has made a commitment to increase the use of fossil fuels and regulated power companies to keep coal as their emergency backup despite the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) unanimously rejecting that plan. Green power initiatives are shifted away from federal to state initiatives and corporate demands.

Georgia Power and Duke Energy are a couple of the latest power companies who have initiated green tariff programs. Duke is targeting South Carolina, whose $9 billion investment in a nuclear power plant that have been closed and never completed. A nuclear power plant in Georgia was also shut down prior to completion. Ga and S.C. taxpayers are on the hook for the costs for years to come, and which has become an issue in the S.C. Governors race. Duke partially attributes their plan to state legislation.

Duke proposes 150 MW green tariff program for South Carolina C&I customers

Georgia Power kicks off “green tariff” program with 177 MW of solar projects

Virtual contracts drive a boom in corporate renewables procurement

Duke Energy’s new nuke plant may never be built. It could still cost customers $500M.
 
Last edited:

fightingirish26

Well-known member
Messages
3,906
Reaction score
1,916
Absolutely outrageous. Earth is over 4 billion years old. Humans managed to live 200k years without destroying everything. Things need to change, immediately. Earth does not belong to us.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">New report - global vertebrate populations (mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish) declined 60% from 1970-2014 <a href="https://t.co/Ptc5sldXGU">https://t.co/Ptc5sldXGU</a></p>— WWF News (@WWFnews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WWFnews/status/1057060404537507840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 30, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
In a Twitter post last weekend, the President said the president said that “there is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor.” and threatened to withhold federal funds.

His suggestion?

"I was with the President of Finland and he said we have -- much different -- we are a forest nation. He called it a forest nation. And they spend a lot of time on raking and cleaning and doing things, and they don't have any problem. And when it is, it's a very small problem. So I know everybody's looking at that to that end."

Trump also told Fox News' Chris Wallace during an interview last week,
"I was watching the firemen the other day, and they were raking areas, they were raking areas where the fire was right over there. And they're raking ... little bushes, that you could see are totally dry, weeds. And they're raking them -- they're on fire.
That should have been all raked out and cleaned out. You wouldn't have the fire."

Many of California's fires like the Camp and Woolsey fires are vegetation fires, starting in shrub and brush whipped by winds, and near suburban areas not near forests.

Now Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke who is in charge of those forest management policies blames "radical environmentalists".

California fires: Trump administration now blames devastation on 'radical environmentalists'

Zinke said, after observing that the amount of fuel in the forest is at "historic highs” due to drought and beetle kills. “We know the problem. It’s been years of neglect, and in many cases it’s been these radical environmentalists that want nature to take its course.…You know what? This is on them.”

California has 33 million acres of overgrown forests which do pose a fire threat. About 60 percent of that 33 million acres is owned by the federal government and managed according to Interior Department's forest management policies.

Congress in March passed the Wildfire Suppression Act signed into law by President Trump, providing funding for the U.S. Forest Service agency $3.2 billion to spend fighting wildfires this year and another lump sum next year. Starting in 2020, the wildfire budget will be fixed at $1.1 billion but the agency will be able to tap into about $2.2 billion to pay for catastrophic wildfires. That $2.2 billion cap climbs to nearly $3 billion by 2027. In 1990, the Forest Service spent about 13 percent of its budget on wildfires. Last year it reached 55 percent at $2.4 billion. So this funding will free up much of the Forest Service's budget for non-wildfire related work and services - and is not funding that could be withheld by Trump.
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Utah has some of the most beautiful and historic land areas in the U.S. The Salt Lake Tribune articles reflects Utahans' cultural values as well as news and has environment articles reporting on the continuing discoveries and commitment to preservation. Here are a few (under their Environment section).

Utah coal mine keeps emitting methane a decade after it ceased operations

Lords of the rings: Four Utah trees reign as the oldest of their kind — and they provide peeks at the past, clues to the future

A search for an ancient crocodile in Utah’s Bears Ears leads to a major discovery of Triassic fossils

Remember the Antiquities Act Trump despised when he shrank Utah’s Grand Staircase and Bears Ears? Well, he just used that law to create a monument.

They also cover issues involving old mines, oil and gas leases and drilling, water-rights, private vs. public land issues, climate change impacts, etc.

and one originally from AP
Government climate report warns of worsening U.S. disasters
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Port Aransas may be the most scenic and beautiful costal area of Texas. The Texas coast is becoming the epicenter of the expected boom in shipment of fossil fuels overseas. Locals don't want it.

Surge of oil and gas flowing to Texas coastline triggers building boom, tensions (Texas Tribune)
For Texas ports, the rise in oil and gas exports is a windfall. For some communities, it’s not so simple.

How a new oil boom is transforming West Texas, sending U.S. oil around the world and threatening efforts to fight climate change. MORE IN THIS SERIES
PORT ARANSAS — To the east, the Gulf of Mexico stretches out, blue-green and sparkling. To the west and north, flounder and trout meander in a chain of bays. People flock here to fish. Others come to this beach town near Corpus Christi to kayak, parasail or admire the hundreds of bird species on the barrier island, which is deep into rebuilding efforts after Hurricane Harvey damaged or destroyed 85 percent of the buildings here last year.

A perfect location, from a certain point of view, to put not one but two crude-oil export terminals for ships so big they’re called supertankers.

Those proposals are part of a historic buildout of oil and gas infrastructure in the United States as it becomes a top exporter of both fuels. Texas, home to the most prolific oilfield in the country, is at the epicenter of the frenzy. More than 80 plants, terminals and other projects are in the works or planned up and down the state’s Gulf Coast, from Port Arthur to Brownsville, according to a Center for Public Integrity and Texas Tribune review of corporate plans. Companies have been laying enough pipeline in Texas in the last several years to stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific three times over, more than 8,000 miles in all.

Oil and gas production in the U.S. has skyrocketed, particularly in the Permian Basin, most of which underlies West Texas. Producers there are employing new drilling technologies to meet — some would say prolong — the global demand for fossil fuels. When Congress lifted decades-old federal restrictions on crude exports at the end of 2015, a move that came on the heels of rule changes throwing open the doors for exports of natural gas, it set off a mad dash. Companies want to get oil and gas from West Texas to the Gulf Coast and, from there, abroad.

Much of the infrastructure is headed for just two regions: Houston — America’s oil capital — and Corpus Christi, where a port previously focused on oil imports is battling it out with Houston to be the country’s No. 1 location for moving crude to other nations. Each shipped out more than $7 billion in crude during the first nine months of the year, up from less than $1 billion two years earlier, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures. Terminals once used to bring oil in are pushing it the other direction.

(See Graphics for pipelines, processing hubs, and export facilities)

“At the end of 2015 ... we had the first shipment of crude that was exported,” said John LaRue, executive director of the Port of Corpus Christi. “And now, as I’m sure you know, it’s a constant surge.”

Oil and gas export growth means jobs paying good wages. In Corpus Christi, it’s responsible for roughly 800 new positions so far with another 1,600 expected in the next four years, plus several thousand temporary jobs constructing all those facilities, according to an analysis by Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi’s Jim Lee.

But it also intensifies a tragic quandary bedeviling the Gulf. Heavy industry there pumps out greenhouse gases warming the climate, upping the risks of powerful storms that, in turn, endanger those same facilities and everything around them. Harvey, which dumped more rain than any other U.S. storm on record, damaged hundreds of thousands of homes in Texas last year, killed at least 68 people and, particularly around Houston, sparked industrial spills, air pollution and explosion.

Many of the proposed, under-construction or recently built facilities along the Texas Gulf are in areas that felt Harvey’s bite. Just in the Corpus Christi region, those projects include about nine new or expanding crude oil terminals, a liquefied natural gas terminal, two refined petroleum products terminals and several plants for processing a component of natural gas into a building block of plastic products. Two of those plants, each approved for tens of millions of dollars in tax breaks, are expected to be among the largest of their kind in the world. And roughly seven pipelines are planned or under way to move more oil and gas here from western and southern Texas.

The Corpus Christi liquefied natural gas terminal — which just began operations and already has expansions planned — received permits to release up to 5.8 million tons of greenhouse gases each year, according to an analysis by the Environmental Integrity Project, a research and advocacy group. That’s the equivalent of nearly 1 ½ coal-fired power plants. Other parts of this new supply chain, which extends into the Louisiana side of the Gulf, will facilitate greenhouse gases pumped out in Asia, Europe and beyond.

“There is some irony or poetic justice, depending on your point of view, in having all these greenhouse-gas emitters being the most vulnerable to climate change, but there are a lot of people living around them, and it’s not such a good deal for them,” said Eric Schaeffer, executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project and a former head of civil enforcement at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The development boom also sets up a clash over the future of the mid-Gulf, a less industrial and more tourism-focused part of the Texas coast than Houston.

From the Port of Corpus Christi’s perspective, the new export business is a huge plus. “You’re going to see more development, more industry, more jobs,” said Eddie Martinez, the port’s business development representative, as he cruised in a boat along the ship channel in June, passing oil tankers and new projects.

But as the growth spills beyond the port’s industrial spine, it’s upending some communities.

The idea of building crude-oil terminals in Port Aransas to serve ships extending the length of four football fields — requiring a much deeper ship channel in that area — has residents and business owners there up in arms.

“Everyone I speak to says they’re against this,” said Neesy Tompkins, who moved to town in 1978 after falling in love with its natural beauty.

“What they’re proposing is an environmental disaster,” said John Donovan, who lives part-time in town and helped form a new group, the Port Aransas Conservancy, that is pressing back on the oil-terminal proposals.

This type of development boom on the coast isn’t unprecedented, but it hasn’t happened for decades, said Michael Webber, acting director of the Energy Institute at the University of Texas at Austin. World War II kicked off a building spree that extended into the 1950s, he said. This time around, soaring production is the trigger. In the Permian Basin, companies are extracting double the amount of crude oil and natural gas they did four years ago.

“We’re seeing massive buildout,” Webber said. “Export infrastructure, chemical infrastructure, you name it.” (more)

The tradeoff is lower state revenue due to massive tax breaks.
Expanding ports, shrinking neighborhoods.

The Port of Beaumont didn’t export a drop of crude oil in 2015. This year through September, the Texas seaport near the Louisiana state line moved out nearly $6 billion worth — almost three times the amount it shipped during the same months last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

All but one of the top 10 ports for crude shipped abroad are on the Gulf Coast, most in Texas. Beaumont is behind only Corpus Christi and Houston as they vie for first place. Related exports are also rising, from refined oil to propane and other liquids that come with natural gas production. And around the Port of Brownsville alone, companies have proposed a trio of terminals to export liquefied natural gas, known as LNG.

Parts of the new export supply chain, particularly the LNG terminals, are getting big tax breaks to locate along the coast. The LNG facility under construction in Freeport, about 70 miles south of Houston, will avoid more than half a billion dollars in taxes over the 10-year lifespan of its agreements with three school districts, according to the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. That’s a more than 75-percent break.

Dale Craymer, president of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, whose membership includes companies receiving such breaks, said the state must compete for export facilities with its Gulf Coast neighbor. Louisiana has a lower property tax rate and offers an automatic, 10-year break on property taxes.

But in Dick Lavine’s view, schools are giving up much-needed revenue from projects that “very likely would have located there without an incentive.” Lavine, a senior fiscal analyst for the left-leaning Center for Public Policy Priorities, an Austin-based think tank, said the obvious place to put an oil or gas export facility is on the coast of the state at the heart of the U.S. drilling boom. Companies planning to build two of the LNG terminals in Brownsville did not pick new sites when they were turned down for tax breaks by a school district, a sign that at least some deal-sweeteners aren’t necessary.

As noted in prior information shared, taxpayers will shoulder the burden of funding schools, healthcare, etc. due to the tax breaks given the multi-national corporations. Also of concern to local businesses in addition to environmental air quality and the potential for an environmental disaster is that current low natural gas prices will rise as more LNG is shipped overseas where the prices for LNG are higher, which will raise prices and costs.
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
How federal agencies' statutory responsibilities have been circumvented in the rush to exploit natural gas reserves will wait for another time. Suffice it to say, much of the responsibility for protecting their environments have fallen to the states. Mike provides a good segue to a look at West Virginia politics and government and their involvements in natural gas.

While I'll agree with the accusation of many environmentalists not being able to effectively communicate their vision and practical concepts, the main problem lies elsewhere --- in the "simple" observation that we do not live in a functional democracy.

I don't know how many people think that they have a real say in governmental actions, but my experience with local government is pretty clear: the public's opinion rarely is worth sh!t. Typically "money" comes in and presents a plan. Many levels of governance will have procedures which allegedly allow everyday citizens to look at these plans and there are "public meetings" where opinions, worries, and even data is heard. The overseeing board or committee or whoever then allegedly placates public concern with something which seems sort of to address their concerns. The public goes away (which is the governmental goal) somewhat disappointed but maybe thinking that the worst hasn't happened.

If the allegedly agreed upon plan/design does not meet "Money's" ideal program, they will later apply/inform government that some "adjustments" are to be made "but the plan is essentially the same" (which it is not.) Government, now hand-in-pocket with its new partner, agrees to a "go", often without a notification nor second public forum. Building/development/whatever begins apace and the public is once again surprised that the alleged plan has been violated.

-- The Speaker of West Virginia's House is Roger Hanshaw, a Republican lawyer from Clay County with the Charleston-based firm Bowles Rice, where his clients have included natural gas companies and gas industry lobby groups. Last year, Hanshaw engineered passage of a bill that gave natural gas companies a broad exemption from chemical tank safety standards that West Virginia put in place after a 2014 spill into the Elk River that contaminated drinking water for 300,000 people. As Speaker Hanshaw can guide bills through to passage or let other bills languish. This year a bill was moving through the West Virginia House of Delegates to limit legal challenges that had slowed new natural gas-fired power plants in the state. Hanshaw got his BA and JD from W.Virginia and a Ph.D. in chemistry from Notre Dame.

-- One of his partners at Bowles Rice is Sen. Corey Palumbo, D-Kanawha, whose practice areas include “oil and gas litigation,” according to the law firm’s website. Palumbo has litigated against landowners on behalf of gas producers, and was the co-sponsor of an unsuccessful bill to make it harder for residents to sue gas companies for damaging their property.

-- More than a dozen lawmakers during the 2018 regular session listed some financial connection to the gas industry on their annual disclosure forms filed with the state Ethics Commission. Delegate Moore Capito, a Kanawha County Republican, for example, reported on his financial disclosure that he is an in-house counsel for Greylock Energy, a gas company. Moore Capito is the son of U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito.

-- West Virginia’s ethics laws allow legislators to vote on matters that would benefit themselves, their businesses and their clients. In fact, a House policy, known as Rule 49, forces them to vote, so long as at least four others also stand to benefit. So even if one of the twelve lawmakers wanted to recuse him/herself, they would be instructed to vote on a natural gas bill because more than four other lawmakers would also benefit.

-- One of W.Va's Supreme Court Justices, Beth Walker, voted to reopen an already decided - when she was not a Justice - a Supreme Court ruling that would have forced drillers to pay more in profits to residents. The case focused on whether natural gas companies are allowed to deduct a variety of expenses when they calculate payments for West Virginia residents or companies that lease them drilling rights to their gas. Millions of dollars in gas royalty payments were at stake. After the court reopened the case, they reversed their previous ruling siding with the industry and against the residents. Her husband owned stock in a variety of energy companies benefiting from the development of natural gas. She will become W.Va's Supreme Court's Chief Justice on Jan 1.

-- As an example of a community attempting to act in - as Mike says - a "functional democracy", One West Virginia County Tried to Break Its Dependence on the Energy Industry. It Was Overruled.
and a follow-up article: Natural Gas Industry Again Beats a Tiny West Virginia County That Wanted to Control Its Destiny

-- A group of landowners are asking the Supreme Court to hear their challenge to pipleline companies seizing land under eminent domain to build their pipeline. The District Court and the Court of Appeals have decided against the landowners.

-- Finally, this article details numerous actions that the state agencies tasked with enforcing the nation’s environmental laws and its regulators have rewritten rules of agencies or dropped reviews that would negatively impact pipeline builders permits. Regulators change the rules to ease pipeline approval

Articles and sources are from the Charleston Gazette-Mail and ProPublica.
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
This caught my eye. It seemed unusual for Texas landowners living near the Permian Basin and familiar with Kinder-Morgan, which are a source of so much oil and gas exploration and so many jobs, to object to a new major pipeline through their area despite assurances.

Gas pipeline plans rankle Hill Country landowners (Austin Statesman)

But residents are also aware of:
Texas Tribune: Explosions from unregulated pipelines can kill in Texas while energy companies go unpunished (Texans For Property Rights)

Landowner rights issue has spilled over into the Texas legislature.
Texas Tribune: GOP senator, oil industry clash over proposed eminent domain reforms (Texans For Property Rights)


In other pipeline developments,
Pennsylvania permits halted for Texas-based pipeline company (AP)

The Trump Administration badly wants a NG terminal on the West Coast at Coos Bay in Oregon. Locals don't.
Tens of thousands weigh in on Jordan Cove LNG terminal and pipeline permit
(Oregon Live)
 
Last edited:

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,972
Reaction score
6,462
To Legacy: citizens are willing to go along with business when their own economic lives are rough or threatened --- but once they think that they are doing OK with the Status Quo, they prefer no one messing around with their lives. If this is "just another money-maker" for someone who doesn't even live there, then NIMBY arises and citizens get organized to stop the "change" if it (right or wrong) is perceived as having risk or restriction.

I saw this all the time in my earlier days as a ENVS prof. Relatively good folks would cave to business when it was economic, and completely NON-green folks would scream loudly if they were already dollars-OK and this was in their back yard. I'm not at all surprised that Texans act the same way.

Businesses happily attempt to maximize their own thrival --- that is all they are programmed to do, being overly-powerful but simplistic organisms. Individuals try to thrive too. The country was set up to, theoretically, give citizens the say. In this legal age of businesses defined as having court standing, we don't --- except if we can make the "Life" argument from Life >> Liberty >> Pursuit of Happiness (now defined as wealth.) Business must argue Wealth, but citizens can attempt to counter with "Life/ Health Risks." NIMBY always comes down to that. ... and the rest of the country, who are not threatened because they don't live there, mock the NIMBY-ites instead of supporting their fellow citizens fighting like Dwarves versus Giants.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,947
Reaction score
11,225
Mike Lee reminded me a lot of Alan Greyson, and that's not a good thing.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,591
Reaction score
20,046
Already a big problem in the Everglades, this could become bigger given the populations of raccoons, opossums and bobcats have fallen by between 88%


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/07/hunters-capture-largest-python-florida-everglades

Snake's 'boyfriend’ leads hunters to largest python in Florida Everglades

Snake hunters have captured what they say is the largest python ever found in the swamps of the Florida Everglades: a pregnant female more than 17ft (5.2 metres) long and weighing 140lb, or 63.5kg.

The team from the Big Cypress National Preserve posted news of their record-setting catch in a Facebook post that also noted the giant reptile was carrying 73 eggs.

Environmentalists have been struggling to find ways to eradicate Burmese pythons, a non-native species, from the 1.5m-acre wilderness since the 1980s, when some were released into the wild as overgrown pets. Others escaped from a breeding facility wrecked by Hurricane Andrew in 1992.

Populations of raccoons, opossums and bobcats have fallen by between 88% and 99% as the python population has exploded, studies have shown, while several species of rabbits and foxes have all but disappeared. Experts believes tens of thousands of the snakes are currently slithering through Everglades waterways.

“All of the python work at Big Cypress is focused on controlling this invasive species, which poses significant threats to native wildlife,” the researchers wrote in the post.

They also said the record-breaking python was snared after its position was given away by a boyfriend – a so-called Judas snake.

“Using male pythons with radio transmitters allows the team to track the male to locate breeding females,” they said. “The team not only removes the invasive snakes, but collects data for research, develop new removal tools and learn how the pythons are using the preserve.”

They said their teams had been able to remove several other breeding females from the same area in recent months in partnership with the US Geological Survey.

The record-breaking python outweighs a female captured in Big Cypress in December 2017 by snake hunter Jason Leon, which measured 17ft 1in and weighed 132lb, according to the Miami Herald.

Agencies responsible for managing the Everglades stage regular public python hunts and last year recorded their 1,000th kill, by a hunter who bagged more than 100.

Other efforts to remove pythons have proved less successful. Everglades National Park scientists trained a beagle puppy named Python Pete to sniff out the snakes, but had to abandon the venture when Pete wilted in the heat of the Florida summer.

In 2017, two renowned snake catchers from India’s mountain-dwelling Irula tribe bagged only 33 pythons after chanting across the Everglades for two months.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
To Legacy: citizens are willing to go along with business when their own economic lives are rough or threatened --- but once they think that they are doing OK with the Status Quo, they prefer no one messing around with their lives. If this is "just another money-maker" for someone who doesn't even live there, then NIMBY arises and citizens get organized to stop the "change" if it (right or wrong) is perceived as having risk or restriction.

Businesses happily attempt to maximize their own thrival --- that is all they are programmed to do, being overly-powerful but simplistic organisms. Individuals try to thrive too. The country was set up to, theoretically, give citizens the say. In this legal age of businesses defined as having court standing, we don't --- except if we can make the "Life" argument from Life >> Liberty >> Pursuit of Happiness (now defined as wealth.) Business must argue Wealth, but citizens can attempt to counter with "Life/ Health Risks." NIMBY always comes down to that. ... and the rest of the country, who are not threatened because they don't live there, mock the NIMBY-ites instead of supporting their fellow citizens fighting like Dwarves versus Giants.

Trump signs orders targeting states' power to slow energy projects

190410-donald-trump-executive-order-ew-557p_0e968a921da0984104ae784fc25bc93e.fit-2000w.jpg


CROSBY, Texas/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump signed two executive orders in the heart of the Texas energy hub on Wednesday targeting the power of states to delay natural gas, coal and oil projects as he looks to build support ahead of next year’s election.

Trump’s orders direct his Environmental Protection Agency to change a part of the U.S. clean water law that has allowed states to delay projects on environmental grounds. New York has delayed pipelines that would bring natural gas to New England, for example, and Washington state has stopped coal export terminals.

“My action today will cut through destructive permitting delays and denials ... what takes you 20 years to get a permit, those days are gone,” said Trump, surrounded by workers in hard hats and yellow vests.

He signed the orders at a training center for petroleum industry workers near Houston, an event sandwiched between fundraising events for the 2020 presidential campaign...

Above and beyond any discussion about his actions running roughshod over the will of the vast majority of U.S. citizens, the legislative intent of the Clean Water Act, environmental legal protections, and the illegal exercise of Presidential authority, this is political power at its worst to benefit his very wealthy friends and supporters at the expense of all citizens.

Trump signs orders making it harder to block pipelines

CROSBY, Texas (AP) — President Donald Trump’s support for shifting more power to states on Wednesday faded next to his affinity for oil and gas production, as he aimed to make it harder for states to block pipelines and other energy projects due to environmental concerns.

At the urging of business groups, Trump signed two executive orders designed to speed up oil and gas pipeline projects. The action came after officials in Washington state and New York used the permitting process to stop new energy projects in recent years, prompting complaints from Republican members of Congress and the fossil fuel industry.

“Too often badly needed energy infrastructure is being held back by special interest groups, entrenched bureaucracies and radical activists,” Trump complained before signing the orders.

The Trump administration insisted it was not trying to take power away from the states but, rather, trying to make sure that state actions follow the intent of the Clean Water Act. Under a section of the law, companies must get certification from the state before moving ahead with an energy project.

Washington state blocked the building of a coal terminal in 2017, saying there were too many major harmful effects including air pollution, rail safety and vehicle traffic...

Virginia, Pennsylvania, and other states in addition to those mentioned above have halted construction and revoked permits due to multiple violations of environmental laws.

Pennsylvania halted construction of the natural gas pipeline across the southern part of the state, citing a series of spills and leaks of drilling fluid and other “egregious and willful violations” of state law that have plagued the $2.5 billion project.

A federal judge's ruling in October 2018 found that over the past two years, federal and state agencies tasked with enforcing the nation’s environmental laws have moved repeatedly to clear roadblocks and expedite the pipeline, even changing the rules at times to ease the project’s approvals. The states' right to enforce their citizens' rights to clean water. The three judge panel said, in that case, that the Army Corps of Engineers “lacked authority to substitute” one construction method for a one that the environmental permitting was issued for pipeline work that would dam four rivers and blast areas beneath the substrates of the rivers. The permit was for 72 hours and the alternative citizen groups said the agencies could use a more conventional method to bore under the rivers, perhaps reducing the effects.

From the Reuters article above:
One order directs the transportation secretary to propose allowing liquefied natural gas, a liquid form of the fuel, to be shipped in approved rail cars.

The orders also give the president the power to issue permits for projects that span international borders, taking that power from the secretary of state. Trump issued a presidential permit last month for the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline to bring crude from Canada.

Canadian pipeline operator Enbridge Inc supports the orders’ “focus on enhancing the predictability of the permitting process and the critical importance of investing in energy infrastructure in the U.S. and Canada,” company spokesman Michael Barnes said. Enbridge had an oil pipeline project from Canada to the United States halted by opposition in Michigan.

The orders could also speed projects in Texas. Energy investors vying for permits to build oil export terminals along the Gulf Coast say they have worked closely with Trump officials in a bid to speed regulatory reviews of facilities capable of loading supertankers.

U.S. and state agencies overseeing permit applications have taken too long to approve projects, the investors said, adding they were worried their projects would miss the most profitable years of the U.S. crude export boom.

Four energy groups led by Trafigura AG, Carlyle Group, Enterprise Products Partners LP and Enbridge have applied to build terminals in Texas.

NIMBY, of course, is based on the assumption that citizens whether landowners or in a project's watersheds or in states affected have any say, opportunity to voice their opinions or input at the state, local or federal levels.
 
Last edited:

MJ12666

New member
Messages
794
Reaction score
60
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/201...-change-crisis-is-a-completely-made-up-issue/

Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore described the left’s “climate change” narrative as a “hoax” and “completely made-up issue”

“The Al Gores are basically snake oil salesmen, charlatans. They are dealing in this complete hoax of a scare [about] the climate, and as you say, scaring young people into thinking that they’re going to die.”

“The environmental movement as it was in the Sixties and Seventies is not really necessary anymore in North America or in Europe,” declared Moore. “It’s done its job, and yet it’s perpetuating itself based on this so-called climate change crisis or catastrophe that actually doesn’t exist.”

The climate change narrative is “not just fake news; it’s fake science,” Moore said. “That is a fact, and I will put my reputation — 45 years as a scientist studying these subjects — on the line. I don’t get paid by the government to make up stories so politicians can scare the electorate into voting for them on the climate issue.”

In an interview two weeks ago on Breitbart News Tonight, Moore explained the corrupt business model — built on government funding — upon which the “climate change” narrative and industry exists.



https://www.upi.com/Science_News/20...nking-glacier-is-growing-again/6241553604714/
For the last two decades, Greenland's Jakobshavn Glacier has been rapidly melting. It is the island's fastest-flowing and fastest-thinning glacier. But according to new data collected by NASA scientists, the glacier is growing again.

According to new research by scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the glacier's turnaround is explained by the arrival of cold coastal water. The research was published in the journal Nature Geoscience this week.

The cold currents first arrived in 2016, and temperatures near the face of the glacier are now the coldest they've been in 40 years.

"At first we didn't believe it," JPL glaciologist Ala Khazendar said in a news release. "We had pretty much assumed that Jakobshavn would just keep going on as it had over the last 20 years."
 
Last edited:

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,972
Reaction score
6,462
Oh Boy........

People can and should take whatever thoughtful positions they arrive at concerning Global Climate Change, but they probably should realize that Patrick Moore is essentially a liar. If one wants to build a personal anti-GCC stance/argument OK, but there are better ways than believing anything this clown says.

Greenpeace has been continuously irritated by Moore who lies about his relationship with them (he is not a founder of Greenpeace --- he sailed on one of their first ships as a volunteer and did admin work in the Canadian office for a while before quitting and going to work as a nuclear lobbyist, openly opposing Greenpeace for the last 30 years --- this is directly from Greenpeace's website statement on him.)

Moore has gone on to be a spokesman for lumbering, mining, and chemical industries in support of polluting practices and poor stewardship practices all opposed by Greenpeace. These industries typically would hire Moore to oppose Greenpeace directly when they came under Greenpeace criticism, on the theory that his former employment within the organization gave him added clout and insight to front their campaigns.

Moore has been appointed by the Nuclear Energy Institute as a co-chair of a public-relations project for changing public resistance to dependence upon nuclear as the solution to the energy crisis.

Again, one should create one's own view of these complex issues, (and including the desirability or not of going strongly towards nuclear --- which ironically would lessen dependence upon fossil fuel burning and aid to a degree the GCC problem, IF its other issues could be safely addressed. But the above quotes are from Moore and are almost entirely lies and misrepresentations, so people should take their inspirations elsewhere to someone who has at least a shred of credibility) (this guy isn't even a relevant scientist on any of these technical points.)
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321

A Greenland glacier is growing. That doesn't mean melting is over.
A pulse of cooler water at its edge let part of the glacier gain some mass. But overall, the melting across Greenland continues apace.

(National Geographic)

IT’S MELTING AND it’s not coming back. That’s something we often hear about our shifting climate and the ice that, in a sense, holds it together. Throughout the Arctic, glaciers are shrinking, right?

Maybe not quite the way we think.

NASA's Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) project has revealed Greenland’s Jakobshavn Glacier, the island’s biggest, is actually growing, at least at its edge. In research published Monday in Nature Geoscience, researchers report that since 2016, Jakobshavn’s ice has thickened slightly, thanks to relatively cool ocean waters at its base—which have caused the glacier to slow down its melt. This reverses the glacier’s 20-year trend of thinning and retreating. But because of what else is happening on the ice sheet, and the overall climate outlook, that’s not necessarily a good thing for global sea level.

That's because, despite the fact that this particular glacier is growing, the whole Greenland ice sheet is still losing lots and lots of ice. Jakobshavn drains only about seven percent of the entire ice sheet, so even if it were growing robustly, mass loss from the rest of the ice sheet would outweigh its slight expansion....

Videos of how glaciers in Alaska, Iceland and Mt Everest have receded over time.
http://extremeicesurvey.org/

and in Glacier National Park over almost 100 years
https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock...ce_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
https://www.breitbart.com/radio/201...-change-crisis-is-a-completely-made-up-issue/

Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore described the left’s “climate change” narrative as a “hoax” and “completely made-up issue”

“The Al Gores are basically snake oil salesmen, charlatans. They are dealing in this complete hoax of a scare [about] the climate, and as you say, scaring young people into thinking that they’re going to die.”

“The environmental movement as it was in the Sixties and Seventies is not really necessary anymore in North America or in Europe,” declared Moore. “It’s done its job, and yet it’s perpetuating itself based on this so-called climate change crisis or catastrophe that actually doesn’t exist.”

The climate change narrative is “not just fake news; it’s fake science,” Moore said. “That is a fact, and I will put my reputation — 45 years as a scientist studying these subjects — on the line. I don’t get paid by the government to make up stories so politicians can scare the electorate into voting for them on the climate issue.”

In an interview two weeks ago on Breitbart News Tonight, Moore explained the corrupt business model — built on government funding — upon which the “climate change” narrative and industry exists.

March records for warm weather across Alaska were ‘obliterated’ this year


Alaska smashed heat records in March and will likely eclipse a 54-year mark to post the state’s hottest March ever recorded, climatologists say.

Many Alaskans have reveled in the warm wave, but others are wary, saying the unprecedented heat has put lives at risk on melting rivers and created challenges for hunters trying to get food.

March 2019 temps throughout the world:
55949830_1303587216460004_9030408867166552064_n.png


One of Alaska’s warmest springs on record is causing a dangerous thaw

UTQIAGVIK - Bryan Thomas doesn’t want any more “wishy-washy conversations about climate change.”

For four years, he has served as station chief of the Barrow Atmospheric Baseline Observatory, America's northernmost scientific outpost in its fastest-warming state. Each morning, after digging through snow to his office's front door, Thomas checks the preliminary number on the observatory's carbon dioxide monitor. On a recent Thursday it was almost 420 parts per million - nearly twice as high as the global preindustrial average.

It's just one number, he said. But there's no question in his mind about what it means.

Alaska is in the midst of one of the warmest springs the state has ever experienced - a transformation that has disrupted livelihoods and cost lives. The average temperature for March recorded at the NOAA observatory in Utquiagvik was 18.6 degrees Fahrenheit above normal. Fairbanks notched its first consecutive March days when the temperature never dropped below freezing. Ice roads built on frozen waterways - a vital means of transportation in the state - have become weak and unreliable. At least five people have died this spring after falling through ice that melted sooner than expected.
Climate change could melt decades worth of human poop at Denali National Park in Alaska

There’s good news and bad news at Denali, North America’s tallest mountain.

The bad news is that the 66 tons of frozen feces left by climbers on the Alaska summit is expected to start melting out of the glacier sometime in the coming decades and potentially as soon as this summer, a process that’s speeding up in part due to global warming.

The good news is that this year, for the first time, the guide companies that lead many of the 1,200 climbers who attempt the summit each year have voluntarily decided to start packing out their human waste. This comes just a year after the National Park Service instituted a policy that all such waste below 14,000 feet must be carried off the mountain.


The first two articles were from Anchorage Daily News, and the third is from USA Today.
 
Last edited:

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,972
Reaction score
6,462
well it's nice that someone is paying attention, but we all know that "science" today is a dirty word so it will make no difference.

The "problem" here is like nearly all of the so-called environmental problems --- they are all "slow bullets." They just don't jump right on people and things and kill them.

Slow bullets are easy to ignore, or if one would rather, call fake science or fake news. Nothing will happen. The power of the money behind the offending products and systems dwarfs anything that scientific studies can muster. As I've said elsewhere in this and other fora, I've given up on us stopping any of these damaging behaviors. We are the first civilization ever on this planet which not only has the cultural mantra of "deny yourself nothing" but the economic and technical power to translate that attitude into multiple catastrophes. The microscopic plastic pollution tonnages represent just another demon horse already run from the barn.

So, let's sit back and deny that these substances are not just deteriorating into micro-sized particles, but in time into nano-sized ones, whereupon they can gain entrance into the actual cell-structure itself. What will they all do once they accumulate there? Who knows, but it should be a He!l of a Good Time rolling those dice and waiting to see.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Pebble Mine

Pebble Mine

I dislike reposting my prior posts, but for reference...

Something always came up before I could post on this subject.
pebble.jpg

Pebble mine gets no better with time Anchorage Daily News, Feb 2017

The Economic Importance of the Bristol Bay Salmon Industry 2013
prepared for the Bristol Bay Regional Seafood Development Association
image_view_fullscreen


An Assessment of Potential Mining Impacts on Salmon Ecosystems of Bristol Bay, Alaska Jan 2014, EPA

Then there was this surprising decision by Pruitt's EPA saving jobs and the environment:
In reversal, EPA deals setback to controversial gold mining proposal in Alaska Jan 2018

This abomination has once again risen from the dead despite an unprecedented coalition of Alaskans: tribes, village corporations, businesses, commercial fishermen, recreational fisherman, lodge-owners, hunters, conservationists and Native American subsistence fishing. The vast majority of Alaskans are vehemently and vocally against it. It's the one environmental issue former Senator Ted ("Drill Baby Drill") Stevens opposed and it united both Democrats and Republicans nationally and in a state generally in favor of mining. In 2014, a majority of Alaskans in every voting district in the state — regardless of partisan preference — voted for additional protections for Bristol Bay. Why? This is a huge mine in pristine wilderness at the edge of Bristol Bay and its watershed. Mostly, this will be an open pit mine. The open pit might reach 2 miles (3.2 km) wide and several thousand feet deep. Most of the rock removed from the pit would become waste, amounting to as much as 10 billion tons.[50] That material, along with allowed discharge chemicals, would be stored permanently in two artificial lakes behind embankment dams. The largest would be 740 feet (230 m) tall and 4.3 miles (6.9 km) long and will need to be preserved in perpetuity. The Bristol Bay watershed, to the region’s wild-salmon based economy—generating $1.5 billion a year in revenue and 14,000 jobs. Last summer alone, the Bristol Bay fishery generated a record 62 million wild salmon. Both Republican Senators voiced their opposition to the mine proposal by a Canadian company. Senators from the Northwest whose fishing industry and their jobs fish Bristol Bay. The Pebble Mine group has already spent $11 million to lobby Congress. To put that into perspective, the entire pharmaceutical industry contributed $28 million to lobby Congress in all of 2018. Pebble Partnership CEO and long-time Washington, D.C. lawyer Tom Collier this week attacked opponents of the massive proposed mining project for their continuing opposition, asserting that “they choose Alaska primarily because they don’t have to suffer the backlash from the economic impact of the project being killed because no one gives a rat’s ass what happens in Alaska.” The permitting process by the Army Corps of Engineers is almost done as required by the Clean Water Act. Trump's EPA is currently composed of people who have represented mining industries. This is truly mind-numbing. What motivates the Trump Administration besides the billions to made? The disgraced former EPA director, Scott Pruitt, who was investigated by the FBI for conflicts of interest, gave an indication for his motivation in his resignation letter to Trump.
"It is extremely difficult for me to cease serving you in this role first because I count it a blessing to be serving you in any capacity, but also, because of the transformative work that is occurring." "My desire in service to you has always been to bless you as you make important decisions for the American people. I believe you are serving as President today because of God's providence. I believe that same providence brought me into your service. I pray as I have served you that I have blessed you and enabled you to effectively lead the American people."
If ever there was something for which Clean Water Act was established, it is to prevent this. As Veritate said in a post in this Environment thread,
We are in dangerous times. Trump views everything through a near-sighted capitalist lens. He's going to help us continue stripping and polluting this planet at an increased rate. Who knows what the world will look in the years to come.

Truth.
 
Last edited:

Irishize

Well-known member
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
461
I listened to Jordan Peterson’s interview of Bjorn Lomborg who leads the Copenhagen Consensus Center. He is NOT a science denier. He does NOT deny climate change. He’s an economist who simply notes that the UN Millennial Goals list 169 which is far too many & unfortunately for the Eco-Socialists; the threat of climate change does not outweigh the threats of Tuberculosis and heart disease around the world. The UN wants to spread a portion of money towards each & every one of the 169 goals. How the hell will that accomplish anything? It’s like spitting into the Grand Canyon. Focus on the truly immediate catastrophic threats the world faces first. In the meantime, he calls for more research on cheaper & sustainable energy sources to replace coal & oil. He correctly notes that solar panels & wind farms are far too expensive for the benefits they supply. He touches on that in the link below.

https://www.hoover.org/research/cost-effective-approaches-save-environment-bjorn-lomborg-0
 
Top