Crazy Balki
Site Assigned Optimist
- Messages
- 7,868
- Reaction score
- 4,477
So, something occurred to me. I always seem to run across the always prevalent argument that ND has trouble recruiting because the weather in South Bend is unfavorable. This makes things difficult to constantly get top-level recruits.
Let's translate this to basketball shall we? Then how is it that Kentucky, Syracuse, UConn or Kansas get the highest level recruits. True, they are elite basketball schools, but so is ND in regards to football, and they sport weather that is unfavorable. Hartford has winters that are on par with South Bend, as does Syracuse, NY. Lexington, KY isn't exactly a hot spot location, so while the basketball is good, the area isn't really all that much. Kansas is smack dab in the middle of Tornado Alley and the state is a baron wasteland.
Why is it that basketball recruiting relies less on location than football? Is it because the recruits are there longer in football? Is it because they play outside? It seems that if you're lucky you'll be out for the NBA draft in 2 years, compared to 3 in football. That's one whole year difference. Football is a "get used to it" type of deal. You may not like playing in that kind of weather, but if you plan on going to the NFL you damn well better get used to it, because odds are you'll be playing in it a majority of the time.
Not a big discussion, but it always intrigued me how ND's location seemed to always be a huge disadvantage, especially with a school just across the state line with equally as bad weather recruiting extremely well. Just seems like an often discussed issue.
Let's translate this to basketball shall we? Then how is it that Kentucky, Syracuse, UConn or Kansas get the highest level recruits. True, they are elite basketball schools, but so is ND in regards to football, and they sport weather that is unfavorable. Hartford has winters that are on par with South Bend, as does Syracuse, NY. Lexington, KY isn't exactly a hot spot location, so while the basketball is good, the area isn't really all that much. Kansas is smack dab in the middle of Tornado Alley and the state is a baron wasteland.
Why is it that basketball recruiting relies less on location than football? Is it because the recruits are there longer in football? Is it because they play outside? It seems that if you're lucky you'll be out for the NBA draft in 2 years, compared to 3 in football. That's one whole year difference. Football is a "get used to it" type of deal. You may not like playing in that kind of weather, but if you plan on going to the NFL you damn well better get used to it, because odds are you'll be playing in it a majority of the time.
Not a big discussion, but it always intrigued me how ND's location seemed to always be a huge disadvantage, especially with a school just across the state line with equally as bad weather recruiting extremely well. Just seems like an often discussed issue.