ND2015
New member
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
Next year I am going to be a freshman at Notre Dame and I have been looking for a Notre Dame forum and this is the best one I have run into. With my first post I would like to see everyones opinion on Nike vs. Addidas. Personally, I feel that Notre Dame being sponsored by Addidas really hurts the football team in recruiting even though I think the equipment they provide is much better than Nike. Around high schools you will never see kids wearing Addidas or UA. Literally everywhere you go all high school athletes are decked out in Nike from head to toe. Nike is much more popular because it is much more "fresh" than any other of the apparel companies and it would be a great benefit to the football team if Nike provides our equipment because it is much more attractive to kids in high school these days. Now I know Addidas pays us something like $6M a year and we have a contract running through 2014 or 2015 but I'm sure Nike would offer something very close due to the fact that we are such a national program and sell merchandise around the country.
2009. Alabama (Nike) vs. Texas (Nike)
2008. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. Florida (Nike)
2007. Ohio State (Nike) vs. LSU (Nike)
2006. Ohio State (Nike) vs. Florida (Nike)
2005. USC (Nike) vs. Texas (Nike)
2004. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. USC (Nike)
2003. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. LSU (Nike)
2002. Miami (Nike) vs. Ohio State (Nike)
2001. Miami (Nike) vs. Nebraska (Addidas)
2000. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. Florida State (Nike)
Now I know that the Nike isn't the sole reason that these schools are successful but it certainly helps when attracting recruits. Over the last decade every national championship winner has been sponsored by Nike with only one appearance by Addidas. This year UA will make its first appearance in the NCG. I would love to hear your thoughts.
2009. Alabama (Nike) vs. Texas (Nike)
2008. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. Florida (Nike)
2007. Ohio State (Nike) vs. LSU (Nike)
2006. Ohio State (Nike) vs. Florida (Nike)
2005. USC (Nike) vs. Texas (Nike)
2004. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. USC (Nike)
2003. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. LSU (Nike)
2002. Miami (Nike) vs. Ohio State (Nike)
2001. Miami (Nike) vs. Nebraska (Addidas)
2000. Oklahoma (Nike) vs. Florida State (Nike)
Now I know that the Nike isn't the sole reason that these schools are successful but it certainly helps when attracting recruits. Over the last decade every national championship winner has been sponsored by Nike with only one appearance by Addidas. This year UA will make its first appearance in the NCG. I would love to hear your thoughts.