LifelongFan
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 1,914
Mickens has missed big once and it cost us the playoffs with Hobbs.
Is there any statement from the committee this year that teams won’t be punished for losing Conference championships? If there is, it’s cope. But I don’t think that’s actually a rule and if it’s not it makes sense.I think this is cope but anything is possible.
Right, it seems like the transparent play is that they are dragging this out to swap Miami in at the last second and get patted on the back for doing so.I think people are looking for logic in something that has no logic. All discussion has been about ND versus Miami so they milked it until the last dramatic week when they will flip it.
I think this is cope but anything is possible
It really doesn't make any sense to jump them now. You've essentially set up a situation where, as it is, you have TWO rematches set up. Why would you want to do that? Just wait a week, if Bama wins, they jump ND. If they lose, they stay where they're at.Now that I’ve calmed down a bit. Bama is in and probably jumping with a win. Bumping Bama ahead of ND allows them potentially to drop Bama one spot and keep the buffer
YepI don't think we get in, I think as soon as they started getting political pressure and direct lobbying they folded. The idea that Bama jumped ND because an "impressive win over Auburn" convinced people to move Bama up is the biggest lie I have ever heard. This shit is worse than FIFA.
They are doing all of this to get ND next to Miami so that they can dramatically put Miami in the playoffs this weekend if BYU loses. I am laying heavy bets on Miami to get in while sprinkling BYU as an unlikely hedge... either I cry on a pile of money or ND gets in and I'm happy with a little less money.
Burn the whole system down, go to 16 no byes / no AQs / no committee. 12 does NOT work if you are going to circle jerk the SEC like this and also give spots away to bad G5 teams.
I think they actually said after last year with SMU that they *would* consider dropping teams for bad CCG performances.Is there any statement from the committee this year that teams won’t be punished for losing Conference championships? If there is, it’s cope. But I don’t think that’s actually a rule and if it’s not it makes sense.
If a loss in the SEC championship game doesn't hurt Bama, why does a loss in the Big 12 title game presumably hurt BYU? The double standard is ridiculous
In that case, why keep Miami at 12 behind BYU. Even if that was the play, this is a downright idiotic way to go about it.Right, it seems like the transparent play is that they are dragging this out to swap Miami in at the last second and get patted on the back for doing so.
There is no reason to up jump Bama for struggling with Auburn. That's the tell that the swap wasn't done on merit. It was to put ND close enough to Miami. That's at least my gut read on the situation.
But in order to move Miami adjacent to ND, it would have toit doesn’t have to hurt them to leave them out. At 11 you need an auto bid without a top 10 ACC team in the title game.
The whole defense failed against A&M. But yeah, that was bad.Mickens has missed big once and it cost us the playoffs with Hobbs.
Because if they moved up Miami this week then they'd already have to swap them and ND.In that case, why keep Miami at 12 behind BYU. Even if that was the play, this is a downright idiotic way to go about it.
Because again, by the same logic that Bama can't drop for losing, neither can BYU.
That's what doesn't make sense. You flip ND and Alabama now, you've locked in rematches at the 8-9 and 7-10 spot.Are they doing it perhaps to be able to position seeding for the last week so they don't have rematches. Like between AM and ND?
Chaos scenario that would result in serious repercussions:In a morbid way, I hope BYU wins and Miami gets one spot ahead of ND, only to still be out. At that point, they will realize they fought the wrong battle the whole time.
Everything else aside we are probably undefeated if Devonta Smith never gets hurt pre-season.Mickens has missed big once and it cost us the playoffs with Hobbs.
But now they can't move Miami up at all, because BYU can't move down for losing in the CCG.Because if they moved up Miami this week then they'd already have to swap them and ND.
But what’s the downside of doing it now? Maintain the controversy another week for views? ESPN certainly isn’t above that I supposeBecause if they moved up Miami this week then they'd already have to swap them and ND.
But now they can't move Miami up at all, because BYU can't move down for losing in the CCG.
I don't think it started as a week's long conspiracy but I think they started listening to the lobbying over the past two weeks. There is no *logical* case to move Bama up for squeaking by Auburn.Anyone who thinks this is a weeks long conspiracy to drop ND at the last possible second thinks way too highly of both the committee’s ability to plan and of ND as the center of the universe
But Bama can drop a spot now since they are ahead of ND.In that case, why keep Miami at 12 behind BYU. Even if that was the play, this is a downright idiotic way to go about it.
Because again, by the same logic that Bama can't drop for losing, neither can BYU.
ND should punt Stanford as our rivalry game and get a decent one.Auburn is not good but they are likely putting weight on the Iron Bowl rivalry won at Auburn.
I don't think it started as a week's long conspiracy but I think they started listening to the lobbying over the past two weeks. There is no *logical* case to move Bama up for squeaking by Auburn.
Logical reasons...avoid a rematch, ability to drop Bama after they lose and keep them in the playoffs, and because they dropped Bama with a loss...now they can drop BYU too.I don't think it started as a week's long conspiracy but I think they started listening to the lobbying over the past two weeks. There is no *logical* case to move Bama up for squeaking by Auburn.