Even after our amazing win, we managed to be situated with a #11 ranking from the Associated Press. I'm only content with this ranking because we didn't play well enough until the end to jump a few spots, and we didn't play bad enough to drop 4 or 5 spots. So all in all, #11 isn't that bad. Why Michigan is 2, USC 3, and Tennessee 8 bewilders me. scUM struggled as did Tennessee, and USC continues to be the most overrated Top 5 team of all time.
You contradicted yourself. You imply that Nd shouldn't be punished after a close call, yet you think USC, us and Tennessee should drop, as if you actually knew who would be higher. I guess you're a West Virginia fan. Lou Holtz will love you writing off USC, as is hoping and saying USC is bad actually makes them vulnerable at home (where they haven't lost in ages) to Nd. Guess that national title dream is still alive.
You're just mad because the writers and coaches have finally seen through this facade that is 2006 Nd football. There is no bias here, the only bias is you feeling angry because the Nd bias has finally worn off.
And your bias against us is obvious. We had one bad game and we still ended up winning by 14. We never trailed Iowa, our defense dominated and there wasn't really a time when anyone felt we would lose the game. Obviously, our offense played horribly, but since you probably didn't bother to watch the game, I assume you
hoped that we played poorly.
Right now, I almost want OSU or Michigan to meet Nd in the BCS national title game. That way, when either team blows you out by at least 3 touchdowns, the media will finally stop this Nd fixation, and start treating teams on a level playing field and have guys like you shut your mouth.
