NankerPhelge
WANKER
- Messages
- 805
- Reaction score
- 126
Just outta curiosity, how big was Rudy? He sure looks little in that movie.
Just outta curiosity, how big was Rudy? He sure looks little in that movie.
@cbfowler
Fractures at 84 hairline or otherwise can end up fatal. Think not - ask your grandparents or parents (or dshans). I'm sure PSU has a team of physicians on top of this. Nonetheless, disconcerting.
Just outta curiosity, how big was Rudy? He sure looks little in that movie.
That has nothing to do with brain injuries. Brain injuries, as relates to football, are all about inertia, and repetition.
Two big guys, having more mass, create more inertia at the point of impact than two small guys do. It stands to reason that a big guy and small guy meeting at the point of impact would fall somewhere in between.
...
Taking this to its logical conclusion, let's have Manti launch into a 2nd grader who weighs maybe 50 lbs. Manti has 200 lbs on him. The hit could easily result in a grade 3 concussion, internal bleeding, or even death.
If it truly "stands to reason" that lighter players create less inertia, thereby suffering less force at the point of impact, then the 2nd grader should be the least scathed of all these guy; but we all intuitively know that wouldn't be the case.
...
INVALID
A logical conclusion? Your first 3 examples were pitting 18 to 20 year old young men against each other. Your fourth example had the 20 run into a child with a still developing bone structure.
![]()
I was merely trying to describe the importance of mass and strength in handling forceful impacts. On that basis alone, the age of my examples is irrelevant.
Make it an athletic 20-year-old midget weighing roughly 50 lbs. Shouldn't change anything.
Your introduction of a juvenile (check it out it means not fully developed) skeletal system introduced a new variable not present in the 3 other examples and is patently invalid even to the most casual observer. (Lawyers excluded)