It IS a good read, but I'm still not happy with the assumption/opinion that [again before the relevant facts] Kelly HAS to suspend Floyd for at least one game or it's "not right". That opinion is hypocrisy considering the entire tenor of the previous philosophy of the article. The "logical" follow-on "assumption" should be: Kelly will decide WITHOUT PRESSURE from any of the rest of people's opinions whether Mike Floyd NEEDS any suspension from games for Mike's OWN good. If the article had followed its own commendable premises and facts, that would have been the appropriate conclusion. People still cannot shake their own fears about what other people are going to think, and just get out of the way of decisions to be made by others who have factors of ten better knowledge upon which to help someone get his life back together.