The fact is, with the upcoming super conferences... i.e. Pac 16, Big 16, ND can't do anything about it. In order to get into a title game, they will have to join a conference.
Maybe...but I guess I just don't understand how this changes wins and losses and strength of schedule, and the BCS system.
Only way this comes in on us is if folks who've played against ND are suddenly going to be compelled to not?
Even in the "super conference" approach...folks gotta have non-conference games...its absurd to think it would be good for their recruiting if they inbred like that...Notre Dame is not the only powerhouse who suffers if non-conference games aren't supported...SC, TEXAS, Florida, and Bama would suffer...and the type A personalities of coaches just don't jive with boundaries like that...Saban is going to want to play who he wants to play if he thinks it furthers his recruiting somewhere...same with Urbie. Don't know of a coach who likes to hide (well ok JOEPA). As well, ND revenues for TV are going to be high...how do ya ignore that?
In my time I've seen some monumental screw ups...so maybe these coaches just go along, maybe everyone is turned into regional league members...and maybe people in power to make decisions ignore the almighty dollar, and this doesn't go our way...but it'd be beyond dumb.
As well, my view is, the BCS is about to be forceably restructured... how they hand out bowl bids with guarantees for conferences will be undone...its the thing that drives the anti-trust chatter...and that is serious stuff...BCS can't withstand a pissed off senator...and there are a handfull, and they are coming for them...
I can only conceive one "fair" way to do the bowls...My thought is, the average BCS score for an entire conference should drive whose champion gets the automatic bowl bids outside the NC game, with all conferences that are DI A on equal footing (NC game strictly on performance and SOS of individual teams...So ND can play NC games). I like it because 1) it forces teams to seek challenge vs pad their schedules by adding patsy teams to their conferences, 2) the BCS isn't overcome by a playoff, and 3) the Utah, Boise State, TCUs can't complain about fairness. (by the way, I think the mountain west champion would have gotten an automatic bowl this year...vs an at large shafting) 4) simplifies the BCS rules so people with IQs of less than 120 can make sense of it
anyway...back to what matters...In that scenario, monster conferences don't make sense because the exposure the lower performing teams give isn't worth it (e.g. vanderbuilt hurts the entire SEC come bowl time...so why add more teams)...AND...ND is back in the saddle...folks will be looking to up their SOS without the exposure of a loss to a competing conference...so conferences would be vying for ND to play their teams, while remaining an independant...as well, with the at large part of the BCS scenario unchanged...ND would almost always get an at large bid (assuming we actually perform) because we fill stadiums...
Bwahahaha...ND World Domination...well...We can wish can't we...
anyway...this was a monumental rant...whatever beating you guys throw out...I deserve