While I have heard these claims, no one ever elaborates on this point. How does he fail to represent the University? Is it his words, actions or attitude? When Coach Weis was first hired, he made some statements that most Notre Dame alum and fans cheered after he replaced the emotionless Ty Willingham. As things turned out, these were the same people who threw that back in his face after the 3-9 season. Also, many reacted in horror at his use of language on the "20-20" feature. What a surprise, a football coach swearing on the sidelines. Finally, Bob Kuechenberg criticized him, going as far to say that he treated alumni and former players poorly. What did he base that on (from what was reported afterward). He didn't get credit for his involvement in the successful recruitment of Aquinas stars Sam Young and Dan Wenger - comments by the coach which would have been NCAA violations.
As I see it, the ONLY thing that Coach Weis is guilty of is that despite, have no prior college coaching experience, he (and we) thought he could make a smooth transition from the pros to college. The past four years have proven to be on-the-job training. However, Coach Weis is not stupid. He listens and learns and EVERY season has profited from his mistakes and made corrections - in recruiting practices and procedures, interaction with his players (17-18 year-old amateurs ARE different from 25-26 year-old pros), bringing back former players, re-establishing positive connections with former "pipeline" schools, speaking to alumni groups, replacing coaches (even if loyalty resulted in perhaps waiting too long to do so). In other words, he HAS made progress; even if the results on the field haven't been as rapid as we might like.
I don't live in South Bend, nor am I a graduate. So, I'm at a disadvantage when it comes to first-hand information. I read the South Bend Tribune online and check out the Notre Dame fansites on a daily basis. What I can say, based upon what I read in these sources, is that Coach Weis, as a graduate, loves, understands the history and tradition and the academic standards that impact the recruitment of student-athletes at Notre Dame; is a tireless recruiter and wants more than anything else to make the 'Fighting Irish' a perennial BCS team.
Am I missing something? If so, please enlighten me. Who would you prefer? Realistically, who would you like to replace him and why do you think they would/could do a better job? Like most discussions, the results are that more questions arise than are answered or people what positive results, but don't offer anything concrete that will produce them!
Subway Alum - MA
ND Fan Since 1950