Because that's not how reality works? Every team and situation is the same??? Why didn't Brian Kelly win at LSU as much as he did at ND. Is it because the SEC is just better than Notre Dame and it isn't the same?
And just to reset the conversation, your initial post was "We're talking a perennial doormat going undefeated in year 2. It doesn't happen, but there is a first time for everything"
All I did was point out it absolutely happened not that long ago. And if it so easy at the G5, here is a list of the rest of the teams that have done it:
You're the one that said "From a coaching perspective, what's the difference?" You tell me. You brought up UCF. Surely UCF going 13-0 was deserving of a playoff spot and was just as good or better than the P4 teams that year, right? They made those cringey National Championship rings, the banner, shirts, everything...or maybe a coach turning around a G5 team doesn't mean quite as much and people treat it accordingly. There's also the point that we don't know if Frost cut corners for that UCF turn around, but given histories of other miraculous turn arounds there's a strong chance he was able to do something at UCF that wouldn't fly in a big program like Nebraska.
You conveniently left out the last part of that quote: "We're talking a perennial doormat going undefeated in year 2. It doesn't happen, but there is a first time for everything...
and there's usually some corners cut."
I don't believe for a second that Cignetti did everything on the up and up to win this championship. To win a championship Michigan needed to cheat to turn around their program that was stuck in neutral, and they have more resources and pull than Indiana has ever had. Credit IU, they found a way to win when it mattered, but I don't believe for a second Cignetti is the second coming of Leahy and did this without cutting some corner.