I'm not questioning if Rittenhouse was allowed to be carrying his weapon.
Im responding to the "wElL wHaT wAs hE eXpEcTiNg wHeN hE bRoUgHt a gUn wIth hIm??" argument.
Right and I pointed out that Rittenhouse is an amazing example because the Left analyzed it with about .1% accuracy in the days, weeks, and months after the event. Had one of the left-wing pedos or wife beaters there taken him down it would have raised a Darwin question for him and the parents. Instead, it was three low-life’s who earned their fate. I don’t think the in-depth play by play is going to matter in Minneapolis. This guy put himself in a bad situation and the officers are dealing with chaos and reacted to a perceived threat. I think the threshold to justify that threat will be easily met in this situation from what I am seeing, but we shall see. My confidence in the justice system diminishes more day by day, so you never know.
To be clear, I’m 100% confident the woman in the car got what she had coming and that agent is legally justified. That one is easy.
This second one is a lot murkier, and I still want more footage, but I disagree with the “there’s no debate“ notion.