Trump Presidency Round 2

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
6,932
Reaction score
2,254
I drive a classic Ram.

And that's a classic retort to a question you didn't even ask.

If you don't see an answer to my response before I even provided it, classic blinders.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,110
Reaction score
12,945
I drive a classic Ram.

And that's a classic retort to a question you didn't even ask.

If you don't see an answer to my response before I even provided it, classic blinders.
Colorado is the most charitable poster in these threads. If you think they’re too entrenched to bother answering their question you might as well just stop posting in here.
 

Fbolt

I've been around
Messages
6,932
Reaction score
2,254
123d6f4a-f7ca-471f-af0f-d6170cddbfe4_text.gif
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
Way to take the easy way out, I'm trying to have an honest discourse about this. If Obama or biden deployed the national guard without a request from local authorities everyone here, including myself, would be up in arms
 

Gladiator

Banned
Messages
1,359
Reaction score
1,018
This has to be one of the regulars here In the Politics thread.
My $100 bet would be- Toronto
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
People here are really ok with any president saying "I don't believe the crime stats of so and so city, I declare it an emergency, I don't care what the mayor/Governor says, I'm sending in troops." Is it going to take for the soldiers to demand a place to sleep before you realize what they doing? You're willing to surrender freedoms, and state sovereignty to the federal government this easily huh?
Well, it's already come out that the crime stats in DC were doctored, so there's that, but no one is surrendering freedom.
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
Well, it's already come out that the crime stats in DC were doctored, so there's that, but no one is surrendering freedom.
Yes because it's been proven to trust this administration when it comes to numbers. I'm truly surprised by the amount of people just blindly believing anything that they say
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
Yes because it's been proven to trust this administration when it comes to numbers. I'm truly surprised by the amount of people just blindly believing anything that they say
It wasn't the Trump administration that said that. It was a DC officer responsible for reporting statistics.

 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
Crime has been so bad for a while, you've become numb to it to the point it's normal?
What? ,I asked for him to expand upon his idea about when it would be ok for the president to send in the military without the local authorities request
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
Just wait until the next dem president. If there’s a mass shooting and the president declares it an national emergency and send federal troops to whatever city he feels like to go door to door looking for unregistered firearms. Betcha they’ll care then.
Nope, I'd be for it. Crime is one area we should all want to see educed considerably. Status quo isn't working. Instead of whining, why not offer a solution other than the same ones that have failed to make a dent.
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
It wasn't the Trump administration that said that. It was a DC officer responsible for reporting statistics.

I'm well aware of what's coming out. But the investigation still hasn't concluded, and it still doesn't change my point of people just believing this administration with whatever it says. Where's the same skepticism towards the federal government?
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
Nope, I'd be for it. Crime is one area we should all want to see educed considerably. Status quo isn't working. Instead of whining, why not offer a solution other than the same ones that have failed to make a dent.
How about offer a solution that doesn't involve federal over each and having troops deployed in our cities. I'm truly shocked by how many people are ok with this. People really would be ok with him becoming a dictator.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
What? ,I asked for him to expand upon his idea about when it would be ok for the president to send in the military without the local authorities request
Funny how you folks weren't calling for the NG to quell the riots in Portland, Minneapolis and LA. All the while, the police basically let the rioters run free.
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
Funny how you folks weren't calling for the NG to quell the riots in Portland, Minneapolis and LA. All the while, the police basically let the rioters run free.
Way to deflect. You have no idea what my stance on those situations were. I think the governor's should've called in the national guard in Portland and Minneapolis. Assuming you mean the most recent events in LA, I don't think they should've been called in then. We're seeing unprecedented over reach by the federal government currently and y'all will continue to bend over backwards to justify it and absolve Trump of any role it.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
I'm well aware of what's coming out. But the investigation still hasn't concluded, and it still doesn't change my point of people just believing this administration with whatever it says. Where's the same skepticism towards the federal government?
lol......The only person saying they are blindly accepting numbers from this administration is you, Gatt, etc.

You want to wait and see what the investigation shows. I'm betting if this is confirmed, you won't believe it because it was Trump's Justice department that validated the officers claims.

But let's use your logic. You want to wait and see what comes out of the investigation, but rather than waiting to see how the NG deployment in DC plays out, you're certain this is federalizing the police and the military is taking control of law enforcement. lol
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
lol......The only person saying they are blindly accepting numbers from this administration is you, Gatt, etc.

You want to wait and see what the investigation shows. I'm betting if this is confirmed, you won't believe it because it was Trump's Justice department that validated the officers claims.

But let's use your logic. You want to wait and see what comes out of the investigation, but rather than waiting to see how the NG deployment in DC plays out, you're certain this is federalizing the police and the military is taking control of law enforcement. lol
I'll be crystal clear I'm skeptical of whatever the government says regardless of whose in charge. And yes there's pretty much no situation where Trump should send in the military without a request from local authorities. Not sure what part of any of that is difficult to understand. It's not how our military is to be utilized. I've been very clear on my issues with Trump deploying troops on US soil.

I don't accept any numbers so I have no idea what myself or gattaca are accepting
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
Way to deflect. You have no idea what my stance on those situations were. I think the governor's should've called in the national guard in Portland and Minneapolis. Assuming you mean the most recent events in LA, I don't think they should've been called in then. We're seeing unprecedented over reach by the federal government currently and y'all will continue to bend over backwards to justify it and absolve Trump of any role it.
No deflection. You specifically mention if crime became extreme. I provided a couple examples. If violent riots aren't extreme, I don't know what is. Tampon Tim? Newsom step in? lol
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
No deflection. You specifically mention if crime became extreme. I provided a couple examples. If violent riots aren't extreme, I don't know what is. Tampon Tim? Newsom step in? lol
I was confused for a second lol. Still waiting for this coffee to kick in while I patch some servers. I understand what you're saying and where you are coming from. I just don't believe this should be what our federal government is doing and how the use the military. I have a hard time viewing this as small government, and honoring state and local rights
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,087
I was confused for a second lol. Still waiting for this coffee to kick in while I patch some servers. I understand what you're saying and where you are coming from. I just don't believe this should be what our federal government is doing and how the use the military. I have a hard time viewing this as small government, and honoring state and local rights
Better change from to decaf to regular.

I'm all for alternatives, but no one is offering any other solutions. At least Trump has stepped out of the box.
 

ColoradoIrish

Well-known member
Messages
902
Reaction score
1,293
Better change from to decaf to regular.

I'm all for alternatives, but no one is offering any other solutions. At least Trump has stepped out of the box.
😂 It's barely 615 here cut me some slack.

I'll agree for alternatives, in the mean time I'll continue being critical what's happening
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
You're a fucking moron.

1756301532422.png
People worked up because Trump uses the NG to temporarily supplement LE. It's a crisis because it's a military takeover, even though most of the NG aren't carrying weapons. DC goes 12 days without a murder. Hmmm
 
Top