Trump Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,075
LOL......My state just went 60% to Trump over former GOP sweetheart Haley and token Tim Scott already dropped out. My rep Nancy Mace has gone full MAGA piece of shit in her first term. No over reaction here. Just facts. You keep living in denial while the GOP turns into a christofascist nazi haven. Its been happening and will continue to happen. But Ive never been a GOP'r so I have no vested skin in the GOP's longtime survival.
60% that voted for Trump doesn’t mean they’re hardline Maga. It’s conceivable that they prefer some of Trumps policies over Haley.

Me? I used to be a Dem, then was Repub but have been independent for a while. I didn’t vote for Trump either time.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
60% that voted for Trump doesn’t mean they’re hardline Maga. It’s conceivable that they prefer some of Trumps policies over Haley.

Me? I used to be a Dem, then was Repub but have been independent for a while. I didn’t vote for Trump either time.
General you..... as in the general republican has some decisions to make. Yes.... voting for Trump is a vote for MAGA. It just is. Rationalize it however you want, but MAGA is not the traditional GOP. Its MAGA. If they wanted a typical republican they would have voted for Haley or Scott and rebuked Trump and MAGA. They didnt. The only precincts Haley won was my area which coincidentally is the most affluent, purple and well educated part of the state.

Further Mace barely won SC-01 in her first election.... barely by less than a few percent. Then they gerrymandered her district to be completely uncompetitive. She won easily the next time. Since then she has gone full MAGA. She was one of the 8 who ran McCarthy out.

The Trump's just ran McDaniel out of the RNC Chair and now Lara Trump is heading it up and they are going to take every last cent the GOP has to pay Trump, his legal bills, and his family. The GOP is about to be milked dry and if Trump wins, you can bet your bottom dollar he isnt leaving again. They will destroy all the honor system guardrails that exist and install loyalists to make sure there are no barriers in place this time. If the SCOTUS goes against the DC CoA ruling and rules he is eternally immune to criminal prosecution and there are no true outer bounds to the office of the President....god help us.
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,075
General you..... as in the general republican has some decisions to make. Yes.... voting for Trump is a vote for MAGA. It just is. Rationalize it however you want, but MAGA is not the traditional GOP. Its MAGA. If they wanted a typical republican they would have voted for Haley or Scott and rebuked Trump and MAGA. They didnt. The only precincts Haley won was my area which coincidentally is the most affluent, purple and well educated part of the state.

Further Mace barely won SC-01 in her first election.... barely by less than a few percent. Then they gerrymandered her district to be completely uncompetitive. She won easily the next time. Since then she has gone full MAGA. She was one of the 8 who ran McCarthy out.

The Trump's just ran McDaniel out of the RNC Chair and now Lara Trump is heading it up and they are going to take every last cent the GOP has to pay Trump, his legal bills, and his family. The GOP is about to be milked dry and if Trump wins, you can bet your bottom dollar he isnt leaving again. They will destroy all the honor system guardrails that exist and install loyalists to make sure there are no barriers in place this time. If the SCOTUS goes against the DC CoA ruling and rules he is eternally immune to criminal prosecution and there are no true outer bounds to the office of the President....god help us.
That's not going to happen. It would go against the entire foundation of our government. Everyone has to be held accountable to some degree.
 

bobbyok1

Dominates Wiffle Ball
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
1,287
60% that voted for Trump doesn’t mean they’re hardline Maga. It’s conceivable that they prefer some of Trumps policies over Haley.

Me? I used to be a Dem, then was Repub but have been independent for a while. I didn’t vote for Trump either time.
The vote for Trump in South Carolina was closer to 75% for Trump of Republican voters. 40% of Haley's vote was people who voted for Biden, mostly Dems. Of the other 25% of Republicans who did not vote for Trump, the word is most of those would vote for Trump over Biden. So, the Republican vote is overwhelmingly Trump in a General Election.



I agree that the GOP is not all MAGA. For sure. But, what I encourage you to think about is that MAGA = populism. MAGA is the populism wing of the GOP and that base is growing and will not slow down. This has less to do with Trump and more to do with cultural shifts towards populism. Look at Kennedy in the Democrat Party. He is the populism candidate for the Dems.

Populism is "we the people" pushing back on the "elite ruling class." The old wings of both parties are dying and populism is replacing both. MAGA in the GOP, and whatever the base is called that supports Kennedy in the DNC.
 
Last edited:

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
No faith in the will of our people. Got it.
Did you miss Jan 6th? He had senators, representatives, state AGs, state governors, state legislatures all ready to hand the election to him and only a few people stood in the way. Mike Pence was the last one. If you dont think Trump will get a VP who will absolutely do what he wants then you are fooling yourself. Every position of importance will have a loyalist next time around. They wont make those same mistakes again. Nothing has been done to shore up those guardrails and I guarantee you Trump and his loyalists wont let it get to certification again. They will spend their entire 4 years in office making sure he doesn't leave, installing loyalists into the gatekeeper positions etc... Who will remove him and how if he decides not to leave and the people have no one in the government to make him? What are the people going to do to a POTUS with immunity and the DOJ, military, and Federal LEO under his control.
 
Last edited:

Avila

Banned
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Saw Jimmy Carter was out building Habitat for Humanity houses at age 95 - amazing human being, great man. Horrible president. Struck me that he and Donald Trump are pretty close to polar opposites. Put those guys, in their primes, on a ballot for President today - each competing for a second term - and who do you vote for?

Does being a follower of Jesus matter? Have you even read "Peace not apartheid?"
Do you care about being a peacmaker, as the
Beatitudes mandate, or is that just for women and children?
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
Did you miss Jan 6th? He had senators, representatives, state AGs, state governors, state legislatures all ready to hand the election to him and only a few people stood in the way. Mike Pence was the last one. If you dont think Trump will get a VP who will absolutely do what he wants then you are fooling yourself. Every position of importance will have a loyalist next time around. They wont make those same mistakes again. Nothing has been done to shore up those guardrails and I guarantee you Trump and his loyalists wont let it get to certification again. They will spend their entire 4 years in office making sure he doesn't leave, installing loyalists into the gatekeeper positions etc... Who will remove him and how if he decides not to leave and the people have no one in the government to make him? What are the people going to do to a POTUS with immunity and the DOJ, military, and Federal LEO under his control.
This first part assumes all the worst, and leaves out other facts like the military not siding with Trump. They sided with the Constitution. When the Guard was called in to clear the Capitol they ordered the protestors out and they complied. For all the pearl clutching, democracy wasn't dying on Jan 6th, not even close. What were a bunch of unarmed citizens really going to do?
The second half is a bunch of fear mongering, right up there with the people that said Trump would be dropping nukes if he ever got into office. What we got instead was a relatively peaceful 4 years and even a temporarily more stable Middle East.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
This first part assumes all the worst, and leaves out other facts like the military not siding with Trump. They sided with the Constitution. When the Guard was called in to clear the Capitol they ordered the protestors out and they complied. For all the pearl clutching, democracy wasn't dying on Jan 6th, not even close. What were a bunch of unarmed citizens really going to do?
The second half is a bunch of fear mongering, right up there with the people that said Trump would be dropping nukes if he ever got into office. What we got instead was a relatively peaceful 4 years and even a temporarily more stable Middle East.
Nope. I'm listening to them. Not assuming the worst but definitely preparing for it because there is the chance that dumb motherfuckers vote for this scumbag again in numbers enough to put him back in power. They are already putting their plans out there. I'm paying attention.

Your opinion on Jan 6th is easily the dumbest take ever and we will never see it the same clearly. They LITERALLY ATTACKED THE FUCKING CAPTIAL BUILDING. They broke in. The Capital police was intentionally undermanned on the day. The National Guard was not ALLOWED to deploy. Trump and his loyalists stoked them on. I watched it. It was recorded. HE IS UNDER CRIMINAL INDICTMENT FOR THIS VERY THING. They absolutely succeeded in stopping the certification and it was far from clear what was going to happen. If Pence had not decided to return and complete the process it was ABSOLUTELY unknown territory because there were plenty of GOP Senators and Reps on board with overturning the electoral college and sending back to the states where they had FAKE ELECTORS ready to go in swing states. Also a criminal act. These are undisputed facts whether you accept them or not and I dont give a shit if you do. Thats on you. It was planned. It was a multitier attempt to stop the transition of power and give it to Trump.
 
Last edited:

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
Nope. I'm listening to them. Not assuming the worst but definitely preparing for it because there is the chance that dumb motherfuckers vote for this scumbag again in numbers enough to put him back in power. They are already putting their plans out there. I'm paying attention.

Your opinion on Jan 6th is easily the dumbest take ever and we will never see it the same clearly. They LITERALLY ATTACKED THE FUCKING CAPTIAL BUILDING. They broke in. The Capital police was intentionally undermanned on the day. The National Guard was not ALLOWED to deploy. Trump and his loyalists stoked them on. I watched it. It was recorded. HE IS UNDER CRIMINAL INDICTMENT FOR THIS VERY THING. They absolutely succeeded in stopping the certification and it was far from clear what was going to happen. If Pence had not decided to return and complete the process it was ABSOLUTELY unknown territory because there were plenty of GOP Senators and Reps on board with overturning the electoral college and sending back to the states where they had FAKE ELECTORS ready to go in swing states. Also a criminal act. These are undisputed facts whether you accept them or not and I dont give a shit if you do. Thats on you. It was planned. It was a multitier attempt to stop the transition of power and give it to Trump.

Damn, you're right. Those unarmed, unruly, unorganized Boomers nearly ended this great country!
7c755a83-a1c5-41cc-bfbe-a5732b74ac7c_text.gif
 
Last edited:

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
Damn, you're right. Those unarmed, unruly, unorganized Boomers nearly ended this great country!
7c755a83-a1c5-41cc-bfbe-a5732b74ac7c_text.gif
Purposefully misrepresenting what their plan was just so you can brush it off is laughable. They were there to cause chaos and stop the certification of the election. They did their part. Thank god Pence found his spine.

Just imagine for a moment if BLM had stormed the capital the same way the MAGA folks did. You guys would be calling for their executions by January 7th. The complete disconnect from reality regarding this topic is staggering.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
Purposefully misrepresenting what their plan was just so you can brush it off is laughable. They were there to cause chaos and stop the certification of the election. They did their part. Thank god Pence found his spine.

Just imagine for a moment if BLM had stormed the capital the same way the MAGA folks did. You guys would be calling for their executions by January 7th. The complete disconnect from reality regarding this topic is staggering.
I might be worried if BLM had stormed the capital, they're a bit more organized and did some major damage during the riots. People died as a direct result of their violence, as oppose to the heart attacks the protestors typically died of. I don't recall calling for any of their executions though, but I thought rioters that caused damage deserved jail time. I feel the same way about Jan 6ers that went beyond simple protesting.

It's a ton of what ifs, assumptions, and at the end of the day fearmongering. Trump tried calling off the dogs before the Guard ultimately ended the protest. It was an unorganized mob, they weren't going to accomplish anything of note. If the military had been on Trump's side maybe the fears would be founded. They weren't. A bunch of unarmed Boomers weren't going to usurp the government with the most powerful military in the world. The whole thing ended without a shot needing to be fired. It was so close though!
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
I might be worried if BLM had stormed the capital, they're a bit more organized and did some major damage during the riots. People died as a direct result of their violence, as oppose to the heart attacks the protestors typically died of. I don't recall calling for any of their executions though, but I thought rioters that caused damage deserved jail time. I feel the same way about Jan 6ers that went beyond simple protesting.

It's a ton of what ifs, assumptions, and at the end of the day fearmongering. Trump tried calling off the dogs before the Guard ultimately ended the protest. It was an unorganized mob, they weren't going to accomplish anything of note. If the military had been on Trump's side maybe the fears would be founded. They weren't. A bunch of unarmed Boomers weren't going to usurp the government with the most powerful military in the world. The whole thing ended without a shot needing to be fired. It was so close though!
Again with the misrepresenting. Impossible to get through to cult think like this.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,367
Reaction score
5,716
Purposefully misrepresenting what their plan was just so you can brush it off is laughable. They were there to cause chaos and stop the certification of the election. They did their part. Thank god Pence found his spine.

Just imagine for a moment if BLM had stormed the capital the same way the MAGA folks did. You guys would be calling for their executions by January 7th. The complete disconnect from reality regarding this topic is staggering.


But they're, you know, like, not.....patriots. But, again I can't believe we're stuck with Donald Trump! I only wish someone would do something about it! I'm a registered republican who's voted for him twice but MAN! We really need better options! Anyways, I'll fight vigorously to defend him BUT remember, I just want better options! And, it's the media's fault! I love the constitution, but come onnnnn everyone has those days they just wanna disregard it righhhhttttttt, anyways big conservative guy here!
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
Again with the misrepresenting. Impossible to get through to cult think like this.
What did I say that was misrepresented?
There were at least 19 people confirmed to have died as a result of the BLM protests, most of them shot, one burned alive, another run over as a Fex Ex truck was fleeing other looters.
On January 6th there were 5 deaths, but none caused by the protestors themselves: 3 were by natural causes, one by drug overdose, one shot by Capitol Police Officers.
Which protestors would you rather be hanging with under those circumstances?

Not part of any cult, my guy. I tend to look at what both sides are saying and look for a middle ground because that's typically where the truth exists. The January 6ers that damaged the Capitol, took government property, or were otherwise out of line/violent deserved time behind bars. The same is true for BLM protestors. The others committed no heinous acts and didn't deserve punishment. If January 6th was some organized event with a motive, who was calling the shots and directing traffic in real time? Why did they all magically give up when the Guard told them to stand down? Seems like they would have put up some sort of fight if they were really determined to, you know, overthrow things. I probably would have brought a weapon or two as well if that was the motive.

The truth is you guys have been sold a fictional outcome full of "what if's" by the media, and one that isn't logical given the evidence at hand. It's a result that not only wasn't probable, it was completely impossible. Even if the Jan 6ers had hunkered down and witlessly taken on the United States Military, how long do you think that encounter would have lasted? About 2 seconds. Democrats will bang the insurrection drum all day though, because fear mongering is a powerful tool.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
What did I say that was misrepresented?
There were at least 19 people confirmed to have died as a result of the BLM protests, most of them shot, one burned alive, another run over as a Fex Ex truck was fleeing other looters.
On January 6th there were 5 deaths, but none caused by the protestors themselves: 3 were by natural causes, one by drug overdose, one shot by Capitol Police Officers.
Which protestors would you rather be hanging with under those circumstances?

Not part of any cult, my guy. I tend to look at what both sides are saying and look for a middle ground because that's typically where the truth exists. The January 6ers that damaged the Capitol, took government property, or were otherwise out of line/violent deserved time behind bars. The same is true for BLM protestors. The others committed no heinous acts and didn't deserve punishment. If January 6th was some organized event with a motive, who was calling the shots and directing traffic in real time? Why did they all magically give up when the Guard told them to stand down? Seems like they would have put up some sort of fight if they were really determined to, you know, overthrow things. I probably would have brought a weapon or two as well if that was the motive.

The truth is you guys have been sold a fictional outcome full of "what if's" by the media, and one that isn't logical given the evidence at hand. It's a result that not only wasn't probable, it was completely impossible. Even if the Jan 6ers had hunkered down and witlessly taken on the United States Military, how long do you think that encounter would have lasted? About 2 seconds. Democrats will bang the insurrection drum all day though, because fear mongering is a powerful tool.
No one has EVER argued that Jim Bob and his dumb MAGA bitch wife were going to take control of the capitol and assume leadership of the government. That’s a bullshit republican strawman used to deflect what actually took place that day.

Answer this. It’s a simple yes or no question. Did Donald Trump want the certification of the election postponed?
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,075
It would have been worse, but it was the afternoon and time for the Boomers to get to Denny's for the senior discount, then a nap. Priorities man, priorities.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
No one has EVER argued that Jim Bob and his dumb MAGA bitch wife were going to take control of the capitol and assume leadership of the government. That’s a bullshit republican strawman used to deflect what actually took place that day.

Answer this. It’s a simple yes or no question. Did Donald Trump want the certification of the election postponed?

Well then what's all the hand wringing about?

Trump wanted it postponed, absolutely. He seemed to think Pence had the power to do that, but the recertification process is pretty clear that the VP's role is ceremonial at best. He has no power to overturn or postpone anything. So what Trump wanted and what was possible are two different things. It's effectively wishing for a unicorn, it's not possible.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
If Pence would've done what Trump wanted, what would've the series of events looked like? How long would've it taken to resolve?
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
If Pence would've done what Trump wanted, what would've the series of events looked like? How long would've it taken to resolve?
What Trump wanted and what Pence had the power to do are two different things. Pence's role in the process was ceremonial only. Per the AP:

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The vice president has no power to unilaterally “change” or overturn the presidential election results of a state under the Constitution or any law, experts say.
 
Last edited:

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
What Trump wanted and what Pence had the power to do are two different things. Pence's role in the process was ceremonial only. Per the AP:
No one thinks he actually had the "power" to do what Trump wanted. Trump has no qualms about doing things that he doesn't have the legal right to do, luckily Pence did.

If Pence had done what Trump wanted and illegally stopped the certification what do you imagine happens next?
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,393
No one thinks he actually had the "power" to do what Trump wanted. Trump has no qualms about doing things that he doesn't have the legal right to do, luckily Pence did.

If Pence had done what Trump wanted and illegally stopped the certification what do you imagine happens next?
Why are we discussing impossible situations? We've already established Pence didn't have the power to do anything. Discussing anything more is the land of make believe, where Trump likes to play.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,075
No one thinks he actually had the "power" to do what Trump wanted. Trump has no qualms about doing things that he doesn't have the legal right to do, luckily Pence did.

If Pence had done what Trump wanted and illegally stopped the certification what do you imagine happens next?
Pence was never going to do what Trump wanted. Like him or not, he's of high moral fiber and would never go down that path.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
No one thinks he actually had the "power" to do what Trump wanted. Trump has no qualms about doing things that he doesn't have the legal right to do, luckily Pence did.

If Pence had done what Trump wanted and illegally stopped the certification what do you imagine happens next?

Pence was never going to do what Trump wanted. Like him or not, he's of high moral fiber and would never go down that path.
I agree that Pence wasn't a real threat to ever do it.

But the question is relevant going forward. I can guarantee that Trump will choose a VP candidate that will do whatever Trump wants them to do the next time it comes up.

So the question remains. What would've happened to the confirmation process if Pence would've done as Trump requested. Would it be resolved on that day? Days later? Weeks later?
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Damn, you're right. Those unarmed, unruly, unorganized Boomers nearly ended this great country!
7c755a83-a1c5-41cc-bfbe-a5732b74ac7c_text.gif
Thats all you got? They werent unarmed and they werent all boomers so you got any other gaslighting strawmen to include? Its disgusting you are carrying these peoples water. Maybe you supported them this day? I'm having a hard time telling as I would think any red-blooded american would find their actions warranted and in keeping with the principles of a functioning constitutional republic, yet you are you are always defending them and their actions. Minimizing at every chance. I get the feeling you wanted them to succeed.

I'll add some facts to you r gaslighting strawmen:

Every weapon identified at the Insurrection so far.
Each of these was used against LEOs in an offensive manner. Stun guns, extendable batons, knives, hand axes, bats, clubs, aerosolized sprays, and a variety of improvised weapons. There were fire arms present and documented and taken from people in custody. There were at least two incidents of gun and ammo caches in vehicles and explosives parked in the vicinity of the capital. Even with these weapons and add into the fact the LEOs were intentionally kept undermanned and the NG was not allowed to deploy, and Trump allowed all of this to happen because he wanted it to happen, they succeeded. Yes. They got into the building and succeeded in a goal. Not their final goal but they stopped the certification process. The last formal step in Biden being confirmed as president.

Your defense of these clear treasonists is indefensible. They succeeded in breaking into the building and stopping the certification. You seem ok with this. They forced all members of congress plus Pence into hiding. You seem ok with this as well. Maybe you wanted it to succeed? I'm thinking you did by the way you always seem to come to their defense.

There were two things that occurred after the insurrection happened that eventually allowed the process to begin again.
1. Trump sent a tweet out telling everyone to leave. This was only after some of his White House counsel and staff convinced him he had to do it. Then after he sent a tweet out supporting the rioters. Per Cippilone ( White House Counsel):
In closed-door testimony to the Jan. 6 committee, former White House counsel Pat Cipollone implied then-President Donald Trump was alone in his opposition to taking further action to convince rioters at the US Capitol to disperse and go home.

Cipollone, who recently appeared before the committee after receiving a subpoena for his testimony, said he and virtually every other senior aide in the White House that day had urged Trump to tell people to go home as his supporters violently stormed the Halls of Congress.

"When you talk about others on the staff thinking more should be done or thinking that the President needed to tell people to go home, who would you put in that category? Cipollone was asked by Rep. Liz Cheney during his deposition.

"Well, I would put in that category... in terms of a positive push to get a positive effort to get more done faster, Pat Philbin, Eric Herschmann," Cipollone responded, naming two other White House attorneys.

"Overall, Mark Meadows, Ivanka. Once Jared got there, Jared, General [Keith] Kellogg," he continued. "I'm probably missing some, but those are – Kayleigh [McEnany] was there."

Cipollone was then asked who "on the staff" or "in the White House" did not want the rioters to leave the Capitol.

"I can't think of anybody on that day who didn't want people to get out of the Capitol... particularly once the violence started," Cipollone testified.
Asked if he would include Trump in that camp, Cipollone, who has been cautious about potential executive privilege violations, said he couldn't reveal communications between himself and Trump "but obviously, I think you know – yeah."

Jan. 6 select committee member Rep. Adam Kinzinger took Cipollone's testimony as indication that Trump, who other witnesses have previously said was resistant to asking his supporters to stand down, was not on board with efforts to try and halt the violence.

"There really is no ambiguity about what he said," Kinzinger said of Cipollone's testimony. "Almost everybody wanted President Trump to instruct the mob to disperse. President Trump refused."

2. Pence had a decision to make while in hiding and knowing that Trump had pressured him to stop the counting earlier and continuously through the day while the insurrection happened. No one else. Only Pence. He had to decide whether or not to start the process up again or not (going against Trump's requests) and send it back to the states where there was an already organized plan with Fake Electors to give the election to Trump. Pence had already been approached by Fake Electors trying to physically hand him their elector slate earlier in the day to count as part of the certification process (a crime). He ultimately made the decision to start it up again but all he had to do was not start it up and then it became a case of what to do next and who does what. Had he chosen otherwise or claimed some power that doesnt exist or isnt CLEARLY defined, we have a very good idea what would have happened and the plan would have been to return the electors to the state and those states with the fake electors who through legislative action or scumfuckery....would have ignored the will of the voters and given the election to Trump.
 
Last edited:

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
I agree that Pence wasn't a real threat to ever do it.

But the question is relevant going forward. I can guarantee that Trump will choose a VP candidate that will do whatever Trump wants them to do the next time it comes up.

So the question remains. What would've happened to the confirmation process if Pence would've done as Trump requested. Would it be resolved on that day? Days later? Weeks later?
The plan has been revealed. Its out there. With the help of GOP in congress they would have disputed the certification in court and used a legal process or argument(s) to return the certifications back to the state. There is some very vague and untested legal paths that allows each state to revisit or reassess their electors in contested elections. Had these gone to SCOTUS I think we can all assume how this court would have ruled in favor of state's rights. The GOP had fake slates of electors all ready to go in each swing state and with those in place and the majority of these states with GOP controlled state legislations, I think we can all piece together what would have happened. They would have nullified the initial electors and used the fake electors. All of this would have been occurring with a constant stream of BIG LIE social media and Fox News coverage/indoctrination using the BIG lie as cover to force through political action in the swing states and GOP in congress doing all they could to make that happen.

You can read about the plan per Kenneth Chesebro's and other lawyer's testimony in Georgia and Michigan criminal investigations.
 
Last edited:

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Why are we discussing impossible situations? We've already established Pence didn't have the power to do anything. Discussing anything more is the land of make believe, where Trump likes to play.
This is ridiculous. They had a plan and it was clearly defined. Stop the certification. Send the electors back to states. Let GOP controlled states reassess their electors and replace them with the fake electors that were ready to go on Jan 6. These are all facts that are in criminal investigation testimony and Jan 6 committee records, Jack Smith's filings in the Jan 6 case, facts from testimony and filings in the Georgia RICO case, facts and testimony from Rudy Guilianis defamation, admissions of guilt and proffers from Sydney Powell and Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesbro, and other Georgia RICO criminals.... Pence was also being pressured and was actively asking if he had the power to do so to other people, lawyers, even former VPs. It wasnt clear. It was an honor system, a formality. All he had to do was say hey...I'm not sure what to do here. We should halt and let the courts figure it out.

If you arent aware of these facts then your point is even worse than your egregiously erroneous statements above. Trump has no shortage of loyalists willing to make his land of make believe a reality.

 
Last edited:

bobbyok1

Dominates Wiffle Ball
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
1,287
Why are we discussing impossible situations? We've already established Pence didn't have the power to do anything. Discussing anything more is the land of make believe, where Trump likes to play.
If Pence did not have the power to do anything, why did the Uniparty quickly act to reform the law in regards to the VP's power? He did have the authority to send the count back to state legislatures to look further into possible election fraud.

 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
Why are we discussing impossible situations? We've already established Pence didn't have the power to do anything. Discussing anything more is the land of make believe, where Trump likes to play.
This would be like your wife planning on having you murdered. She gets your in-laws to agree to pay for it. But the hitman she contacts is an undercover cop. The cop would never have done it so her plan could have never worked! Therefor none of them should be in trouble!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top