johnnd05
Johnny T. works for me
- Messages
- 4,522
- Reaction score
- 275
So can someone who's been following things more closely please explain to me WTF is going on with this whole Ron Zook/shady recruiting practices situation? All I've got is that the (New York? Chicago Sun?) Times ran an article on NSD about how no one could understand how Zook was doing so well in recruiting, and there was a quote in it from John-El to the effect that "where there's smoke, there's fire". Then Ronny gets all pissed (which is perhaps understandable) and says that these allegations were planted by a rival school that got the Times to run the story on NSD in an attempt to damage the Illini recruiting class (which seems ludicrous -- wouldn't you at least run it the day BEFORE if you wanted to do maximum damage?). All of a sudden everyone in the media seems to know, though Zook and everyone else at Illinois refuse to be quoted as saying, that it was Notre Dame that planted the allegations and got the story to run. Plus Illinois says they've hired a lawyer to investigate the source of some internet rumors (which were presumably distinct from the push to write the article) that they'd given cars to Juice Williams and Aurellious Benn.
Whew.
So what I'm trying to understand is: WHY is Illinois convinced that the article, and the internet rumors, were cooked up by another program in an attempt to damage their recruiting, as opposed to by a reporter trying (and succeeding, mind you!) to get some readership, and some crazy rumor-mongering fans (this is what we do, of course), respectively? And secondly, given that Smith IS quoted in the article, and no ND coaches are quoted at all, WHY is Illinois (or perhaps just the media) convinced that the source of said slander was Notre Dame as opposed to someone else?
I eagerly await some explanation.
Whew.
So what I'm trying to understand is: WHY is Illinois convinced that the article, and the internet rumors, were cooked up by another program in an attempt to damage their recruiting, as opposed to by a reporter trying (and succeeding, mind you!) to get some readership, and some crazy rumor-mongering fans (this is what we do, of course), respectively? And secondly, given that Smith IS quoted in the article, and no ND coaches are quoted at all, WHY is Illinois (or perhaps just the media) convinced that the source of said slander was Notre Dame as opposed to someone else?
I eagerly await some explanation.

