TomHaverford
Banned
- Messages
- 943
- Reaction score
- 51
I agree, he's a nice RB prospect but was probably a little high early on. He seemed to mature quickly and then kind of max out so far. I'd bet he's able to get to another level in college, he just wasn't able to do that from last year to this.
yeah, I'd agree with all of that.
To me a 5* HS RB looks like Adrian Peterson or Reggie Bush or Leonard Fournette or Beanie Wells or Jabrill Peppers. Hell I still think Peppers is the best RB on Michigan's team right now today, and he could be an All-American type player at that position if he focused on that position only.
Hell I didn't think Damien Harris was a 5* RB even when he was committed to Michigan for that long stretch of time.
I think this goes back to the conversation of what is a 5* and how do you rank a kid a 5*. For me a 5* should be cream of the crop.
Go ahead and rank kids 1-300 or 250 or 247, but imo limit the 5*'s to those really deserving of it. It's not a big deal if you only have 5 or 10 5*'s and then the rest of the 90 or 95 kids are ranked as 4*'s and ranked in order 6-100 or 11-100. Or whatever. IDK to me that's just a way better way of doing things. I don't see the need for... "we have to have 32 5* STARZ every class!" like 247/Rivals or the "we have to have 50 FIVE STARZ every class" like Scout.