JadeBrecks
MOΛΩN ΛABE
- Messages
- 4,982
- Reaction score
- 371
Thats a ****** ****in call. it was over his head.
Dude you have got to be ****in kidding me. These ******* refs.
Seeing Tom Brady so butthurt just makes my day. I love it. Chewing out the refs running off the field and through the tunnel...cmon man. Good or bad call just man up go shake the other teams hand and leave
That ref obviously deserves to be fired, and hopefully loses his home and has to live outside. And someday, if I find him living under a bridge and washing windshields at red lights for spare change, I will run him over with my Range Rover.
What? Yeah, if the refs took the game from you at the end you wouldn't ask for an explanation?
Also, did you see his press conference? Way too much class. I admit that I am probably the worst loser in the history of life, but if I was him this would be my press conference:
Ref should have said it was uncatchable wheat hey picked the flag up.
Ref should have said it was uncatchable wheat hey picked the flag up.
Seeing Tom Brady so butthurt just makes my day. I love it. Chewing out the refs running off the field and through the tunnel...cmon man. Good or bad call just man up go shake the other teams hand and leave
I didnt see the press conference. But theres a difference between asking an explanation and doing what he did. You cant say the refs took the game from them, it would have gave them one last opportunity to MAYBE win. I think its pass interference, but you cant leave the game up to that one call. There were many other opportunities to convert on a third down or anywhere else in the game. If a game is decided on a refs judgement call then thats on the team for being in that situation. Give the ref a break man it wasnt the super bowl im sure there were many other bad calls in the game
Yeah, except it wasn't uncatchable at all. The only reason it appeared uncatchable is because Gronkowski was grabbed and pulled five yards away from the play. Had he not been interfered with and had stopped and came back toward the ball from the spot where Kuechly first grabbed him, it would have hit him in the chest.
I get if the ball was picked off by a linebacker at the 10 yard line or something you would say that the interference was meaningless because the ball never got down the field to him, but in this case it was a coward ref not wanting to make the right call in that stadium. All of the analysts and referees agree that it should have been a call. Only the geriatric former ref on ESPN who appears to have precisely zero marbles left thought it was the right no-call.
Was that actually a bad call? I was a bit out of it/half asleep when it happened, but it seemed reasonable to me that if the patch was uncatchable due to an underthrow they would wipe out PI.
I could understand calling holding or illegal contact though.