G
GBdomer
Guest
Go Hawks wish I could join you guys in this draft give Ironman another *** kicking.
I am going to draft Giroux just to trade him to a Rangers fan for Adam Henrique, just to spite KPENN
And to think I voted for you for mod of the year.
not letting me in. maybe you already have 12
take that as a yes?
Just saw I have the 1st..this looks shady..no I am not Bettman
I just rejected it. Too lopsided. Need a better balanced deal fellas.
Ehhh I think if two teams agree to a deal, it should go through unless there is collusion.. Penner knows what he's doing.
I thought that at first, honestly did but that's just too much for one guy though. Nash, Kane, Lucic, and Myers just for Giroux?
I'm not trying to be judge and jury. Truly am not but I think a little more of a balanced deal is in the best interest of the league.
Am I out of line? Honest question.
You make me want to punch my computer screen every time I see your signature KPENN
I thought that at first, honestly did but that's just too much for one guy though. Nash, Kane, Lucic, and Myers just for Giroux?
I'm not trying to be judge and jury. Truly am not but I think a little more of a balanced deal is in the best interest of the league.
Am I out of line? Honest question.
I think it's really nice![]()
You have forced a rebuttal GIF on my part.
It's just my belief that it is a real slippery slope when people try to decide what trades are fair and what aren't. They both know their hockey, and agreed to the deal. It should be that simple IMO.
Penner would be getting a top 3 player IMO, and there are always guys on the waiver wire who can do what Myers and Lucic can do if you are quick enough to grab them.
So your rebuttal is a cheap shot?![]()
I like that 2nd trade you proposed. The only thing i'm worried about is Rick Nash becoming a Flyer killer and i'd at least like the fantasy points he gets against my team. Haha
Have your people call my people.
I'll get back to you sometime tomorrow. Let me think it over a bit more