It's not absurd, it's shrewd. Twenty years ago SEC Commissioner Roy Kramer put together the strategy.Under the old SEC format there was an axiom "you can't win the SEC with two losses" that goes back 70 years or so. They powers that be played each other, and knocked each other off. Kramer convinced the powers that be that adding teams, splitting into divisions, adding MORE cupcakes on a coordinated basis, locking up bowl slot contracts, increased revenue sharing to allow the VU's and UK's to get compensated for their beatings, AND a post season championship game would guarantee the SEC a post season additional bump in the polls thus securing a slot in the NCG.
It works. Feeding 30-35 recruits a year into the football factories doesn't hurt either. But the plan was by design. It would preclude a Notre Dame from getting their choice of bowl bids as was the case in the 60's and 70's.
Then SEC Commissioner Kramer became the first BCS Czar ensuring that his work would be protected by a secret coaches poll which is required to vote the winner of the NCG game #1 regardless of other games. He boxed the likes of ND out of the selection process then guaranteed there would be no repeat of '77 when ND knocked off #1, a couple of other top teams lost their bowl, and ND leaped over Alabama based on destroying unbeaten #1 Texas while Bama played a weaker opponent in the friendly confines of the Sugar Bowl. NEVER AGAIN, the SEC said and they've made that happen.
ND can win the NC now only because they will have beaten the SEC's hand picked candidate.
The SEC's motto should be "nosus decipio", We cheat.
They got the rules changed to give them an unfair advantage. Their reply, "you can do the same thing" which set off the Conference Alignment Wars which continues today with ACC founder Maryland going to the Big Ten.
Absurd? I understand your point but the John D. Rockefeller's, Andrew Carnegie's, the ruthless, successful robber baron types would say, "Well done, SEC, brillant strategy and excellent execution."