I have said before, and I will say it again, I don't really care which pick Jimmy goes at. I just want him to get a good opportunity. I'm from Green Bay, and so I know that Aaron Rodgers' slide may have been the best thing that ever happened to him.
With that being said, this is the worst analysis I have ever seen. Most fifth-graders could probably see how terrible this is:
"Jimmy Clausen, Notre Dame Fighting Irish
(62.2 completion percentage, 34 games started)
Clausen is perhaps the most controversial prospect in the draft, and his pro viability has yielded strong opinions from both Mel Kiper and Todd McShay.
Both Kiper and McShay know more about the draft and college players than we do, but our system suggests that the young upstart has got this one down over the legend. Clausen's list of comparable quarterbacks is uninspiring -- notably Rex Grossman (61.0 completion percentage, 31 games started) and Vince Young (61.8 completion percentage, 32 games started). The Young comp seems more promising now than a year ago, but remember that a huge part of Young's success is his ability to run with the football; Clausen isn't bringing that with him to the pro level."
Jimmy Clausen is to Vince Young as John Wooden is to Bill Cowher... not many similarities.
Here's the article, think it's premium tho:
Projecting 2010 NFL draft QBs with LCF - NFL Draft - Football Outsiders - ESPN