New Rule Needed for CFB

scUM Hater

Live to see scUM lose.
Messages
2,438
Reaction score
145
The play that ended the first half between Duke and Cincinnati needs to be looked at. For those not watching, Duke kicker makes 53 yard field goal but it is disallowed due to the fact that Cincinnati ran an extra guy out there (refs threw a flag). He then missed the 48 yarder. The kicking team should be allowed to decline that type of penalty. Cinci had no timeouts, a way to "ice" the kicker. Any thoughts?
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
I have no idea why it isn't a continuation penalty like almost every other pre-snap defensive penalty. 12 men on the field, offsides, etc. That was some BS.
 

JadeBrecks

MOΛΩN ΛABE
Messages
4,982
Reaction score
371
Any defensive penalty should be a continuation penalty other than unabated to the QB and encroachment.
 

Rocky2820

New member
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
56
Agree that continuation is the problem here. To not be able to decline that penalty is ridiculous. It's not like anyone's in danger, which would warrant blowing it dead right away.
 
Top