For those lamenting ND's cupcake schedule.
Feldman response:
Regardless of Michigan = UGA (which may not be so far fetched as RichRod's in Year 2 of Grand Plan will UGA replaces a franchise QB), Feldman makes Bob in the Bay Area's point. Feldman expects ND to win 10 games with their schedule but only 1 less with UF's.
Interesting point that Feldman slips in is:
Everyone knows that a post season league championship is not a regular season game but Feldman falls in the web SEC Commissioner Kramer (later BCS Founding Czar Kramer) planned when he initiated the SEC Championship. Pollsters will preceive it to be a regular season game and give the SEC Champ a boost for "tougher" scheduling at voting time.
They neglect that Kramer purposely split the SEC into 2 divisions so he could eliminate tough matchups like Bama vs Tennessee, AKA "The Third Saturday in October". From 1928 to 1992 the two teams played on that date. Since '92 the rivals have only met 5 times.
There used to be a rule of thumb that "You can't win the SEC with 2 losses". Kramer ended that with his two division scheme to minimize league games, soften the schedule with more cupcakes, and ensure the maximum number of bowl eligible SEC teams to fill their bowl contracted slots (Kramer also championed league/bowl tie-ins).
To head off "weak schedule" complaints he added the SEC Championship. Keep in mind only the top two SEC teams play so there's only 1 more loss for the league. In the one Division format like the PAC-10 the conference teams face each other more often resulting in more league losses and minimizing bowl eligible teams.
Hence JoePa cry this week for the Big 10 to go to 12 teams and a playoff. He sees how the SEC and Big 12 teams get more $$$ with a championship game but also have an easier road to the BCS.
From Bob in the Bay Area: Fun little exercise for you. The most dominant team in the country is Florida, National Champs. Here is their schedule vs. the Irish's supposedly "cake" schedule. Be curious as to how many weeks Florida has an easier opponent than Notre Dame.
ND vs UF
Nevada = Charleston Southern
Washington St = Troy
Navy = Florida International
Connecticut = Mississippi State
Stanford = Vanderbilt
Washington = Arkansas
Purdue = Kentucky
Boston College = Tennessee
Michigan State = South Carolina
Pittsburgh = Florida State
Michigan = Georgia
USC = LSU
Now, who has the "easy" schedule again???
Also, the historical strength of most of these schools when the schedules were made (i.e. Washington), might give you a different viewpoint.
Feldman response:
Thanks for the note. You raise an interesting point, although I do think where Michigan is compared to Georgia is pretty far off at this point. I'd say the same for FSU and Pitt. Plus, UF also probably would have to beat another top 10 team in the SEC title. That's going through four top 25 teams and probably three in the top 15 (LSU, UGA and the SEC West champ). I doubt you'll see anyone other than USC in the top 25 on ND schedule. I'm not arguing against having traditional opponents who are now struggling like a Michigan or Washington. Like I argued that it shouldn't have been dismissed that Utah did go to Michigan and should get credit for winning a game that was scheduled at a time when the Wolverines were a powerhouse.
In ND's case, I'm making my point about why this team has a legit shot to win 10 games this season because I think it would be favored in 11 of them. (You should see some of the e-mails I've received from fans about this who keep trying to remind me that Charlie Weis is still the coach there and about the teams they lost to last year.) Anyhow, if they had Florida's schedule, I probably wouldn't expect more than nine.
Regardless of Michigan = UGA (which may not be so far fetched as RichRod's in Year 2 of Grand Plan will UGA replaces a franchise QB), Feldman makes Bob in the Bay Area's point. Feldman expects ND to win 10 games with their schedule but only 1 less with UF's.
Interesting point that Feldman slips in is:
Plus, UF also probably would have to beat another top 10 team in the SEC title.
Everyone knows that a post season league championship is not a regular season game but Feldman falls in the web SEC Commissioner Kramer (later BCS Founding Czar Kramer) planned when he initiated the SEC Championship. Pollsters will preceive it to be a regular season game and give the SEC Champ a boost for "tougher" scheduling at voting time.
They neglect that Kramer purposely split the SEC into 2 divisions so he could eliminate tough matchups like Bama vs Tennessee, AKA "The Third Saturday in October". From 1928 to 1992 the two teams played on that date. Since '92 the rivals have only met 5 times.
There used to be a rule of thumb that "You can't win the SEC with 2 losses". Kramer ended that with his two division scheme to minimize league games, soften the schedule with more cupcakes, and ensure the maximum number of bowl eligible SEC teams to fill their bowl contracted slots (Kramer also championed league/bowl tie-ins).
To head off "weak schedule" complaints he added the SEC Championship. Keep in mind only the top two SEC teams play so there's only 1 more loss for the league. In the one Division format like the PAC-10 the conference teams face each other more often resulting in more league losses and minimizing bowl eligible teams.
Hence JoePa cry this week for the Big 10 to go to 12 teams and a playoff. He sees how the SEC and Big 12 teams get more $$$ with a championship game but also have an easier road to the BCS.