IrishinSyria
In truth lies victory
- Messages
- 6,042
- Reaction score
- 1,920
This is supposed to be reassuring?
Elko is holding back. Let’s not go in talking Shyte.I did the SEC trial today to watch T A&M... They are not as strong as last year. Irish should put them on their heels.
Their defense is suspect... No talking shit on thatElko is holding back. Let’s not go in talking Shyte.
They’re more balanced on offense than last year based on early returns. If you think Elko allowed the offense to open up in two tune up games before playing at ND, then you’re setting yourself up for disappointment. But y’all go ahead and predict another ND blowout win based on nothing but emotions.I did the SEC trial today to watch T A&M... They are not as strong as last year. Irish should put them on their heels.
Who said blowout.... You have a reading problem. I said 'on their heels. And... Was stating about their defense. And I watched the T A&M game so it wasn't a 'delusional' statement.They’re more balanced on offense than last year based on early returns. If you think Elko allowed the offense to open up in two tune up games before playing at ND, then you’re setting yourself up for disappointment. But y’all go ahead and predict another ND blowout win based on nothing but emotions.
You have a reading comprehension problem. I said “y’all” based on the majority of ND fans predicting a blowout win over Miami last week. Had I said “you”, then you would have a point. I watched the game, too. Pretty clear that Elko had them playing a vanilla as possible. This is his 3rd shot at ND as a HC & while they say it’s all about winning the SEC West, he wants this win just as bad.Who said blowout.... You have a reading problem. I said 'on their heels. And... Was stating about their defense. And I watched the T A&M game so it wasn't a 'delusional' statement.
Yet y'all means quoting my post......You have a reading comprehension problem. I said “y’all” based on the majority of ND fans predicting a blowout win over Miami last week. Had I said “you”, then you would have a point. I watched the game, too. Pretty clear that Elko had them playing a vanilla as possible. This is his 3rd shot at ND as a HC & while they say it’s all about winning the SEC West, he wants this win just as bad.
If you quoted him in your response, it's totally reasonable for him to assume that the y'all was directed primarily at him along with others. You may not have meant it that way, but that's how everyone on this board would've responded to you if you would've quoted any of us.You have a reading comprehension problem. I said “y’all” based on the majority of ND fans predicting a blowout win over Miami last week. Had I said “you”, then you would have a point. I watched the game, too. Pretty clear that Elko had them playing a vanilla as possible. This is his 3rd shot at ND as a HC & while they say it’s all about winning the SEC West, he wants this win just as bad.
"Great news for ND's OL: They suck on every play! Here's detailed evidence!"This is supposed to be reassuring?
Ya'll got a major communication problem.You have a reading comprehension problem. I said “y’all” based on the majority of ND fans predicting a blowout win over Miami last week. Had I said “you”, then you would have a point. I watched the game, too. Pretty clear that Elko had them playing a vanilla as possible. This is his 3rd shot at ND as a HC & while they say it’s all about winning the SEC West, he wants this win just as bad.
Most likely Miami is a 3 loss team. More so if they attempt to run out the clock with a small lead.This has to be the national consensus, by the way. ND lost on a field goal with a minute left playing a top 10 team on the road. None of these other teams can say that.
Those clips lend credence to the theory that Miami knew the snap count."Great news for ND's OL: They suck on every play! Here's detailed evidence!"
I don't add much to the conversations but I'm willing to jump in here: using colloquial terms like "y'all" is poor form in general but in particular in the written format. Also, who could blame you for reading the comment, which contains the word "all" as part of the phrase (all meaning everything, everybody, all people or things present)? Finally, the poster was replying and quoted you so when he uses the phrase "y'all", I don't see how he could assume it didn't include, if not being directed explicitly toward, you.Yet y'all means quoting my post......
