I watched the first 30 seconds of this clip and there is nothing objectionable. He is calling out *specific people* who have beclowned themselves recently. Kentaji Jackson gets crapped on by her fellow Supreme Court justices. Joy Reid got fired for being a vitriolic, racist, unintelligent blowhard that MSNBC couldn't even stomach.
There is absolute loads of data from dating apps on who is considered attractive / unattractive for both men and women. Short, bald, poor men are less attractive than tall, buff, rich dudes. Older women -- especially those with kids from past relationships -- are less attractive than younger women without baggage. What is your objection here? And hormonal birth control has moodiness, depression, and headaches listed as side effects.
His specific quote that you linked is that the "permanent bureaucracy" from the Civil Rights Act was a mistake and he acknowledges that it's a tough position. At no point as has he ever suggested that black people should not have the same rights as everyone else, but you are implying otherwise.
1. I would never think or say this, nor would most normal people, but do you actually not understand what DEI is and the point he is making? Hint: it's that without DEI you would never have to question someone's qualifications, but when you intentionally put in systems to elevate less qualified people over more qualified people then you have to question whether someone "earned it" or not... and that hypothetically applies to every field. While I disagree with this position and outlandish phrasing, one could easily "debate" the DEI topic and there are tons of better examples of DEI causing issues in medical school, etc.
2. I didn't read that whole article but at least in the first few paragraphs there is nothing there. What specific theory did he share and where is it in the article?
3. Demographic replacement is an inarguable fact and all statistics show this. Are you saying that that demographics aren't changing? What exactly is the position here that is crazy? That our laws contribute to changing demographics?
4. Japan literally just replaced their Prime Minister because the populous agreed with him about immigration.
5. Is the email you linked here inauthentic or do you not like the phrasing of "grooming"?
Basically you posted eight things where I personally disagree with a lot of them but there is only objectionable language in ~2 of them and most of his takes are rooted in some sort of facts. Therefor, because you disagree with him, he should be shot?