I agree with you NeuteredDoomer. I personally have no problem with a guy saying for us not to get overexcited about one win; hell, I was preaching patience the entire offseason. We were 3-9 for Pate's sake last year.
However, I have a problem with the premise. Just because 'Team A' beat 'Team B', and Team B beat 'Team C', it doesn't mean that Team A will beat 'Team C'. And the same thing goes for his stats. ND and Central Michigan are totally different teams, playing under totally different circumstances. It's a totally different ballgame.
I had this same argument with another poster after last week's game. He was all into stats and gave me a million numbers of why our offense wasn't improving and why JC wasn't any good. And I kept on coming back w/ how I saw progress with MY EYES (the way we played, adjustments by receivers, improved athleticism, JC's 'zip', etc.) Stats are good for certain things, but they don't tell nearly the whole story. If you rely on pure stats as that one poster did, then you are missing most of the story. Because there are tons of things stats can't cover.
But the original poster is right in a way. We have a long ways to go. We're nowhere near BCS ready ----- yet. But it was good to get a dominating win, to play good football, and I for one was happy to enjoy more than a few beers in celebration that night, negative posters be damned...