Fall 2021 Roster

longliveautrydenson

Active member
Messages
771
Reaction score
92
I think that if anyone expects the last few years they might be severely disappointed. We lost a lot on the offensive side of the ball.

I think if we have only lost 2-3 games at the end of the season, it would be a pretty huge success. Even with our somewhat favorable schedule.

I would be disappointed with anything less than 11-1.

—We’ll have the best defense in every game we play this year. —We’ll have the best RBs and TEs in every game.
—Our only returning OL would’ve been an AA but for an injury.
—We’ve recruited better along than OL than our opponents.

In 2012, we had a strong defense, RB/TE-heavy offense, makeshift OL, and unreliable QB play. Sound familiar? That team had less depth and a tougher schedule than the 2021 team. If we could win 12 games then, there’s no reason we should expect a 3-4 loss season now.
 

irish4ever

Well-known member
Messages
3,792
Reaction score
896
I would be disappointed with anything less than 11-1.

—We’ll have the best defense in every game we play this year. —We’ll have the best RBs and TEs in every game.
—Our only returning OL would’ve been an AA but for an injury.
—We’ve recruited better along than OL than our opponents.

In 2012, we had a strong defense, RB/TE-heavy offense, makeshift OL, and unreliable QB play. Sound familiar? That team had less depth and a tougher schedule than the 2021 team. If we could win 12 games then, there’s no reason we should expect a 3-4 loss season now.

Good points made. The Irish will be facing 3 of the top 4-5 QB's in the country (UNC, U$C and Cincy), so the secondary is going to need to be 'spot on' in those games in particular. Luckily, schedule wise, all three games will be played at home!
 

FightingIrishLover7

All troll, no substance
Messages
12,703
Reaction score
7,514
I truly think Coan is going to be an improvement, with regards to "overall" playbook, over Ian.
In fact, in the spring game, I (anyway) noticed a notable difference between the playbook Coan and Pyne were running. Pyne's seemed much more in line with the Ian playbook.

With that said, barring no major injuries and a healthy KA, I see no reason why our O couldn't be better than last year. I'll go ahead and say I think it's going to be improved.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,769
Reaction score
10,145
I’m more optimistic than I was a month or two ago but I’m usually a glass half full type of guy. I think there was some progress in the areas I was worried about. DB and OL. And, I expect the defense to be really good. I think Freeman inherited a group that is going to work very well for him. A lot of experience in the front 7 with active and athletic dudes. Coan will be a solid distributor of the ball. Less spectacular more consistent.

On either side of the ball I try to look for guys that will step up and become difference makers or guys that will continue to be so. Then how many of them does each side of the ball have. I think the list is growing on both sides of the ball and that makes me feel pretty confident.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
Has your opinion changed at all after the spring game?

After the spring game, I think it is less likely that we will be total butt. I think that our OL will have problems but not be so bad that we get spanked by physical teams. I think CB isn't in as dire of a situation as I originally believed... I think they will be competent.
 

Trait Expectations

New member
Messages
887
Reaction score
455
I think our avg PPG goes up this year, not sure about defensive PPG allowed? Still uncertain how good our secondary can be. Excited to find out
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,577
Reaction score
20,027
I truly think Coan is going to be an improvement, with regards to "overall" playbook, over Ian.
In fact, in the spring game, I (anyway) noticed a notable difference between the playbook Coan and Pyne were running. Pyne's seemed much more in line with the Ian playbook.

With that said, barring no major injuries and a healthy KA, I see no reason why our O couldn't be better than last year. I'll go ahead and say I think it's going to be improved.

I agree. I think we'll see a more diverse playbook that will keep the D from attacking a specific segment of the O.


I’m more optimistic than I was a month or two ago but I’m usually a glass half full type of guy. I think there was some progress in the areas I was worried about. DB and OL. And, I expect the defense to be really good. I think Freeman inherited a group that is going to work very well for him. A lot of experience in the front 7 with active and athletic dudes. Coan will be a solid distributor of the ball. Less spectacular more consistent.

On either side of the ball I try to look for guys that will step up and become difference makers or guys that will continue to be so. Then how many of them does each side of the ball have. I think the list is growing on both sides of the ball and that makes me feel pretty confident.

The improvement in depth over the last few years has allowed the coaches to get a lot of players into the games, so when the next year rolls around the next guy in line is ready to start. Kelly has this program at a level where it is reload, not rebuild. Now reload may not mean a spot in the playoffs, but it doesn't mean 3-4 losses either.
 

Edge

Well-known member
Messages
220
Reaction score
347
The defense will have them in every game

Can the O score enough?
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,314
Reaction score
13,087
This kid was linked to ND, anyhow he's headed to Duke

[TWEET]https://twitter.com/RivalsPortal/status/1392119057088921602?s=20[/TWEET]
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,104
Reaction score
27,367
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/rivalsportal/status/1394686730243133441?s=21[/TWEET]

With Evans I was thinking just snag any talent like that but something was clearly examined at the state of the DB room.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,104
Reaction score
27,367
Might be false alarm according to the pay sites. Sounds like some interest but no offer. Maybe misunderstanding?
 
Top