Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE.

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
E2A06086-2855-4372-BB5E-945295D5B48E.jpeg

Elon now Evil to left because he’s uncovering a leftist corruption scheme that has contributed to our gigantic debt. If these were NRA grants, etc.. Elon would still be your hero.
 
Last edited:

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,120
Reaction score
12,957
View attachment 3058466

Elon now Evil to left because he’s uncovering a leftist corruption scheme that has contributed to our gigantic debt. If these were NRA grants, etc.. Elon would still be your hero.
You finding something to be a waste of spending does not make it "corruption". That word has lost all meaning. This money is all congressionally approved. You can literally look all this shit up if you feel like it.

If you don't think there is just as much wasteful GOP spending I have a bridge to sell you. I sure wonder why DOGE hasn't "uncovered" any of those programs lol.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
You finding something to be a waste of spending does not make it "corruption". That word has lost all meaning. This money is all congressionally approved. You can literally look all this shit up if you feel like it.

If you don't think there is just as much wasteful GOP spending I have a bridge to sell you. I sure wonder why DOGE hasn't "uncovered" any of those programs lol.
Principally, I'm not against the idea of reducing "wasteful" spending, but that devil in that is in the details. Trump and his cronies have painted USAID, who accounts for something like .015% of the entire federal budget, as some great "waste" of money. Are there some things on the line items that I kind of roll my eyes at? Sure....but that's true of any department in history...US Govt or not. The issue is Trump and Co are painting every spend they ideologically disagree with as "fraud". It's not. They just disagree with the spend. USAID did A LOT of good around the world in helping developing nations facing disease, famine, and the like. They were one of the biggest weapons we had in combating the AIDS epidemic in Africa.
Made this exact point almost a month ago in a different thread.

MAGA has made the terms "waste" and "fraud" mean nothing. If "everything" is fraud..then nothing is fraud.

As I said above I'm sure there was stuff in USAID and other areas of the Fed where I wouldn't agree with where the money was going. That doesn't make it "fraud" or "corruption". By all accounts this money was going to where it was supposed to go and used for it's expressed purpose. The definitionally isn't fraud or corruption...they just disagree with the purpose the money is being spent on.

More than willing to discuss spend by spend or program by program, on why I agree or disagree with the individual spend but simply labeling "DEI Spending in India" as "fraud" because they don't understand why that might be useful is counterproductive.

..and if all this spending was so "fraudulent" or "corrupt" I'd have to wonder why Trump and his justice department isn't hauling people to court/before Congress.
 
Last edited:

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
Yeah 2 billion rerouted to Stacy Abrams ngo for refrigerators isn’t covered in fraud as well as millions to media companies for $10,000 subscriptions. That’s just a couple of many examples. Your side is corrupt as can be between lawfare and money laundering. At some point you need to own reality. You guys are a lost cause.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,120
Reaction score
12,957
Yeah 2 billion rerouted to Stacy Abrams ngo for refrigerators isn’t covered in fraud as well as millions to media companies for $10,000 subscriptions. That’s just a couple of many examples. Your side is corrupt as can be between lawfare and money laundering. At some point you need to own reality. You guys are a lost cause.
Just complete horseshit that can be dispelled with 5 minutes of googling. It's incredible the way your brain works.
 

Gladiator

Banned
Messages
1,359
Reaction score
1,018
Made this exact point almost a month ago in a different thread.

MAGA has made the terms "waste" and "fraud" mean nothing. If "everything" is fraud..then nothing is fraud.

As I said above I'm sure there was stuff in USAID and other areas of the Fed where I wouldn't agree with where the money was going. That doesn't make it "fraud" or "corruption". By all accounts this money was going to where it was supposed to go and used for it's expressed purpose. The definitionally isn't fraud or corruption...they just disagree with the purpose the money is being spent on.

More than willing to discuss spend by spend or program by program, on why I agree or disagree with the individual spend but simply labeling "DEI Spending in India" as "fraud" because they don't understand why that might be useful is counterproductive.

..and if all this spending was so "fraudulent" or "corrupt" I'd have to wonder why Trump and his justice department isn't hauling people to court/before Congress.
If "everything" is fraud..then nothing is fraud.

Ok Forrest. You just created a new T-shirt, for those that can't understand the responsibility of being an adult.

I will always vote for smile.
giphy.gif
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,707
Reaction score
6,014
Yeah 2 billion rerouted to Stacy Abrams ngo for refrigerators isn’t covered in fraud as well as millions to media companies for $10,000 subscriptions. That’s just a couple of many examples. Your side is corrupt as can be between lawfare and money laundering. At some point you need to own reality. You guys are a lost cause.
The subscription to a media group doesn't strike be as terribly bad. We don't have a government media apparatus.

To demonstrate, Reuters runs the best legal search engine in the country. They get a ton of money from both public and private entities. Why? They do a very good job. It's my engine of choice, but it is quite expensive.

Stacy Abrams getting paid is indeed waste/abuse.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
Stacy Abrams getting paid is indeed waste/abuse.
 

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
Just complete horseshit that can be dispelled with 5 minutes of googling. It's incredible the way your brain works.

Yeah. How was it dispelled on the msm? Stacy went on tv and tried to explain it. How was the 10k subscriptions explained by msm? You geniuses ever wonder why the richest counties in America are in DC/Northern Virginia area? Politicians becoming millionaires and billionaires on their salary? Keep putting the blinders on boys. I’m not deluded enough to not know establish Repubs and all Democrats are screwing us by giving ludicrous money to ngo’s and half the time getting it filtered it back to them, not even counting the war money laundering.

Liberals believe a man with a dick can be a woman so I know my crowd not expecting anything else but lame excuses. They’ve widdled the Dem party down to straight sheep.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Yeah. How was it dispelled on the msm? Stacy went on tv and tried to explain it. How was the 10k subscriptions explained by msm? You geniuses ever wonder why the richest counties in America are in DC/Northern Virginia area? Politicians becoming millionaires and billionaires on their salary? Keep putting the blinders on boys. I’m not deluded enough to not know establish Repubs and all Democrats are screwing us by giving ludicrous money to ngo’s and half the time getting it filtered it back to them, not even counting the war money laundering.

Liberals believe a man with a dick can be a woman so I know my crowd not expecting anything else but lame excuses. They’ve widdled the Dem party down to straight sheep.
No one tell him that Caitlyn Jenner a transgender women isn't a liberal and is an ardent Republican/Trump supporter
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
5,177
Did you even read your own "fact checks"? Nobody here is claiming she bought votes, we are claiming that we spent $2BN to Abrams' NGO (which almost certainly money goes to Abrams for her to "run") to buy people refrigerators. That is absolute fact
 

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
2billion in fridges? The whole southeast US should have a new fridge but we all know it was a huge money laundering scheme like so much that is now being exposed. So much damn corruption we the people finally get to see and Dems are mad.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
5,177
Yes.



Prove that. Go for it.
I get that syntax is hard for you.

That Abrams' NGO got nearly $2 Billion to buy people appliances in their homes: Fact

That Abrams' was paid by this NGO to do the work: Almost certainly fact. Rewiring America doesn't have publicly available tax information for the time that Abrams has been there. But she's raked in about half a million dollars in the past decade doing her work for other NGOs, so it is almost certain that she didn't take that job just out of the kindness of her heart lmao
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
5,177

1742006953132-png.3058471

1742006970999-png.3058472




Prove it.
Yeah buddy let me go hack into Abrams' checking account to prove a claim that I already stated I can't prove. What a joke lmfao. Yeah I'm sure she wasn't the one calling the shots, because she's not an expert in fucking appliances. She was put on the board as a senior advisor because she has friends in DC and it was a way for her to get IRA funds directed to the NGO in exchange for payment. PROBABLY
 

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
Objection your honor: no exhibits were entered into the record
 
Top