Okay, so you're playing semantics. That's an internet classic. So is your gripe actually with the NBC announcers who talk about grades during games? Or is it with the Admin who put a high value on grades and rightfully are proud of them? Also, you deserve a winning team for putting time and money into cheering? Are you serious? What is your investment? Some Saturday time on the couch? Some time on this board? A few bucks for a hat? Those players put a lot more "investment" into the program. More than you will ever dream of putting in, even if you throw in some extra bones for that ND desk lamp. Nobody deserves a winning team just for being a fan and buying some gear. These kids put in a ton of time working hard on the field and off the field. That includes high school.
Let me tell you about another "internet classic": Somebody posts lucid thoughts. Another poster reads those thoughts and makes the decision to tell the original poster what their own words meant. The original poster restates their thoughts in an even more succinct manner--for the benefit of those beneath the level of events. Finally, the person trying to put words in somebody else's mouth resorts to referring to somebody clarifying their own thoughts as "arguing semantics".
That's rich. Thanks for the laugh.
I don't understand how I can be more direct than saying that I'm sick of other posters falling back on the grades or admissions excuse. Or wait, did I say that? Hmm....I think it was in the post. You're a selective reader.
As far as deserving.....well, yeah we do deserve it. We watch NBC, we buy the gear and those sources of revenue fund the football program and provides those students with scholarships. I'm sure I don't need to tell you that private institutions don't receive subsidies and therefore count on fund raising and the generosity of fans and donors for everything. While it's true that state institutions fund raise and enjoy the benefits of donations, they also have the luxury of being subsidized by the government.
No, I am fine rooting for ND and knowing that grades are important and that winning football games is great too. But I don't expect anything or think I deserve it at the expense of a kid's grades. Also, you're right, this is an ND football board. But ND is a school. Grades kind of come with that situation. Root for a pro team if that annoys you. Not to mention that my post was a response to your post... about grades.
Well here's where you and I differ. I don't find solace in the players' academic achievements while I'm watching Notre Dame suffer a loss to Syracuse or being embarrased by USC. I guess I'm missing the part where I should applaud mediocrity on the football field. Sounds like Harvard or Yale logic to me.
Yeah, an analogy allows a comparison. Check that dictionary link. No you didn't say school shouldn't be their first priority, but you seem to think it shouldn't be a priority over football. Nobody is saying that good grades excuse bad performances on the field. What people are saying is that grades are important because they are students. And it's not right to ask kids to sacrifice grades to put a winning product on the field. And hooray for the single mother. That's called real life where they need to make money to pay bills while taking care of kids. We're talking about football. If ND doesn't win it means we're mad, but the consequences are really not as dire as a single mother not making the rent.
Let me restate this again--as clearly as possible for you--I DON'T THINK PLAYING LOUSY, UNINSPIRED FOOTBALL SHOULD BE EXCUSED AWAY BECAUSE OF SCHOOL. Get that? You even stated that in the second sentence. Who asked the kids to sacrifice their grades? I said I would prefer not to here fans or coaches continue to fall back on that as an excuse. I said I don't care what their grades are....do you? Football is reality for a lot of the players who wouldn't be able to afford Notre Dame without their scholarships. That's pretty real to me.
I don't think you can take it. That's why you complain about me "lecturing" you and "not knowing what you're about." Give me a break, it's a criticism of a post, not a criticism of your life.
I can take it. Am I not here, responding? Also, note how I said my responses to
unintelligent posts are met with a more acerbic tone on my part.