‘21 VA WR Malachi Fields (Virginia Transfer - Notre Dame Verbal)

SDIrishFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,754
Reaction score
2,570
I'm starting to feel like, ND doesn't always do a good job of maximizing the talent they have...
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,099
Reaction score
27,363
I'm starting to feel like, ND doesn't always do a good job of maximizing the talent they have...

60 targets on a team with NFL Draft RB1, RB2, TE4 and whatever comes of Faison ain’t bad. Especially when you consider how much garbage time existed. For example he basically didn’t play against Syracuse. Purdue, Navy, Stanford were also basically 3Q snap counts. That’s almost closer to 10 games played on a run heavy offense.
 
Last edited:

Rocketman84

Well-known member
Messages
2,423
Reaction score
1,203
60 targets on a team with NFL Draft RB1, RB2, TE4 and whatever comes of Faison ain’t bad. Especially when you consider how much garbage time existed. For example he basically didn’t play against Syracuse. Purdue, Navy, Stanford were also basically 3Q snap counts. That’s almost closer to 10 games played on a run heavy offense.
Exactly and honestly how often have WRs put up big numbers here? The last one was probably Claypool 7 years ago.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,099
Reaction score
27,363
Exactly and honestly how often have WRs put up big numbers here? The last one was probably Claypool 7 years ago.

I don’t really care to rehash years ago under a different HC, different OC, different QB and a different era of football. Fields had a solid year and accomplished what was asked of him. I expect other WRs to do the same this year.
 

irishandy

Well-known member
Messages
4,340
Reaction score
1,959
My only complaint is that Notre Dame used Fields as a deep threat WR, but I agree with Dale he had a solid year and if he gets drafted by a team with a passing QB that will be one happy team.
 

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,163
Reaction score
6,450
We didn't and don't utilize the back shoulder fade to the boundary enough in the passing game IMO. Ian Book had a great run throwing it to Boykin and Claypool. CJ without a doubt has the arm talent to do it and Fields would've been outstanding at it. Would like to see that develop into a bigger part of the offense
 

SDIrishFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,754
Reaction score
2,570
60 targets on a team with NFL Draft RB1, RB2, TE4 and whatever comes of Faison ain’t bad. Especially when you consider how much garbage time existed. For example he basically didn’t play against Syracuse. Purdue, Navy, Stanford were also basically 3Q snap counts. That’s almost closer to 10 games played on a run heavy offense.
Right, I wasn’t necessary saying it about Fields specifically. More, we had a huge culmination of talent last year and we didn’t make the playoff. It’s disappointing whether we got robbed or not.

Probably the best ND team, especially at the end of the year, since the early 90s.
 

IAIrish

The Dude Abides
Messages
1,661
Reaction score
2,052
60 targets on a team with NFL Draft RB1, RB2, TE4 and whatever comes of Faison ain’t bad. Especially when you consider how much garbage time existed. For example he basically didn’t play against Syracuse. Purdue, Navy, Stanford were also basically 3Q snap counts. That’s almost closer to 10 games played on a run heavy offense.
We didn't and don't utilize the back shoulder fade to the boundary enough in the passing game IMO. Ian Book had a great run throwing it to Boykin and Claypool. CJ without a doubt has the arm talent to do it and Fields would've been outstanding at it. Would like to see that develop into a bigger part of the offense
60 targets equates to 5 targets/ game in the regular season. I'd imagine that would've ticked up in the playoffs.

I thought there was more meat on that bone, but think we'd all agree we'd rather see Carr/Fields connect on more 3 step fades rather than those bubble screens into heavy traffic that were cringe vs. Miami.
 
Top