Search results

And 2026 will stop all of this handwringing. Outside of JJ Finch getting screwed out of a 4* rating, I can't see anyone ND's Top 10 Most Likely DL's that won't be 4*-5*. One or two will commit a month from today.

Like Cross and Mills?

For me to waste resources on a HS punter or kicker, he'd have to be a Harrison Mevis who would come to ND no questions asked and compete until he won the job (can't believe Polian didn't take the kid). Besides that, it's too easy to open up NCAA.com, make a wish list and start intelligently...

Cross and Mills weren't elite, can you win a title with them if everything else is clicking?

I'd like to see 6 years of eligibility as long as you are on pace to get a bachelors in 4 and a masters in 6. You then have a choice of trying to be a Bama/UGa/OSU 5* hunter who leave in 3 or a Harbaugh@Stanford model where you rely on 5th & 6th year college studs who are making as much/more...

The Godfather sticking his neck on the line. I like it.

Wait, are you retiring or getting divorced.? That 100% sounds like my divorce.

Not players we like

Pam

Apparently took Gino 4 minutes to WTF him.

Why are the first 3 subject to a pecking order? Hall being alone in forth IS the pecking order, not SHOULD BE.

Pookie comin for yall.

Weird reporting on Hall. He knows he doesn't have a seat right now. The staff told him that and he was forced to place a priority on Purdue, Stanford, etc. The question the sites should be asking is... IF ND doesn't land one of the Top 3 WR's, will Hall jump at a then committable offer...

Or maybe Meadows is peak ESB? And that wouldn't be a bad thing.

I was thinking about this today and here's my take. Hines is a poor man's Fuller. Robinson is a poor man's Floyd. Meadows is a rich man's Robinson... Corey.

Never, ever use the M word when describing a WR prospect.

You'll get a game in Columbus every other year and like it.

Any chance 247 would hire Ryan Roberts?

How's The Slippery Coyote sound?

Another step towards yearly games vs MI, MSU, Purdue... It's the haves vs the have nots.