IrishinSyria
In truth lies victory
- Messages
- 6,042
- Reaction score
- 1,920
I would put this in one of the panic threads, but it relates to the entire season so I decided I'd make a new one.
Basically, my concern is that our coaching staff has frequently failed to take advantage of other teams' weaknesses.
Today provides me with good examples of this point on both offense and defense. On offense, it seems like a power running game in general, and Robert Hughes in particular, would have been a nightmare for Navy to defend against. They are a quick team, but seriously undersized. A few of their linebackers weighed in under 210. Instead, when we did run it we had Cierre Wood trying to stretch the d. This basically neutralized our tremendous advantage in size on the offensive line and allowed their LBs to make plays with their speed as opposed to their power. The same criticism could be applied to the Western Michigan game: they had a 205 pound defensive end and instead of running straight at him we allowed him to be productive on the pass rush all game long.
On the defensive side of the ball, today we lined up exactly the same way we line up for every game. We kept our safeties way back, our OLBs pinned to the line of scrimmage, and tried to make our defense as predictable as possible. Navy threw the ball three times all game, yet we refused to put 8 or 9 in the box. Do we have that little faith in our corners? I know Gray got burned today (did it look like he quit on that play to anybody else) but still...they should be good enough to trust with man coverage vs Navy.
There have been other games where we chose to have LBs covering WRs instead of going to a nickel or a dime package. I appreciate it that the coaches have a plan for this team and don't want to deviate from that plan, but at some point a team has to be flexible. Today was not the first time we played to another team's strengths.
So, the question is: are the coaches right in sticking to their guns? Or do we need to start making bigger adjustments? Kelly might need a few years before he has an ideal toolset, but he's got plenty of excellent weapons to use in the meantime. Does anybody else think his vision is preventing him from making the most of what he has?
Basically, my concern is that our coaching staff has frequently failed to take advantage of other teams' weaknesses.
Today provides me with good examples of this point on both offense and defense. On offense, it seems like a power running game in general, and Robert Hughes in particular, would have been a nightmare for Navy to defend against. They are a quick team, but seriously undersized. A few of their linebackers weighed in under 210. Instead, when we did run it we had Cierre Wood trying to stretch the d. This basically neutralized our tremendous advantage in size on the offensive line and allowed their LBs to make plays with their speed as opposed to their power. The same criticism could be applied to the Western Michigan game: they had a 205 pound defensive end and instead of running straight at him we allowed him to be productive on the pass rush all game long.
On the defensive side of the ball, today we lined up exactly the same way we line up for every game. We kept our safeties way back, our OLBs pinned to the line of scrimmage, and tried to make our defense as predictable as possible. Navy threw the ball three times all game, yet we refused to put 8 or 9 in the box. Do we have that little faith in our corners? I know Gray got burned today (did it look like he quit on that play to anybody else) but still...they should be good enough to trust with man coverage vs Navy.
There have been other games where we chose to have LBs covering WRs instead of going to a nickel or a dime package. I appreciate it that the coaches have a plan for this team and don't want to deviate from that plan, but at some point a team has to be flexible. Today was not the first time we played to another team's strengths.
So, the question is: are the coaches right in sticking to their guns? Or do we need to start making bigger adjustments? Kelly might need a few years before he has an ideal toolset, but he's got plenty of excellent weapons to use in the meantime. Does anybody else think his vision is preventing him from making the most of what he has?